Search

Objectives: White spot lesions are one of the most common side effects of orthodontic therapy with a multibracket appliance and may indicate a preliminary stage of caries, also known as initial caries. Several approaches may be utilized to prevent these lesions, such as reducing bacterial adhesion in the area surrounding the bracket. This bacterial colonization can be adversely affected by a number of local characteristics. In this context, the effects of excess dental adhesive in the bracket periphery were investigated by comparing a conventional bracket system with the APC flash-free bracket system., Materials and Methods: Both bracket systems were applied to 24 extracted human premolars, and bacterial adhesion with Streptoccocus sobrinus (S. sobrinus) was performed for 24 h, 48 h, 7 d, and 14 d. After incubation, bacterial colonization was examined in specific areas by electron microscopy., Results: Overall, significantly fewer bacterial colonies were found in the adhesive area around the APC flash-free brackets (n = 507 ± 13 bacteria) than the conventionally bonded bracket systems (n = 850 ± 56 bacteria). This is a significant difference (**p = 0.004). However, APC flash-free brackets tend to create marginal gaps with more bacterial adhesion in this area than conventional bracket systems (n = 265 ± 31 bacteria). This bacterial accumulation in the marginal-gap area is also significant (*p = 0.029)., Conclusion: A smooth adhesive surface with minimal adhesive excess is beneficial for reducing bacterial adhesion but also poses a risk of marginal gap formation with subsequent bacterial colonization, which can potentially trigger carious lesions., Clinical Relevance: To reduce bacterial adhesion, the APC flash-free bracket adhesive system with low adhesive excess might be beneficial. APC flash-free brackets reduce the bacterial colonization in the bracket environment. A lower number of bacteria can minimize white spot lesions in the bracket environment. APC flash-free brackets tend to form marginal gaps between the bracket adhesive and the tooth., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objectives: Decalcification during orthodontic treatment is significantly increased. To prevent this negative impact, new treatments with sealants before bonding brackets are commonly been used. This systematic review discusses current knowledge on shear bond strength when using sealant before bonding., Materials and Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to identify studies that address shear bond strength after using a sealant before bonding brackets. The search was carried out using common electronic databases in addition to individual searches. Both screening and study eligibility analysis were performed according to PRISMA and Cochrane Guidelines for systematic reviews. Several terms describing shear bond strength after using a sealant before bonding brackets were searched. Particular attention was paid to bond failure and bracket loss. For the statistical outcome, all results were shown in a forest plot based on standardized mean differences (SMD) with a random-effects model to respect heterogeneity of these studies. To assess the heterogeneity of the different trials, I 2 -value and the Q-Test were performed., Results: The initial search identified 416 studies. After a thorough selection process, a total of 15 articles met the inclusion criteria. All 15 articles reported results of in vitro studies. Papers were divided into four subgroups according to their used product: ProSeal, Transbond bonding, the combination of Transbond bonding and ProSeal and Clearfil Protect Bond. The results of this review demonstrate a high heterogeneity of the studies. The SMD of the examined 15 articles show nearly no difference between the control and the intervention groups in shear bond strength (p < 0.0001; OR - 0.12; Cl - 0.47-0.23). Forest plots for comparison of the subgroups depict no difference in shear bond strength as well., Conclusions: This meta-analysis concludes that there is no additive benefit for shear bond strength when using sealant before bonding. However, additional randomized controlled studies should be performed to analyze impact of sealants on bonding strength and bracket loss in more detail., Clinical Relevance: Using sealants before orthodontic bonding does not reduce shear bond strength., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Objectives: The number of patients in dentistry taking bisphosphonates (BP) increases every year. There are only little data about the influence of biomechanical stress due to orthodontic treatment and periodontal inflammation in BP patients. This study focused on the effects of the induced inflammation by IL-1ß in compressed human periodontal ligament fibroblasts (HPdLF) exposed to the nitrogen-containing BP zoledronate in vitro., Materials and Methods: HPdLF were incubated with 5 μmol/l zoledronate and 10 ng/ml IL-1ß for 48 h. In the last 3 h, cells were exposed to a compressive, centrifugal force of 34.9 g/cm 2 . Cell viability was analyzed directly after the compressive force by MTT assay. Gene expression of COX-2 and IL-6 was investigated using quantitative qRT-PCR. PGE-2 and IL-6 protein secretion were measured via ELISA., Results: The cell viability of HPdLF was not affected. Without inflammatory pre-stimulation, COX-2 expression was increased by compression and zoledronate. IL-6 expression was increased under compression. On secretion level, the combination of compression and zoledronate induced a slightly increase of IL-6 secretion. In contrast, inflammatory pre-stimulation strengthened the compressive upregulation of COX-2, as well as induced a higher PGE-2 secretion. Further addition of zoledronate to pre-stimulated cells additionally strengthened the compression-induced upregulation of COX-2 and IL-6 expression as well as protein secretion compared to all other groups., Conclusions: Biomechanical stress might trigger a pro-inflammatory potential of BP further enhanced in the presence of an inflammatory pre-stimulation., Clinical Relevance: To prevent excessive host inflammatory responses, occlusal overloading and mechanical stress due to orthodontic treatment should be avoided in BP patients with untreated periodontitis.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro the effect of clodronate on interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß)-stimulated human periodontal ligament fibroblasts (HPdLFs) with the focus on inflammatory factors of orthodontic tooth movement with and without compressive force., Materials and Methods: HPdLFs were incubated with 5 μM clodronate and 10 ng/mL IL-1ß. After 48 h, cells were exposed to 3 h of compressive force using a centrifuge. The gene expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), interleukin-6 (IL-6), matrix metalloproteinase 8 (MMP-8), and the tissue inhibitor of MMP (TIMP-1) was analyzed using RT-PCR. Prostaglandin E2 (PGE-2), IL-6, and TIMP-1 protein syntheses were quantified via ELISA., Results: Compressive force and IL-1ß induced an overexpression of COX-2 gene expression (61.8-fold; p < 0.05 compared with control), diminished by clodronate (41.1-fold; p < 0.05 compared with control). Clodronate slowed down the compression and IL-1ß induced IL-6 gene expression (161-fold vs. 85.6-fold; p < 0.05 compared with control). TNF-α was only slightly affected without statistical significance. Clodronate reduced IL-1ß-stimulated MMP-8 expression with and without compressive force. TIMP-1 on gene and protein level was downregulated in all groups. Analyzing the MMP-8/TIMP-1 ratio, the highest ratio was detected in IL-1ß-stimulated HPdLFs with compressive force (21.2-fold; p < 0.05 compared with control). Clodronate diminished IL-1ß-induced upregulation of MMP-8/TIMP-1 ratio with (11.5-fold; p < 0.05 compared with control) and without (12.5-fold; p < 0.05 compared with control) compressive force., Conclusion: Our study demonstrates a slightly anti-inflammatory effect by clodronate under compressive force in vitro. Additionally, the periodontal remodeling presented by the MMP-8/TIMP-1 ratio seems to be diminished by clodronate., Clinical Relevance: Reduction of pro-inflammatory factors and reduction of periodontal remodeling might explain reduced orthodontic tooth movement under clodronate intake.

Objectives: There is increasing evidence that inflammation and biomechanical loading can influence the effects of bisphosphonates (BP). The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of tensile strain application combined with IL-1ß and clodronate or zoledronate on human periodontal ligament fibroblasts (HPdLF) in vitro., Materials and Methods: HPdLF were cultured with 10 nM IL-1ß and 5 μM clodronate or zoledronate for 48 h. Cells were applied to cyclic tensile strain (CTS; 3% elongation) for 12 h in vitro. Cell number was analyzed directly after CTS by MTT assay. Gene expression of receptor activator of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) was investigated using real-time PCR. MMP-8, TIMP-1, and PGE2 were measured by ELISA. Statistics were performed with SPSS (ANOVA, p < 0.05)., Results: Zoledronate reduced the cell number of HPdLF (60.3 vs. 100%), which was significant when combined with IL-1ß. Combined with 3% CTS, this effect was voided and cell number increased over the level of the control cells. IL-1ß led to a 10-fold increase of COX-2 gene expression. Combined with CTS and zoledronate, this increase was enhanced to a gene expression 70-fold that of control cells with related PGE2 synthesis. Clodronate neither reduce the cell number nor enhanced the COX-2 gene expression. CTS increased MMP-8 protein synthesis. Combined with BP, this increase was voided. TIMP-1 protein synthesis was increased at all conditions under CTS., Conclusions: Mechanical loading might activate cell metabolism and abolish BP- and inflammation-induced reduction of viability. Combination of mechanical loading, inflammation, and nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates can cause pro-inflammatory effects., Clinical Relevance: Periodontal inflammation should be treated initially before BP intake to prevent decreased cell viability of the periodontium and increased inflammation, which might be enhanced by the addition of mastication forces.

Objectives: Class III therapy using a face mask is a common approach for treatment of a deficient maxilla and reverse overbite. Usually, maxillary protraction is combined with transverse palatal expansion using intraoral appliances. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the effectiveness of face mask therapy in combination with concepts of palatal expansion and compression., Material and Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to identify studies that address class III treatment using a face mask. The search was carried out using common electronic databases as well as hand search. Both screening and study eligibility analysis were performed with consideration of PRISMA and Cochrane Guidelines for systematic reviews. Several terms describing class III face mask treatment were searched. Particular attention was paid to new strategies of enhancing maxillary protraction., Results: The initial search identified 2048 studies. After a thorough selection process, a total of 22 articles met the inclusion criteria. After assessment of the individual quality scoring of each article, eight studies were provided for meta-analysis of the cephalometric parameters. The statistical analysis of treatment changes advocates a positive influence on sagittal maxillary development, which is not primarily influenced by transverse expansion. Dental side effects are more distinct when no expansion was carried out. For the concept of alternating activation/deactivation of the expansion appliance (alt-RAMEC), two articles of high methodological scoring were identified. They indicate an enhancement of face mask treatment., Conclusions: The findings are consistent with results of previous literature studies regarding the efficiency of class III face mask treatment. A further need for more randomized controlled studies was identified especially with regard to the new concept of alternating maxillary expansion and compression, which showed a positive influence on the maxillary protraction based on two studies., Clinical Relevance: Class III therapy using extraoral face mask anchorage is effective for maxillary protraction. The recently discussed new protocols potentially improve this treatment.

Objectives: There is increasing evidence that bisphosphonates affect orthodontic tooth movement. The object of the study was to investigate the changes produced by tensile strain on human periodontal ligament fibroblasts (HPdLFs) treated with clodronate or zoledronate., Materials and Methods: HPdLF were cultured with 5 and 50 μM clodronate or zoledronate for 48 h and applied to tensile strain (TS) (5 and 10 %) for 12 h in vitro. Viability was verified by MTT assay and apoptosis rate via caspase 3/7 assay. Gene expression of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) was investigated using real-time PCR. OPG was also analyzed by ELISA and RANKL by immunocytochemical staining., Results: Zoledronate (50 μM) reduced the viability of HPdLF (76 vs 100 %) and combined with 5 % TS to 53 %. TS of 10 % and clodronate reduced viability to 79 % with increased caspase 3/7 activity. Clodronate (5 μM) led to a slight increase of OPG gene expression, zoledronate (5 μM) to a slight decrease. Combined with 5 % TS, both increased OPG gene expression (2-3-fold) and OPG synthesis. Zoledronate increased gene expression of RANKL (4-fold). Combined with 5 % of TS, this increase was abolished. TS of 10 % in combination amplified increase of RANKL ending up with a 9-fold gene expression by clodronate and high RANKL protein synthesis., Conclusions: This study shows for the first time that mechanical loading alters the effects of bisphosphonates on viability, apoptosis rate, and OPG/RANKL system of HPdLF dependent on the applied strength. Low forces and bisphosphonates increase factors for bone apposition, whereas high forces combined with bisphosphonates stimulate osteoclastogenesis., Clinical Relevance: Mechanical loading of periodontal ligament with high strengths should be avoided during bisphosphonate therapy.

Objectives: Mechanical loading is a potential activator of inflammation and able to stimulate factors for periodontal and alveolar bone destruction. Aim of this study was to investigate the inflammatory response and synthesis of proteinases by human periodontal ligament fibroblast (HPdLF) dependent on different strengths of static tensile strain (STS)., Materials and Methods: HPdLFs were loaded with different STS strengths (1, 5, and 10 %) in vitro. Gene expressions of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 and interleukin (IL)-6 were analyzed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Production of IL-6, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-8, and tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1 were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa ligand (RANKL) synthesis was detected by immunocytochemical staining., Results: Ten percent STS led to an increased gene expression of IL-6 and COX-2 (34.4-fold) in HPdLF, and 1 and 5 % STS slightly reduced the gene expression of IL-6. Synthesis of IL-6 was significantly reduced by 1 % STS and stimulated by 10 % STS. Ten percent STS significantly induced PGE2 production. RANKL was not detectable at any strength of STS. MMP-8 synthesis showed significantly higher values only at 10 % STS, but TIMP-1 was stimulated by 5 and 10 % STS, resulting into highest TIMP-1/MMP-8 ratio at 5 % STS., Conclusions: High-strength STS is a potent inducer of periodontal inflammation and MMP-8, whereas low-strength STS shows an anti-inflammatory effect. Moderate-strength STS causes the highest TIMP-1/MMP-8 ratio, leading to appropriate conditions for reformation of the extracellular matrix., Clinical Relevance: Furthermore, this study points out that the strength of force plays a pivotal role to achieve orthodontic tooth movement without inducing periodontal inflammation and to activate extracellular matrix regeneration.