Search

Competing Interests: Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Background: To decrease the recurrence rate after intralesional curettage for aneurysmal bone cysts, different adjuvant treatments have been recommended. Liquid nitrogen spray and argon beam coagulation have provided the lowest recurrence rates, but unlike the high-speed burr, these adjuvants are not always available in operating rooms., Questions/purposes: We asked: (1) Is high-speed burring alone sufficient as an adjuvant to curettage with respect to recurrence rates? (2) What is the complication rate from this technique? (3) What are the risk factors for local recurrence?, Methods: A retrospective review of the database of the University Musculoskeletal Tumor Unit and the private files of the senior author (EHW) for a period of 19 years (1993-2011) was performed to identify all patients histologically diagnosed with primary aneurysmal bone cyst. During that period, patients with aneurysmal bone cysts were treated with intralesional curettage, burring, and bone grafting if the lesions showed an adequate cortical wall or a wall with thinned out portions which could be reconstructed with bone grafting. Based on those indications, we treated 54 patients for this condition. Of those, 18 were treated using approaches other than burring because they did not meet the defined indications, and an additional five patients were lost to followup before 2 years, leaving 31 patients for analysis, all of whom were followed up for at least 2 years (mean, 7 years; range, 2-18 years)., Results: Of these 31 patients, one had a recurrence (3.2%). Complications using this approach occurred in three patients (9.7%), and included growth plate deformity (1) and genu varus (2) secondary to collapse of the reconstructed condyle. With only one recurrence, we cannot answer what the risk factors might be for recurrence; however, the one patient with recurrence presented with a large lesion and a pathologic fracture., Conclusions: Curettage, burring, and bone grafting compare favorably in the literature with other approaches for aneurysmal bone cysts, such as cryotherapy and argon-beam coagulation. We conclude that high-speed burring alone as an adjuvant to intralesional curettage is a reasonable approach to achieving a low recurrence rate for aneurysmal bone cysts., Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Primary aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) are benign, expansile bone lesions commonly treated with aggressive curettage with or without adjuvants such as cryotherapy, methacrylate cement, or phenol. It has been reported that occasionally these lesions heal spontaneously or after a pathologic fracture, and we observed that some ABCs treated at our center healed after biopsy alone. Because of this, we introduced a novel biopsy technique we call "curopsy," which is a percutaneous limited curettage at the time of biopsy, obtaining the lining membrane from various quadrants of the cyst leading to consolidation (curopsy = biopsy with intention to cure)., Questions/purposes: We asked whether (1) a curopsy results in comparable likelihood of healing of the ABC compared with more aggressive approaches involving curettage, (2) the two approaches differ in terms of the likelihood of recurrence after treatment, and (3) the two approaches differ in terms of complications after surgery., Methods: Between January 1, 1999 and June 30, 2012, 221 patients with a diagnosis of primary ABC were registered in our oncology database. Patients presenting with a pathologic fracture and those seeking a second opinion were excluded. One hundred ninety patients were included in the study. One hundred two (54%) were treated with curopsy and 88 (46%) were treated with curettage after a core needle biopsy. Complete followups were available for 88% (90 of 102) and 93% (80 of 88) of patients in those groups, respectively. During that period, a curopsy was performed for all patients with benign bone lesions with imaging suggestive of classic primary ABCs and for whom the core needle biopsy simply showed blood with no solid component. Curettage after a core needle biopsy was reserved for histologically confirmed primary ABCs, lesions with impending fractures, large lesions, if the ABC was thought to be a secondary disorder, and patients for whom the curopsy failed. All patients were followed up until consolidation of the lesion (mean, 9.6 weeks, range, 3-25 weeks, 95% CI, 8.32-10.9 for curopsy; mean, 11.4 weeks, range, 8-32 weeks, 95% CI, 10.6-12.3 for curettage). The median followup for all patients was 14 months (range, 6-36 months)., Results: Of the 102 patients who had curopsy and observation, 83 (81%) required no additional treatment and the lesion resolved. Of the 88 patients who underwent curettage (with or without adjuvant therapy) after core needle biopsy, the success rate was 90% (79 of 88). Local recurrences in both groups (curopsy or curettage) were treated successfully with additional curettage in all but one case. Curopsy in comparison to curettage provided a mean shorter healing time (9.6 versus 11.4, p = 0.01) but there was a higher local recurrence and need for additional intervention rate (18.6% versus 10.2%, p = 0.04). There were no differences in the complications between the treatment groups., Conclusions: A curopsy is a novel biopsy technique that was successful in resolving ABCs in 81% of the patients in our study. Curopsy, as a biopsy technique, for ABCs needs consideration as it potentially minimizes the number of patients needing a second procedure (a core needle biopsy being the first) as is the current practice. Furthermore, it does not disadvantage the patient or surgeon should additional intervention be needed in the form of curettage with or without adjuvants., Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) has a recurrence rate of between 12% and 71% without en bloc resection or amputation. There is no percutaneous ABC treatment drug regimen demonstrating consistent evidence of bone healing with recurrence of < 12%. Doxycycline has properties that may make it appropriate for percutaneous treatment., Questions/purposes: We therefore asked: (1) Is there reduction in ABC lytic cyst volume with injectable doxycycline? (2) Is it associated with thickening of involved bony cortex? (3) Is the recurrence rate after percutaneous treatment < 12%?, Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 20 patients who underwent percutaneous treatment of ABCs with doxycycline from 2006 to 2010. The mean age was 10 years (range, 3-18 years). There were 21 treatment locations: humerus (six), spine (five), clavicle (two), fibula (one), femur (two), ulna (two), tibia (two), and scapula (one). Twenty patients completed treatment involving 118 treatment sessions (two to 14 sessions per patient). Treatment response was evaluated radiographically by measuring the lytic component and thickness of involved cortex. Recurrence was indicated by new areas of lytic destruction after completion of treatment. The minimum followup was 24 months (mean, 38 months)., Results: Twenty of 20 patients demonstrated reduction in lytic destruction and bony healing. All patients demonstrated cortical thickening. One patient demonstrated recurrent minimal lytic destruction after 20 months of observation., Conclusions: In this series, patients undergoing percutaneous doxycycline treatment of ABCs demonstrated a healing response and a recurrence rate of 5% at more than 24 months.

Aneurysmal bone cysts are benign active or aggressive bone tumors that commonly arise in the long bones, especially the femur, tibia, and humerus and the posterior elements of the spine. Aneurysmal bone cysts affect all age groups but are more common before skeletal maturity (first two decades of life). They usually involve the metaphysis or metadiaphyseal region of long bones. Although juxtaphyseal lesions abutting the growth plate and extending into the epiphysis have been described, there is no report of an aneurysmal bone cyst entirely and primarily located in the epiphysis. We report on a 3-year-old boy who presented with an entirely contained aneurysmal bone cyst to the proximal tibial epiphysis. We discuss the clinical presentation, diagnosis, including imaging and pathology, and treatment. A review of the pertinent literature also is presented.

High recurrence rates have been reported after surgical treatment of aneurysmal bone cysts, ranging from 10-59%, and greater (five of seven) in children younger than 10 years. No previous study has focused specifically on recurrence as a function of age in a large pediatric study. The purpose of the current study was to review the outcome of current surgical techniques in the treatment of primary aneurysmal bone cysts in children and to determine if recurrence rates were higher in younger children, as proposed by some authors. This study included 45 children with primary aneurysmal bone cysts with more than 2 years followup after their first treatment using our current four-step surgical technique. The subjects were studied and classified on the basis of their age group (< or = 10 years of age or >10 years of age). The recurrence rate, and other parameters were determined after surgical treatment. Of the 45 children with primary aneurysmal bone cysts, 13 children were 10 years or younger and 32 were older than 10 years. Persistence or recurrence of the lesion requiring additional surgery occurred in three children in the younger age group and in five children in the older age group. The difference in persistence or recurrence rates based on age was not statistically significant. However, the persistence or recurrence rates are lower than previously reported (82% overall success rate after initial surgery).

This is a case of aneurysmal bone cyst arising from a fibrous metaphyseal defect of the proximal tibia in a toddler. A 32-month-old girl presented with physiologic bowing with a small metaphyseal defect at the medial aspect of the left proximal tibia. A large aneurysmal bone cyst, occupying almost the entire metaphysis of the proximal tibia, evolved from this lesion during the following 1 year 3 months. The lesion healed uneventfully after curettage and bone grafting. This case emphasizes the importance of regular followups to observe the clinical course of a fibrous metaphyseal defect during childhood.

The differential between aneurysmal bone cysts and unicameral bone cysts usually is clear clinically and radiographically. Occasionally there are cases in which the diagnosis is not clear. Because natural history and treatment are different, the ability to distinguish between these two entities before surgery is important. The authors reviewed, in a blinded fashion, the preoperative magnetic resonance images to investigate criteria that could be used to differentiate between the two lesions. All patients had operative or pathologic confirmation of an aneurysmal bone cyst or unicameral bone cyst. The authors analyzed the preoperative magnetic resonance images of 14 patients with diagnostically difficult bone cysts (eight children with unicameral bone cysts and six children with aneurysmal bone cysts) and correlated these findings with diagnosis after biopsy or cyst aspiration and contrast injection. The presence of a double density fluid level within the lesion strongly indicated that the lesion was an aneurysmal bone cyst, rather than a unicameral bone cyst. Other criteria that suggested the lesion was an aneurysmal bone cyst were the presence of septations within the lesion and signal characteristics of low intensity on T1 images and high intensity on T2 images. The authors identified a way of helping to differentiate between aneurysmal bone cysts and unicameral bone cysts on magnetic resonance images. Double density fluid level, septation, and low signal on T1 images and high signal on T2 images strongly suggest the bone cyst in question is an aneurysmal bone cyst, rather than a unicameral bone cyst. This may be helpful before surgery for the child who has a cystic lesion for which radiographic features do not allow a clear differentiation of unicameral bone cyst from aneurysmal bone cyst.