1. Occipitocervical fusions in children. Retrospective analysis and technical considerations.
- Author
-
Rodgers WB, Coran DL, Emans JB, Hresko MT, and Hall JE
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Age Factors, Bone Transplantation methods, Bone Wires, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Immobilization, Infant, Joint Instability diagnostic imaging, Joint Instability etiology, Male, Radiography, Retrospective Studies, Spinal Fusion adverse effects, Spinal Fusion instrumentation, Treatment Outcome, Cervical Vertebrae surgery, Joint Instability surgery, Occipital Bone surgery, Spinal Fusion methods
- Abstract
This report presents a retrospective analysis of the authors' experience with occipitocervical fusions in children and adolescents during the last 2 decades. A description of an operative technique devised by the senior author (JEH), and a comparison of the results using this and other methods of fusion are given. Twenty-three patients underwent occipitocervical fusion. Fifteen of the patients were operated on using the authors' technique. To achieve stable fixation of the distal cervical vertebra a threaded Kirschner wire was passed transversely through the spinous process; occipital fixation was achieved by the traditional method of wiring corticocancellous bone graft to the skull through burr holes. The occipital wires then were wrapped around the Kirschner wire and the graft was cradled in the resulting nest. Halo immobilization was used in 10 patients for an average of 12.5 weeks (range, 6-24 weeks). Twenty-two patients achieved successful fusion at an average followup of 5.8 years (range, 1-14.33 years). Several complications, including transient quadriplegia in one patient, pseudarthrosis in two (one of which persists), hardware fixation failure in one, unintended distal extension of the fusion, pneumonia, wound infection, halo pin infection, skin breakdown under the halo vest, hydrocephalus, cerebrospinal fluid leak, and traumatic fusion fracture were encountered. Results using the technique described herein are comparable with or better than the results reported in the previous literature, and the results of the patients in this series in whom the technique was not used.
- Published
- 1999