Search

Bone cements loaded with combinations of antibiotics are assumed more effective in preventing infection than bone cements with gentamicin as a single drug. Moreover, loading with an additional antibiotic may increase interconnectivity between antibiotic particles to enhance release. We hypothesize addition of clindamycin to a gentamicin-loaded cement yields higher antibiotic release and causes larger inhibition zones against clinical isolates grown on agar and stronger biofilm inhibition. Antibiotic release after 672 hours from Copal bone cement was more extensive (65% of the clindamycin and 41% of the gentamicin incorporated) than from Palacos R-G (4% of the gentamicin incorporated). The higher antibiotic release from Copal resulted in a stronger and more prolonged inhibition of bacterial growth on agar. Bacterial colony counting and confocal laser scanning microscopy of biofilms grown on the bone cements suggest antibiotic release reduced bacterial viability, most notably close to the cement surface. The gentamicin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus formed gentamicin-resistant small colony variants on Palacos R-G and therefore Copal more effectively decreased biofilm formation than Palacos R-G.

Biomaterial-associated infection of orthopaedic joint replacements is the second most common cause of implant failure. Yet, the microbiologic detection rate of infection is relatively low, probably because routine hospital cultures are made only of swabs or small pieces of excised tissue and not of the surfaces of potentially infected implants. Joint replacements from patients in whom infection was suspected, after clinical, radiologic, and biochemical examinations, were used in this study. The aim of the current study was to compare the detection rate of infection in total joint replacements based on cultures of the excised tissue and scrapings from the biomaterial surface. Joint prostheses were retrieved from 22 patients requiring orthopaedic revision surgery because of suspected infection of their prostheses. Routine hospital culturing of tissue only showed bacterial growth in nine patients (41%). However, after prolonged culturing, bacterial growth was observed in 14 patients (64%), whereas extensive culturing of scrapings from the biomaterial surface indicated bacterial growth in 19 of the 22 patients (86%). In addition, confocal laser scanning microscopy enabled observation of biofilm bacteria on the surfaces of the explanted prostheses. Diagnosis in orthopaedic revision surgery should consider using a microbial or microscopic analysis of the surface of an explanted prosthesis, where the biofilm mode of growth firmly anchors and protects the infecting organisms. Improved detection of infection by analysis of the implant surface is expected to yield ameliorated therapy and a reduced need for revision surgery.