Search

Aim: To assess if a child-assessment checklist covering tasks children are expected to perform during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can determine whether the child requires general anaesthesia (GA) during MRI., Materials and Methods: In this institute review board approved study, children who underwent MRI from September 2016 to June 2017 at KK Women's and Children's Hospital were assessed using a checklist by a research assistant before their examination. During this project, the checklist had no influence on whether the MRI was performed under GA or not. The checklist consisted of five items rated on a binary scale assessing the child's behaviour. Binary logistic regression was performed separately on the overall sample and for a subset of younger children to identify variables associated with the requirement for GA., Results: The mean age of the overall sample (798 children) and the subset of children <8 years (124 children) were 11.7±3.7 and 5.5±1.3 years, respectively. In both groups, children who required GA were significantly younger than those who did not (p<0.001). No gender differences were observed. Children who required GA scored higher on the checklist compared to those who did not in both groups (p<0.001). The diagnostic accuracy of the checklist was found to be good (area under the curve [AUC]=0.97 for both groups), with a suggested cut-off score of 4. Intraclass correlation coefficient of the ratings by two independent individuals was 0.78., Conclusion: The child assessment checklist was useful in identifying GA requirement in children undergoing MRI and can be administered by non-medical staff with good inter-rater reliability., (Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The ability of a child to remain sufficiently immobile for painless imaging depends upon their behaviour and the imaging itself. Anaesthesia allows imaging to be optimised but it is expensive, scarce and inappropriate for many situations. Fortunately, sedation and behavioural techniques are sufficiently successful for the majority of scanning, and success rates are high provided that suitable children are selected. Sedation, however, administered by non-anaesthetists, may have catastrophic complications such as airway obstruction. Current UK recommendations demand that any sedation technique has a 'wide margin of safety', but in addition to this, safety is dependent on trained, skillful and experienced staff. Magnetic resonance imaging frightens many children and special planning is necessary for sedation and anaesthesia. When planning an imaging service for children, all the management techniques should be considered in order to achieve maximum efficiency, quality and safety.

Objectives: To establish the level of patient knowledge of ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); to describe patient information-seeking behaviour before attendance; and to assess patients' understanding of the main aspects of scanning examinations., Design: Survey of people attending for ultrasound, CT and MRI using a questionnaire, including 12 statements on simple aspects of procedures, to be indicated as true or false., Setting: Radiology department of an acute teaching hospital NHS Trust in the north-east of Scotland., Participants: A convenience sample of 500 out-patient, non-emergency first time attenders for ultrasound (300), computed tomography (150), and magnetic resonance imaging (50)., Results: An 82% response rate to the questionnaire was achieved. Less than half the patients (48.9%, 182/372) indicated they knew the type of investigation they had been referred for. When responses were compared with referral letters, 64% (238/372) were incongruent. Few participants hadsought information (32%, 120/372), but of those who had the main source was family and friends (72%, 86/120). Seven participants searched the Internet. Eighty-two percent (308/372) of participants reported having been given an explanation of why an investigation was necessary. The majority of participants (67.8%, 251/372) expected to receive their results within 2 weeks. The mean score on the 12 true/false knowledge statements was 3.8, and 17% (65/372) answered 'Don't know' to all the statements. One person answered all questions correctly., Conclusions: Patients were not well informed regarding these investigations. This has significant implications for information-giving strategies and informed consent., (Copyright 2002 The Royal College of Radiologists.)

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has become an important technique in the evaluation of a wide range of congenital and acquired conditions in children. The ability to image in multiple anatomic planes without the use of ionizing radiation has particular advantages. However scan times can be long, and the narrow bore and noise generated by most units make the procedure very intimidating to the young child. The use of surface coils may exacerbate this, often necessitating recourse to sedation or anaesthesia. We describe a technique involving play therapy which we have found useful in the preparation of young children for MR imaging and which has reduced the number of non-diagnostic scans and the need for sedation or anaesthesia.

Purpose: To determine the difference in anxiety reactions in patients undergoing standard (non-breast) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared to breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRM) and to evaluate the influence of patient information before the breast imaging examination on the rate of premature termination of the procedure., Materials and Methods: Over 2 years, 5837 non-breast and 336 breast magnetic resonance examinations were performed at our institution. One group of breast MRM patients (n = 144) received detailed information and a second group (n = 189) received only routine information before MRI. The rates of premature termination were recorded for all groups., Results: In 0.5% (27/5837) of patients undergoing standard MRI examinations the study had to be stopped prematurely. Of the breast MRM patients, those who had received only routine information had a significantly higher rate of premature termination when compared to the better-informed patients and those undergoing standard MRI (5.5%, 10/189, P= 0.01). A significantly lower rate of premature termination occurred in the better-informed breast group (0%, 0/144)., Conclusion: MRM is associated with an increase in patient anxiety and higher rates of incomplete examination than other MR procedures. We recommend careful patient preparation including detailed verbal information before MRM and support during the procedure to obtain optimal patient compliance.

There are several anxiety-related reactions associated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients who experience such reactions may disrupt the examination or move so much that images are degraded. These experiences may also influence patients' perceptions of the quality of their care. The objective of this study was to further assess the subjective experiences of patients undergoing MRI in an attempt to identify those patients likely to have problems and factors affecting their experiences. Five hundred consecutive patients undergoing MRI were surveyed using questionnaires before and immediately after imaging. Anxiety was measured using the state anxiety component of the state-trait anxiety inventory. All patients exhibited some degree of pre-imaging anxiety. This was particularly associated with a previous 'unpleasant' imaging experience. Patients who experienced problems during MRI had pre-imaging anxiety levels equivalent to patients about to undergo surgery, were more likely to react badly when first seeing the scanner and were more likely to leave the MRI unit with even greater feelings of anxiety than when they arrived. In contrast to previous studies, anxiety was not associated with either the patient's understanding of the procedure or the duration of the examination. Several features have been identified which could improve the patient's experience (e.g. better information sheet). Awareness of MRI-related anxiety should also be considered when assessing the impact of MRI on outcome for the patient.

Clinical experience with the new technology of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has indicated that the procedure may produce anxiety in a number of patients, to the extent that occasionally a patient may be unwilling to undergo the procedure. A study of patients' subjective experiences of MRI was therefore conducted and these were compared with those of patients undergoing computed tomography (CT). Initial interviews with 15 MRI and 15 CT patients led to the development of a questionnaire which was administered to a further 40 patients in each setting. No significant differences were found between those factors identified as unpleasant in MRI and those of CT, with the exception of the confined space of MRI; 40% of the MRI patients found this unpleasant by comparison with only 15% of the CT patients. Principal components analysis of the concerns expressed suggested three factors, to do with the machine itself, the environment of the machine, and the social interactions involved. Patients finding the procedures unpleasant tended to be those with high initial levels of anxiety, little experience of diagnostic procedures, and believing themselves to have cancer.