Search

Purpose: In south Korea, the price of biologics has been decreasing owing to patent expiration and the availability of biosimilars. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of a treatment strategy initiated with etanercept (ETN) compared with leflunomide (LFN) after a 30% reduction in the medication cost of ETN in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX-IR)., Methods: A cohort-based Markov model was designed to evaluate the lifetime cost-effectiveness of treatment sequence initiated with ETN (A) compared with 2 sequences initiated with LFN: LFN-ETN sequence (B) and LFN sequence (C). Patients transited through the treatment sequences, which consisted of sequential biologics and palliative therapy, based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) responses and the probability of discontinuation. A systematic literature review and a network meta-analysis were conducted to estimate ACR responses to ETN and LFN. Utility was estimated by mapping an equation for converting the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index score to utility weight. The costs comprised medications, outpatient visits, administration, dispensing, monitoring, palliative therapy, and treatment for adverse events. A subanalysis was conducted to identify the influence of the ETN price reduction compared with the unreduced price, and sensitivity analyses explored the uncertainty of model parameters and assumptions., Findings: The ETN sequence (A) was associated with higher costs and a gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared with both sequences initiated with LFN (B, C) throughout the lifetime of patients with RA and MTX-IR. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for strategy A versus B was ₩13,965,825 (US$1726) per QALY and that for strategy A versus C was ₩9,587,983 (US$8050) per QALY. The results indicated that strategy A was cost-effective based on the commonly cited ICER threshold of ₩20,000,000 (US$16,793) per QALY in South Korea. The robustness of the base-case analysis was confirmed using sensitivity analyses. When the unreduced medication cost of ETN was applied in a subanalysis, the ICER for strategy A versus B was ₩20,909,572 (US$17,556) per QALY and that for strategy A versus C was ₩22,334,713 (US$18,753) per QALY., Implications: This study indicated that a treatment strategy initiated with ETN was more cost-effective in patients with active RA and MTX-IR than 2 sequences initiated with LFN. The results also indicate that the reduced price of ETN affected the cost-effectiveness associated with its earlier use., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Postoperative pain management represents a significant factor of morbidity and reduced quality of life for patients, as well as a situation that substantially increases perioperative costs. Available analgesia treatments improve patient outcomes and reduce resource use associated with pain management, although with varying costs and adverse effects., Objectives: The aim of this analysis was to assess the costs and patient outcomes of parecoxib used in combination with opioids versus use of opioids alone (monotherapy) in the postoperative treatment of surgical patients in Greece., Methods: A model comparing parecoxib plus opioid treatment versus opioids alone was developed that simulated the first 3 days postsurgery. Clinical efficacy was based on a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, clinical trial that also provided the frequencies of the occurrence of clinically meaningful events (CMEs) related to opioid use for both treatment arms. Resource use associated with each CME was elicited via strictly structured questionnaire-based interviews conducted by a panel of experts (surgeons and anesthesiologists), and costs were determined from the perspective of Social Insurance in Greece (2012 euros). Treatment effectiveness was calculated in summed pain intensity scores. A series of 1-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to check the robustness of the outcomes., Results: Patients treated with parecoxib plus opioids had lower summed pain intensity scores (59.20 vs 80.80) and fewer CMEs (0.62 vs 1.04 per patient) compared with opioids alone for a 3-day period. This outcome led to a full offset of the excess cost of the addition of parecoxib and led to potential savings of €858 per patient compared with opioid use alone. Savings were mainly attributable to decreased CMEs due to reduced intensive care unit and general ward bed-days as well as to reduced physician and nurse time. Results were sensitive with regard to probabilities of occurrence or co-occurrence of CMEs (≥2 CMEs occurring simultaneously), although only to a small extent. Medication costs had a minimal impact on the results of the sensitivity analysis., Conclusions: Parecoxib may be a useful addition to opioid treatment by improving postoperative analgesic management, reducing opioid-related adverse events, and lowering per-patient treatment costs., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Iloperidone is a second-generation antipsychotic drug approved in May 2009 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the acute treatment of schizophrenia in adults. It is a piperidinyl-benzisoxazole derivative with mixed serotonin (5HT2A) and D2 dopamine antagonist properties., Objective: The purpose of this article was to review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, and role in treatment for iloperidone in schizophrenia., Methods: Scientific and clinical data were collected through searches of PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and the FDA, using the search term iloperidone, and limited to English-language articles. Reference lists were reviewed for additional publications. Dates included the beginning of the database through 2010. No limits were placed on study design., Results: In a 4-week Phase III trial, iloperidone 12 mg twice daily lowered the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores to a significantly greater extent than did placebo (-12 vs -7.1; P < 0.01). The ziprasidone active control also separated from placebo (-12.3 vs -7.1; P < 0.05). A pooled analysis of 3 Phase III trials compared iloperidone in divided doses to placebo. The primary outcome was reduction in PANSS scores. Study 1 included iloperidone 4, 8, or 12 mg/d, haloperidol as an active control, and placebo. The PANSS reduction in the 12 mg/d group was significantly greater at end point versus baseline when compared with placebo (-9.9 vs -4.6; P = 0.047). Study 2 included iloperidone 4 to 8 mg/d or 10 to 16 mg/d, risperidone 4 to 8 mg/d, or placebo. The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline to end point in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Improvement from baseline on all iloperidone doses was significantly greater than with placebo (4-8 mg/d group: -6.2, P = 0.012; 10-16 mg/d group: -7.2, P = 0.001; placebo, -2.5). Study 3 included iloperidone 12 to 16 mg/d, risperidone 6 to 8 mg/d, and placebo. The results on the primary efficacy variable, reduction in the BPRS score, was not significant for the 12 to 16 mg/d group versus placebo (-7.1 vs -5.0; P = 0.09), but was significant for the 20 to 24 mg/d iloperidone group (-8.6 vs -5.0; P = 0.01) and for the risperidone group (-11.5 vs 5.0; P < 0.001). A 52-week maintenance trial included iloperidone versus haloperidol as an active control. The primary efficacy variable was time to relapse. Comparison of mean time to relapse of the 2 arms showed no significant difference. The most common adverse events (AEs) associated with iloperidone were dizziness (5.1%-23.2%), dry mouth (5.2%-10.4%), somnolence (4%-13%), and dyspepsia (4.8%-7.8%). AEs appeared dose related. Prescribing information recommends a starting dosage of 1 mg twice daily and then titrated over 7 days to reach a target dosage of 12 to 24 mg/d. The titration is necessary to reduce the risk of orthostatic hypotension-related dizziness., Conclusions: Data support that when titrated slowly to a therapeutic dosage, iloperidone is generally well tolerated, has a favorable safety profile, and is an effective treatment option in patients with schizophrenia. Its place in therapy and performance in a typical patient population remain to be established. Slow initial titration and twice-daily dosing are potential disadvantages., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Data regarding the pharmacokinetic properties of risperidone in the Thai population are limited. A new generic tablet formulation was recently developed, but bioequivalence research is necessary to obtain marketing authorization for it in Thailand., Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the pharmacokinetic properties of risperidone and its active metabolite, 9-hydroxyrisperidone (which reportedly contributes to the drug's pharmacodynamic effects), in a newly developed generic tablet formulation (test) and a branded formulation (reference) in healthy, fasting, male Thai volunteers., Methods: A single-dose, randomized-sequence, double-blind, 2-way crossover design was used in this study. The study took place from October 21 through November 28, 2007. After a ≥10-hour overnight fast, volunteers were orally administered one 2-mg risperidone tablet, either the test formulation (Condrug International Company, Ltd.) or the reference formulation-according to the randomization schedule-followed by a 14-day washout period and administration of the alternate formulation. Blood samples were collected over a period of 96 hours. Risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone plasma concentrations were simultaneously determined using a validated HPLC/ion trap mass spectrometry method. The plasma concentration-time curves of the active moiety, risperidone, and 9-hydroxyrisperidone were generated for each volunteer, from which the C(max), T(max), AUC₀₋(last), AUC₀₋(∞), and t(½) were determined using noncompartmental analysis. The effects of formulation, period, sequence, and subject (within sequence) on pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed using ANOVA. According to regulatory requirements set forth by Thailand, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, and the US Food and Drug Administration, products meet the criteria for bioequivalence if the 90% CIs of the treatment ratios for C(max) and AUC are within the range of 0.80 to 1.25. Tolerability was assessed by patient interview, monitoring vital signs (ie, resting blood pressure, heart rate, body temperature), physical examination, and laboratory tests (ie, urinalysis, hematology, blood chemistry) before and after the study., Results: A total of 22 Thai male volunteers (mean [SD] age, 28.18 [8.27] years [range, 20.62-44.19 years]; weight, 62.43 [4.76] kg [range, 55.03-76.02 kg]; and body mass index, 21.76 [2.07] kg/m² [range, 18.9924.91 kg/m²]) completed the study. The mean (SD) relative bioavailabilities of test to reference formulations determined from AUC of the active moiety, risperidone, and 9-hydroxyrisperidone were 1.06 (0.18), 1.07 (0.29), and 1.04 (0.17), respectively. The ANOVA suggested no statistically significant effect of formulation, period, or sequence on the studied pharmacokinetic parameters of the active moiety, risperidone, or 9-hydroxyrisperidone. The 90% CIs for the natural logarithm-transformed ratios of C(max), AUC₀₋(last), and AUC₀₋(∞) were as follows: for active moiety, 0.94 to 1.03, 0.98 to 1.11, and 0.98 to 1.10, respectively; for risperidone, 0.90 to 1.10, 0.96 to 1.13, and 0.96 to 1.14, respectively; and for 9-hydroxyrisperidone, 0.91 to 1.03, 0.97 to 1.10, and 0.96 to 1.09, respectively. All met the criteria for bioequivalence. The most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) were somnolence (100.0%), orthostatic hypotension (13.6%), headache (4.5%), and syncope (2.3%). AEs were mild and disappeared within 1 day. No volunteers withdrew from the study because of AEs., Conclusions: The single-dose pharmacokinetic data in this small, all-male, selected sample of fasting, healthy volunteers met Thailand's regulatory criteria for assuming bioequivalence of the tested generic and reference 2-mg risperidone tablets. Both formulations were well tolerated., (Copyright © 2010 Excerpta Medica Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The safety and efficacy of paliperidone extended-release tablets (paliperidone ER) in patients with acute symptoms of schizophrenia have been described in 3 randomized, double-blind, 6-week, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose, Phase III clinical trials. The validity and reliability of the Personal and Social Performance (PSP) scale, both in patients with acute symptoms of schizophrenia and those with stabilized symptoms, have also been reported., Objective: The aim of this work was to estimate the treatment benefit of paliperidone ER compared with placebo in terms of improvements in personal and social functioning as measured by the PSP scale in 3 controlled clinical trials., Methods: Data were derived from 3 paliperidone ER multicenter Phase III pivotal studies of patients with acute symptoms of schizophrenia. Each study included a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group, 6-week treatment period with an open-label extension of paliperidone ER treatment. Patients were randomized to receive paliperidone ER, olanzapine 10 mg, or placebo once daily. Paliperidone ER doses were 3, 9, and 15 mg/d in 1 study; 6, 9, and 12 mg/d in another; and 6 and 12 mg/d in the third. Collectively, 1306 intent-to-treat patients received placebo or paliperidone ER in these 3 trials. Most (61.7%) were white; 21.6% were black, 8.8% were Asian, and 7.9% were of another race. The mean age ranged from 36.3 to 39.4 years across treatment groups. Multiple analyses were applied to PSP data (for which higher scores indicate better personal and social functioning) from these paliperidone ER studies: between-group minimum important difference (MID) estimates; responder analyses; between-group cumulative frequency comparisons of PSP change from baseline to end point; and number-needed-to-treat (NNT) estimates., Results: Standardized differences and effect sizes between paliperidone ER and placebo in PSP mean change from baseline to end point ranged from 0.52 to 0.85 for all paliperidone ER doses. Observed between-group differences (paliperidone ER minus placebo) in PSP mean change from baseline to end point exceeded the between-group MID of 7 points at all paliperidone ER doses. The percentage of patients achieving at least one 10-point category improvement in the PSP was higher with all paliperidone ER doses (range, 49.6%-63.6%) than placebo (33.1%) (P < 0.005). Across the distribution of all possible PSP scores, the percentage of patients achieving any level of change appeared to be greater for paliperidone ER than for placebo at all doses. Derived NNTs for improved personal and social functioning based on paliperidone ER trials ranged from 3.3 to 6.1. The improvement in personal and social functioning achieved by patients receiving paliperidone ER during the double-blind studies was maintained throughout the 52-week, open-label extension studies, as assessed using multiple definitions of response; subjects in the placebo arm during doubleblind treatment appeared to achieve and maintain improved functioning when switched to paliperidone ER for the extension studies., Conclusion: These results suggest that paliperidone ER had a meaningful treatment benefit with respect to improving personal and social functioning in these patients with acute symptoms of schizophrenia., (Copyright 2010. Published by EM Inc USA.)

Background: To make it easier for patients who are prescribed zonisamide to administer their medicine, a rapidly disintegrating oral tablet formulation has been developed., Objective: These 2 trials assessed the bioequiva-lence of a new orally dispersible tablet formulation of zonisamide (test) versus an immediate-release reference capsule., Methods: Study 1 assessed the bioequivalence of a 100-mg orally dispersible tablet versus a 100-mg reference capsule. Study 2 assessed the bioequivalence of a 300-mg test tablet versus three 100-mg reference capsules. Both trials were open-label, randomized-sequence, single-dose, 2-period, 2-treatment crossover studies in consenting healthy male volunteers aged 18 to 55 years. A 4-week washout separated treatment periods. The zonisamide test tablet was placed on the tongue and, after it had dispersed in saliva, swallowed without water. Zonisamide serum concentrations were analyzed using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay with tandem mass spectrome-try detection (lower limit of quantification, 10 ng/nL). Bioequivalence was concluded if the 90% CI of the ratio of AUC(0-72) and C(max) were within the regulatory criteria of 0.80 to 1.25. The safety profile was assessed through adverse events (AEs) and analysis of laboratory and echocardiogram parameters., Results: In study one, 36 male subjects were enrolled and randomized (mean [SD] age, 26.1 [6.9] years; weight, 77.6 [11.0] kg; race: white, 35 [97.2%], and Asian, 1 [2.8%]). Of those, 7 were withdrawn prior to completion (5 were lost to follow-up, 1 failed the drug screening, 1 withdrew due to AEs, and 1 was excluded due to undisclosed medical history). In study two, 40 male subjects were enrolled and randomized (mean [SD] age, 31.2 [10.3] years; weight, 76.1 [9.0] kg; race: white, 38 [95.0%], black, 1 [2.5%], and other, 1 [2.5%]). Of those, 2 were withdrawn prior to completion (1 failed the urine drug screening and 1 withdrew consent). The ratios (90% CIs) of AUC(0-72) for the 100-mg and 300-mg test formulations were 1.00 (0.98-1.02) and 1.00 (0.98-1.01), respectively. The ratios (90% CIs) of C(max) were 0.97 (0.94-1.00) and 0.98 (0.95-1.00). A total of 25 subjects experienced treatment-emergent AEs in study 1; of these, 8 events in 3 patients were considered to be possibly or probably related to study drug administration. A total of 21 subjects experienced treatment-emergent AEs in study 2; of these, 11 events in 6 subjects were considered to be possibly or probably related to study drug administration. All AEs and laboratory and ECG findings were similar between formulations., Conclusions: The test formulation of zonisamide met regulatory criteria for bioequivalence to the reference formulation in these healthy male volunteers. Both formulations were generally well tolerated at both dose levels.

Background: Paliperidone, which is available in extended-release (ER) tablets, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2007 for the acute and maintenance treatment of schizophrenia. It is the seventh second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) to be introduced to the US market. Paliperidone is the major active metabolite of risperidone, an established anti-psychotic agent., Objective: This article reviews the available literature on the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and tolerability of paliperidone., Methods: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE using the terms paliperidone, 9-hydroxy-risperidone, and Invega was performed for the years 1950 through December 2007. Articles that discussed the efficacy and tolerability of 9-hydroxy-risperidone formed as a metabolite of risperidone were excluded; all others were included. Abstracts and posters presented at recent national and international scientific meetings were also included in the review., Results: At therapeutic doses (3-12 mg), paliperidone ER follows linear pharmacokinetics. Like that of its parent drug, paliperidone's mechanism of action is thought to be through antagonistic actions at dopamine D(2) and serotonin-2A receptors. In vivo studies suggest that the cytochrome P450 enzyme system plays a minimal role in paliperidone metabolism, with none of the metabolites accounting for >10% of a dose. The majority (59%) of paliperidone is eliminated through the kidneys as unchanged drug. The results of three 6-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trials indicated the efficacy of paliperidone ER compared with placebo in the treatment of acute exacerbations of schizophrenia, with response rates ranging from 39.8% to 61.0% for paliperidone ER, compared with 18.3% to 34.0% for placebo. During a 52-week, double-blind, relapse-prevention trial, the time to 25% of patients experiencing a recurrence was 83 days for paliperidone ER, compared with 23 days for placebo. The proportions of patients in the 6-week trials who reported at least 1 extrapyramidal symptom-related adverse event were 13%, 10%, 25%, 26%, and 24% for paliperidone ER 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 mg/d, respectively; the pooled incidence rate was not statistically different from that with placebo (11%). Headache and insomnia were the most common adverse events in patients treated with paliperidone ER in the 6-week trials (pooled data: 11%-18% and 4%-14%, respectively). In the relapse-prevention trial, the incidence of prolactin-related adverse events was 4% for paliperidone ER and 0% for placebo., Conclusions: Current evidence supports the efficacy and tolerability of paliperidone ER in the acute and long-term treatment of schizophrenia. Randomized, head-to-head comparisons with other SGAs, particularly risperidone, are needed to define the role of paliperidone ER in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Background: Compared with nonselective NSAIDs, cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-selective inhibitors have been associated with a lower incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers (in short-term endoscopic studies) and ulcer complications (in long-term trials)., Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of valdecoxib 20 mg BID and naproxen 500 mg BID, administered for 6.5 days, on the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) mucosa of healthy older subjects (aged 65-75 years) as assessed by UGI endoscopy., Methods: In this multicenter, double-blind, active-comparator, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, eligible subjects who were free of NSAID or COX-2-selective inhibitor use for 2 weeks and who had normal UGI mucosa (mucosal grading score of 0, based on endoscopic evaluation of both the stomach and duodenum) were randomized. Serologic testing for Helicobacter pylori antibodies was conducted at baseline. No antiulcer medications were permitted. The primary end point was the incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers (gastric or duodenal mucosal grading score of 7, as indicated by any lesion with unequivocal depth > or =3 mm in diameter) after 6.5 days of blinded treatment with valdecoxib, naproxen, or placebo. Secondary end points were incidence of gastric ulcers, duodenal ulcers, and gastroduodenal erosions/ulcers, and the incidence of > or =11 gastroduodenal erosions/ulcers. All documented adverse events were self-reported by subjects or were observed by investigators., Results: Sixty-one patients were randomized to receive valdecoxib, 60 to naproxen, and 60 to placebo. Mean (SD) subject age was 68.8 (3.25) years in the valdecoxib group, 68.6 (2.76) years in the naproxen group, and 68.6 (3.14) years in the placebo group (P = NS). In the valdecoxib and naproxen groups, 47.5% and 58.3% of subjects were female, respectively, compared with 56.7% of the placebo group (P = NS). Valdecoxib and placebo were associated with significantly lower incidences of gastroduodenal ulcers than naproxen (1.6% [1 gastroduodenal ulcer/61 patients] and 1.7% [1/59], respectively, vs 22.0% [13/59]; P < 0.001). Compared with naproxen, both valdecoxib and placebo were associated with significantly lower incidences of gastric (1.6% [1/61] and 1.7% [1/59] vs 15.3% [9/59]; both, P < 0.03) and duodenal ulcers (0% [0/61] and 0% [0/59] vs 8.5% [5/59]; both,P < 0.03). In all cases, the incidence of ulcers with valdecoxib was not significantly different from placebo. Results were similar for any erosions/ulcers, and when analyzed by H pylori status. The number of adverse events was low in each group., Conclusion: In these healthy older subjects (aged 65-75 years), valdecoxib 20 mg BID was associated with a significantly lower rate of gastroduodenal, gastric, and duodenal ulcers than naproxen 500 mg BID, even after 6.5 days of therapy.

Background: Valdecoxib, a cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 specific inhibitor, is indicated for relief of the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and primary dysmenorrhea. Therapeutic doses of COX-2 specific inhibitors are as effective as nonspecific nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in reducing inflammatory pain while sparing the gastrointestinal and platelet toxicity associated with nonspecific COX-1 inhibition., Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the analgesic efficacy and tolerability of valdecoxib 40 mg/d compared with placebo in the treatment of chronic low back pain., Methods: This 4-week, prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted at 37 centers across the United States and 5 centers in Canada. Patients aged > or =18 years with chronic low back pain in flare were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive valdecoxib 40-mg/d or placebo tablets, once daily for 4 weeks. Patients rated low back pain intensity on a visual analog scale and completed the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) at each visit., Results: Two hundred ninety-three patients were enrolled. The valdecoxib group comprised 148 patients (81 women, 67 men; mean [SD] age, 48.6 [13.3] years; mean [SD] body weight, 86.6 [20.9] kg), and the placebo group included 145 patients (85 women, 60 men; mean [SD] age, 48.7 [12.6] years; mean [SD] body weight, 85.6 [19.9] kg). Of the enrolled patients, 249 completed the study: 134 patients (91%) who received valdecoxib and 115 patients (79%) who received placebo. No statistically significant differences in patient baseline characteristics were noted between treatment groups, except in response to 1 mBPI-SF question; patients in the valdecoxib group reported significantly greater interference in relations with other people due to pain than did those in the placebo group (P = 0.048). Changes from baseline in low back pain intensity were significantly greater in valdecoxib-treated patients at each assessment (all, P < 0.001 vs placebo). Pain scores on the mBPI-SF indicated significantly greater pain relief with valdecoxib at each assessment (all, P < or = 0.014 vs placebo). Improvements in mean Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire score with valdecoxib were significantly greater than with placebo at each assessment (all, P < or = 0.003). Although the overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was significantly higher among patients receiving valdecoxib than those receiving placebo (35.1% vs 24.1%, respectively; P = 0.042), no significant differences were found between groups for the incidence of any individual AE. Most AEs (89% [77/87 total events]) were mild or moderate in severity., Conclusions: In this study of patients with chronic low back pain, valdecoxib 40 mg/d provided rapid relief (within 1 week) and consistent relief (over 4 weeks). In addition, significant improvement in function and decreased disability were found with valdecoxib compared with placebo.

Background: Thrombotic events have been reported with the use of antipsychotic compounds, although the incidence, predisposing factors, and biological mechanisms associated with these events in psychiatric patients are subject to debate., Objective: The in vitro actions of risperidone and its active metabolite 9-hydroxy-risperidone (9-OH-risperidone) on human platelet function, plasma coagulation, and fibrinolysis were examined to explore whether hematologic effects might be a mechanism for thrombotic events with these compounds., Methods: Blood was donated by healthy white male subjects who were free of medications (particularly acetylsalicylic acid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory compounds). Platelet shape change and adhesion/aggregation reactions to risperidone and 9-OH-risperidone induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP), collagen, epinephrine, and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) were tested in human platelet-rich plasma. Arachidonic acid metabolism was assessed in human platelets and rat aortic rings. Plasma coagulation was tested in human platelet-poor plasma. Fibrinolysis was measured in human whole blood., Results: The 12 study subjects ranged in age from 20 to 40 years (median age 30 years). At concentrations of 1 x 10(-5) mol/L (approximately 4180 ng/mL), neither risperidone nor 9-OH-risperidone induced platelet shape change or aggregation, amplified reactions to ADP, or modified platelet adhesion/aggregation induced by collagen or ADP, but they did attenuate epinephrine-induced platelet aggregation (-50% in the case of 9-OH-risperidone; P < 0.05) and 5-HT-induced platelet aggregation (drug concentrations yielding 50% inhibition of 5-HT-induced platelet aggregation, 0.5 and 0.2 ng/mL, respectively). Cyclooxygenase, thromboxane A2 synthase, 12-lipoxygenase, prostacyclin synthase, plasma coagulation, and fibrinolysis were unaffected., Conclusions: Risperidone and 9-OH-risperidone reduced epinephrine- and 5-HT-induced human platelet aggregation but did not significantly alter other measures of platelet function, plasma coagulation, or fibrinolysis in vitro.

Background: Parecoxib sodium is an injectable cyclooxygenase-2-specific inhibitor developed for the treatment of acute pain. The analgesic efficacy of IV and IM parecoxib has been demonstrated in previous pilot studies using the post-oral surgery pain model., Objective: This study was conducted to characterize the analgesic efficacy of parecoxib in healthy adults after oral surgery while comparing the efficacy and tolerability of the IV and IM routes of administration., Methods: This was a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo- and active-controlled, single-dose, single-center trial. Patients experiencing moderate to severe post-operative pain after the extraction of > or =2 impacted third molars were randomized to receive parecoxib sodium 20 mg IM, 20 mg IV, 40 mg IM, or 40 mg IV; ketorolac tromethamine 60 mg IM; or placebo. Patients assessed pain intensity and pain relief (PR) at baseline and at designated intervals for 24 hours after administration of study medication or until rescue medication was taken. Analgesic efficacy was assessed in terms of time-specific pain intensity difference (PID) and PR, time to onset of analgesia, and time to use of rescue medication., Results: Three hundred four patients were randomized to treatment. Parecoxib sodium 20 and 40 mg IM or IV and ketorolac 60 mg IM were significantly superior to placebo in PID, PR, time to onset of analgesia, and time to use of rescue medication (P < or = 0.05). Equal IV and IM doses of parecoxib were comparable on these measures; however, time to use of rescue medication was longer with IM compared with IV administration. Both doses of parecoxib were comparable to ketorolac 60 mg IM in time to onset of analgesia, but parecoxib 40 mg had a significantly longer duration of action (P < or = 0.05). The few statistically significant differences in PID and PR between parecoxib 40 mg and ketorolac favored ketorolac versus parecoxib 40 mg IV at earlier time points and parecoxib 40 mg IM versus ketorolac at later time points (P < or = 0.05). All treatments were well tolerated., Conclusions: Parecoxib IV and IM provided effective analgesia. The 40-mg dose was comparable to ketorolac 60 mg on most measures of analgesia but had a longer duration of action.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic disease affecting 0.8% of the population. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs reduce the pain and inflammation of RA and improve mobility but do not slow the progression of joint damage. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), which limit potentially irreversible joint damage, may influence the course of disease progression. This review describes the recently approved DMARD leflunomide, an isoxazole-based immunomodulator. Unlike other DMARDs, leflunomide arrests the growth of activated lymphocytes by inhibiting the enzyme dihydroorotate dehydrogenase, a critical link in the production of uridine monophosphate. Leflunomide is rapidly metabolized to the active major metabolite A77 1726, which is responsible for the drug's pharmacologic activity. Leflunomide has exerted inhibitory activity in animal models of RA. Its clinical efficacy has been demonstrated in a number of controlled trials. In two multinational 52-week studies and two 24-week studies, all leflunomide-treated patients received an initial loading dose of 100 mg for 3 days, followed by 20 mg/d. The effects on the signs and symptoms of RA were evaluated using the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 responder index, tender and swollen joint counts and scores, patients' and physician's global assessments, and pain intensity index. Erosions and joint-space narrowing were assessed by radiography. Compared with placebo, leflunomide significantly improved the signs and symptoms of RA (41%-64% improvement) by ACR 20 responder criteria (P < 0.001). Leflunomide, methotrexate, and sulfasalazine were equally effective in terms of symptom outcomes. In terms of retarding the progression of disease, leflunomide was significantly superior to placebo, with no consistent difference from methotrexate or sulfasalazine. In a trial using a combination of leflunomide and methotrexate therapy, 53% of patients were responders by ACR 20 criteria. Adverse effects in RA patients receiving leflunomide included diarrhea, elevated liver enzymes, alopecia, and rash. Additional adverse events occurring with a frequency >5% included allergic reaction, asthenia, abdominal pain, back pain, and hypertension, among others. Thus leflunomide may be used in selected RA patients (ie, those starting RA therapy for the first time or failing earlier DMARD therapy). However, the product labeling requires monthly monitoring of liver enzymes until stable concentrations are reached. Other labeled warnings include a risk of immunosuppression and an increased risk of fetal death or teratogenic effects in pregnant women. Methotrexate, which is also hepatotoxic, is usually the initial DMARD recommended for use in patients with aggressive RA.