Search

Abstract: Grade 3 primary graft dysfunction (PGD3) represents the most important risk factor for patient mortality during the first year after lung transplantation (LTX). We investigated whether pretransplant pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a risk factor for the development of PGD3. This retrospective, single‐center cohort study included 96 candidates undergoing right heart catheterization (RHC) prior to being listed for LTX between March 2000 and October 2015. Based on their mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) levels, the patients were classified into 3 groups: (1) <25 mm Hg, (2) 25‐34 mm Hg and (3) ≥35 mm Hg. Forty‐seven patients were classified in group 1, 31 in group 2, and 18 in group 3. Fifteen recipients (16%, 95%‐CI 8‐23) developed PGD3. In the univariate analysis, the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) compared to COPD (OR: 7.06, P = .005), blood transfusion >1000 mL during surgery (OR: 5.25, P = .005), the need for intra‐operative cardio‐pulmonary bypass (CPB) or extra‐corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (OR: 4, P = .027), mPAP (OR 1.06, P = .007) and serum high density lipoprotein‐cholesterol (HDL‐C) (OR 0.09, P = .005) were associated with PGD3. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, only HDL‐C (OR 0.10, P = .016) was associated with PGD3 based on our single‐center cohort data analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oberkofler CE, Stocker R, Raptis DA, Stover JF, Schuepbach RA, Müllhaupt B, Dutkowski P, Clavien P-A, Béchir M. Same quality - higher price? The paradox of allocation: the first national single center analysis after the implementation of the new Swiss transplantation law: the ICU view. Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 921-928. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: This study was undertaken as the first national single-center analysis to assess the impact of the new Swiss transplantation law on patient selection, intensive care unit (ICU) complications, outcome, and, in particular, costs in liver transplant recipients treated in our surgical ICU. The first 35 consecutive liver transplant recipients following the new act were compared with the last 35 liver transplant recipients preceding July 1, 2007. Following execution of the new law, recipients were in poorer condition, reflected by significant higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores (12 vs. 22; p = 0.006). Furthermore, the MELD group obtained more renal replacement therapies (40.0% vs. 14.3%; p = 0.015). Cumulative one-yr patient survival was comparable in both groups (91.4% vs. 80.1%, p = 0.22). Finally, the additional costs per single case increased 27 000 Euros after the adoption of the new law. Our data serve as an example that political decisions influence patient's selection, and, in turn, complications, finally leading to higher costs of medical treatment. Liver graft allocation according to the MELD system may save lives at the price of increased intensive care efforts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]