1. Improved Harris Hawks Optimizer with chaotic maps and opposition-based learning for task scheduling in cloud environment.
- Author
-
Ghafari, R. and Mansouri, N.
- Subjects
- *
DIFFERENTIAL evolution , *SCHEDULING , *CUSTOMER satisfaction , *PRODUCTION scheduling , *ENERGY consumption - Abstract
Scheduling tasks in the cloud system is the main issue that needs to be addressed in order to improve customer satisfaction and system performance. This paper proposes DCOHHOTS, a novel multi-objective task scheduling algorithm based on a modified Harris hawks optimizer. In overall, this paper has two main stages. As the first step, DCOHHO is introduced as a new version of Harris Hawks Optimizer. Using the Differential Evolution algorithm, an optimal configuration is selected from the chaotic map, the opposition-based learning, and the ratio of the population. In order to improve the performance of the Harris Hawks Optimizer, this optimal configuration is applied to initialize the hawk's position. In the second stage, DCOHHOTS, a DCOHHO-based Task Scheduling algorithm, is proposed. Multi-objective behavior in the proposed task scheduling algorithm optimizes resource utilization to decrease the makespan, energy consumption, and execution cost. Moreover, prioritizing tasks before submitting them to the scheduler is done using the hierarchical process in the DCOHHOTS algorithm. For the purpose of investigating the performance of the proposed DCOHHO algorithm, a number of experiments are conducted using 20 standard functions and twelve algorithms. The experimental results demonstrate that the DCOHHO algorithm is superior at determining the optimal test function solutions. Additionally, makespan, execution cost, resource utilization, and energy efficiency of DCOHHOTS task scheduling algorithms are analyzed. Compared to existing algorithms, the proposed algorithm saves up to 16% energy in heavy loads. Additionally, resource utilization has increased by 17%. Compared to the conventional algorithm, the proposed algorithm reduced makepan and execution cost by 26% and 8%, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF