Search

One way to increase art appreciation is to create congruency between the actions performed by the artist and the actions performed by the viewer. Leder, Bar, and Topolinski (2012) successfully created such a link by asking participants to make either stroking or stippling motions while viewing stroke-style and pointillist-style paintings. We carried out a direct replication of Leder et al. (2012) in Experiment 1 but failed to reproduce their results. In Experiment 2, we achieved the desired cross-over interaction between image and action but only when the relationship was made more transparent. Experiment 3 demonstrated that this effect requires a motor component and cannot be reproduced by simply hearing the sounds associated with drawing production. Experiment 4 investigated whether either an external manipulation or a self-report measure of awareness of the image–action match modulated the liking ratings, in addition to artwork familiarity and participants’ own hypotheses regarding the direction of the image–action effect. Participants who predicted that congruent relationships between what they saw and what they did would increase liking showed enhanced congruency effects. The links between historical production and contemporary exposure to art may then be an overt rather than covert process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights: [•] The nature of the mind-mindedness construct was investigated. [•] Adults’ mind-minded descriptions of significant others correlate positively. [•] Mind-minded descriptions of significant others are unrelated to those of famous people/paintings. [•] Mind-mindedness appears not to be a trait-like quality. [•] These findings may help inform our understanding of theory of mind in adulthood. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]