Search

Abstract: In this paper we study how to compute compact straight-line drawings of planar graphs with a limited number of crossings per edge. We prove that every outerplanar graph can be drawn in area using a sub-linear number of crossings per edge, and that for any given number , every outerplanar graph admits an area drawing with crossing per edge. The drawing algorithms run in linear time and can be also generalized to another meaningful sub-family of series–parallel graphs with bounded vertex-degree. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: The contribution of this paper is twofold. It presents a new approach to the matched drawability problem of pairs of planar graphs and it provides four algorithms based on this approach for drawing the pairs , , and . Further, it initiates the study of the matched drawability of triples of planar graphs: it presents an algorithm to compute a matched drawing of a triple of cycles and an algorithm to compute a matched drawing of a caterpillar and two unlabeled level planar graphs. The results extend previous work on the subject and relate to existing literature about simultaneous embeddability and unlabeled level planarity. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Given a graph G with n vertices and a set S of n points in the plane, a point-set embedding of G on S is a planar drawing such that each vertex of G is mapped to a distinct point of S. A geometric point-set embedding is a point-set embedding with no edge bends. This paper studies the following problem: The input is a set S of n points, a planar graph G with n vertices, and a geometric point-set embedding of a subgraph on a subset of S. The desired output is a point-set embedding of G on S that includes the given partial drawing of . We concentrate on trees and show how to compute the output in time in a real-RAM model and with at most edges with at most bends, where k is the number of vertices of the given subdrawing. We also prove that there are instances of the problem which require at least bends on edges. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Visibility representations are a well-known paradigm to represent graphs. From a high-level perspective, a visibility representation of a graph G maps the vertices of G to non-overlapping geometric objects and the edges of G to visibilities, i.e., segments that do not intersect any geometric object other than at their end-points. In this paper, we initiate the study of 2.5D box visibility representations (2.5D-BRs) where vertices are mapped to 3D boxes having the bottom face in the plane z = 0 and edges are unobstructed lines of sight parallel to the x - or y -axis. We prove that: ( i ) Every complete bipartite graph admits a 2.5D-BR; ( i i ) The complete graph K n admits a 2.5D-BR if and only if n ⩽ 19 ; ( i i i ) Every graph with pathwidth at most 7 admits a 2.5D-BR, which can be computed in linear time. We then turn our attention to 2.5D grid box representations (2.5D-GBRs), which are 2.5D-BRs such that the bottom face of every box is a unit square at integer coordinates. We show that an n -vertex graph that admits a 2.5D-GBR has at most 4 n − 6 n edges and this bound is tight. Finally, we prove that deciding whether a given graph G admits a 2.5D-GBR with a given footprint is NP-complete (the footprint of a 2.5D-BR Γ is the set of bottom faces of the boxes in Γ). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: We introduce and study a generalization of the well-known region of influence proximity drawings, called -proximity drawings. Intuitively, given a definition of proximity and two real numbers and , an -proximity drawing of a graph is a planar straight-line drawing Γ such that: (i) for every pair of adjacent vertices u, v, their proximity region “shrunk” by the multiplicative factor does not contain any vertices of Γ; (ii) for every pair of non-adjacent vertices u, v, their proximity region “expanded” by the factor contains some vertices of Γ other than u and v. In particular, the locations of the vertices in such a drawing do not always completely determine which edges must be present/absent, giving us some freedom of choice. We show that this generalization significantly enlarges the family of representable planar graphs for relevant definitions of proximity drawings, including Gabriel drawings, Delaunay drawings, and β-drawings, even for arbitrarily small values of and . We also study the extremal case of -proximity drawings, which generalize the well-known weak proximity drawing paradigm. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]