1. Untitled.
- Subjects
SOCIAL values ,INDUCTIVE effect ,SOCIOLOGY ,PSYCHOLOGY ,SENSORY perception - Abstract
A series of recent publications in sociology, moral psychology, and social psychology have voiced concern about the existence of "sacred" values within the social sciences. More specifically, such critics contend that the construction of sacred victims (i.e. the morally, and thus empirically inviolable) in sociology and other disciplines has biased both theory construction and the gathering and consideration of evidence. This paper argues that these contributions have incorrectly directed analysis at the field's communicated content, the opus operatum. As argued here, the correct level of analysis, one which can account for the existence of sacred valuations within a scientific field (i.e. immunity from peer criticism) is more so at the sub-cognitive, generative mental schemata more specifically, which as principles of composition are within, but therefore not of, perception. This paper outlines the content of such heuristics (oppressor-victim binaries), the psychological orientation they engender, their origin and rationalization amid and under the express theorization within the field, the vulnerabilities of intellectual fields their adoption reveal, and the recursive, selfreinforcing effect they have on the field (i.e. self-evidency resulting from accumulations of scholarship). The paper concludes with noting that areas of sociology will remain in an assimilationist phase (in the Piagetian sense) if such modus operandi are not brought into explicit recognition, hence discussion, within the discipline. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019