Search

Purpose: Previous reports indicate that "eye fatigue" occurs in roughly 60 % of the adult population using digital devices and may negatively impact quality of life. However, the construct of eye fatigue remains poorly understood. The goal of this study was to quantify the relationship among symptoms most frequently associated with eye fatigue in those using digital devices.Methods: Six hundred and two soft contact lens (SCL) wearers and 127 non-contact lens (non-CL) wearers who reported using digital devices at least 4 hours per day completed a questionnaire assessing the frequency and severity of ten symptoms commonly associated with digital device-related eye fatigue. Subjective ratings were made separately for each symptom using unipolar, five-point Likert scales.Results: From the initial pool of respondents, 89 % of the SCL wearers reported experiencing eye fatigue more than once per month, while over 60 % reported more than once per week. Notably, eye fatigue frequency did not differ between the soft contact and non-contact lens groups. Although eye strain/pain, dryness, and tired eyes were the most frequently endorsed symptoms by both groups, only dryness and eye irritation were significant factors that discriminated the SCL from the non-CL wearers on the basis of frequency and severity. Principal component analysis indicated that eye strain/pain, soreness, tired eyes, and headaches may comprise a "primary sensations" factor, whereas burning, eye irritation, tearing and dryness comprise a "secondary or surface sensations" factor, and blurred/double vision and words move/float comprise a "visual sensations" factor. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of frequency and severity ratings for SCL wearers yielded excellent fits (RMSEA = 0.046 and 0.050, respectively) with construct reliabilities ranging from 0.729 to 0.824.Conclusion: Frequent and severe eye fatigue is highly prevalent among both soft contact lens and non-contact lens wearers. Those utilizing SCL do not experience symptoms at higher frequency or severity. Key descriptors of digital eye fatigue have been identified and may then be used to help identify and evaluate specific causative, palliative, or ameliorating factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Accommodative micro-fluctuations (AMF) are small dioptric changes during accommodation. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare changes in AMF when wearing silicone hydrogel contact lenses of two different optical designs.Methods: A multi-centre, randomised, cross-over, non-dispensing study was conducted on 68 adapted contact lens wearers aged 25-35 years to compare AMF responses to a spherical and aspheric silicone hydrogel (comfilcon A) lens designs. A Righton Speedy "i" series Auto Refractometer in accommodation analyser mode was utilized before and after reading a standard text in font size 8 on an iPhone 5 for 20 min at a 25 cm viewing distance. Phone screen brightness was set by automatic adjustment mode and ambient illumination was controlled at all sites.Results: Mean ± SD AMF change from before to after the reading task was 2.25 ± 5.6 and 0.13 ± 5.7 (relative values) for the spherical and aspheric lens designs, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.017, Paired t-test).Conclusions: The smaller change in AMF when using an aspheric lens design suggests reduced ciliary muscle stress when reading print on a smart phone at a close distance for short periods (20 min). Contact lens wearers who frequently use digital devices and are experiencing eye strain may benefit from switching from a spherical design to one that incorporates aspheric optics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Digital eye strain encompasses a range of ocular and visual symptoms across all age groups. Recently, symptoms associated with accommodative or binocular vision stress have become a major problem, especially in young individuals. The purpose of this prospective, single-blinded study was to objectively quantify the accommodative response and visual performance of low-add soft contact lenses (CLs) in young non-presbyopic individuals.Methods: A daily disposable low-add bifocal design lens (low-add CL) was tested. It employs a centre-distance optical zone and peripheral zone with the added power of +0.50 D to support near vision. Sixteen subjects aged 20-39 years were enrolled in the study. Refractive state and accommodation were measured using an open-field autorefractor with three target vergences, namely, -0.20 D, -2.5 D, and -4.0 D. Binocular visual acuity at high (100%) and low (40%, 20%) contrast and reading ability were assessed. Monofocal soft CLs were used as controls.Results: Accommodative response with low-add CLs was significantly smaller than those with two monofocal CL wearing conditions, i.e., at 40 cm (2.5 D of stimulus) and 25 cm (4.0 D of stimulus) (all p < 0.05). The 20% contrast visual acuity at distance was significantly better with low-add CLs and second-time monofocal CLs compared to first-time monofocal CLs (all p < 0.05). The reading ability was not significantly different.Conclusions: Quantification of accommodative response and visual performance demonstrated that using low-add CLs alleviated the accommodation under the near-vision condition, without sacrificing distance vision, in non-presbyopes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the effects of virtual reality headset wear and conventional desktop computer display use on ocular surface and tear film parameters.Methods: Twenty computer operators were enrolled in a prospective, investigator-masked, randomised crossover study. On separate days, participants were randomised to 40 min of continuous virtual reality headset wear or conventional desktop computer display use. Outer eyelid and corneal temperatures, tear film lipid layer grade, and non-invasive tear film breakup time were measured at baseline and immediately following the 40-minute exposure period.Results: Virtual reality headset wear resulted in increases in outer eyelid (mean difference +0.5 ± 0.6 °C; p < 0.001) and corneal temperatures (mean difference, +0.4 ± 0.6 °C; p = 0.004), relative to conventional desktop computer display use. These increases were associated with significant improvements in tear film lipid layer grade (median difference, +1 grade; interquartile range, 0 to +2 grades; p < 0.001) and non-invasive tear film breakup time (mean difference, +7.2 ± 12.4 s; p = 0.02).Conclusions: Clinically significant improvements in lipid layer thickness and tear film stability were observed with virtual reality headset wear, despite producing only modest increases in ocular temperatures relative to conventional desktop computer display use. These findings would suggest that virtual reality headset wear demonstrates potential for dry eye relief for computer operators in the modern workplace environment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate the benefits on the eyes of taking breaks based on the 20-20-20 rule. Bespoke computer software using the laptop webcam to assess user breaks, eye gaze and blinking, and emitting personalized reminders of breaks based on the 20-20-20 rule, was downloaded onto the laptops of 29 symptomatic computer users. Digital eye strain (DES), binocular vision and dry eye were assessed before and after two weeks of using the reminders and one week after the discontinuation of the strategy. Binocular measurements included visual acuity, accommodative posture, stereopsis, fixation disparity, ocular alignment, accommodative facility, positive/negative vergences and near point of convergence. Symptoms were evaluated using the computer vision syndrome questionnaire, ocular surface disease index (OSDI), and symptom assessment in dry eye questionnaire (SANDE) versions one and two. Dry eye signs were assessed by measuring tear meniscus height, conjunctival redness, blink rate and incomplete blinking, lipid layer thickness, non-invasive keratograph break-up time, corneal and conjunctival staining and lid wiper epitheliopathy. A decrease in the duration of computer work and the duration of breaks, along with an increase in the number of breaks taken per day was observed as a result of the 20-20-20 rule reminders (p ≤ 0.015). No changes on any binocular parameter were observed after the management period (p ≥ 0.051), except for an increase in accommodative facility (p = 0.010). Dry eye symptoms and DES decreased with the rule reminders (p ≤ 0.045), although this improvement was not maintained one week after discontinuation (p > 0.05). No changes on any ocular surface and tear film parameter were observed with the rule reminders (p ≥ 0.089). The 20-20-20 rule is an effective strategy for reducing DES and dry eye symptoms, although 2 weeks was not enough to considerably improve binocular vision or dry eye signs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]