Search

The piece of evidence can be defined as the imposition of a truth, may it be a de facto truth, namely an existential one, or logical, moral, scientific, etc. to my knowledgeable consciousness. The paper underlines the means by which this imposition operates within Romanian Criminal law. In science, it operates by experience, in logics by demonstration, in law by documents, witnesses, examinations, on site investigation, clues, and presumptions. But a piece of evidence, as it is defined, represents an element of fact, and this must be brought to the attention of judiciary bodies as it is. So, there has to be an instrument, a means by which the facts, namely the evidence, must be brought to the attention of the judiciary bodies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper is about a necessary regulatory. The institution regards the final solutions and those which are found to be inconsistent with the law. Over the time, they have received different solutions, although they refer to identical cases or about the same. The regulation considers a new composition of the Supreme Court that hears the appeal in the interest of the law; it also provides a new composition of the bench, the need for reasoned opinions of several Romanian and European high courts, as well as a deadline for settlement and communication of the solution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper, the concept of criminal law is examined by the criminal doctrine in two ways. In a broad sense, as rule or bill of criminal law, sense that is taken into account by the legislator through the provisions of article 141 of the Criminal Code. In another sense (narrow), the concept of criminal law means the normative act issued by the Parliament after a special procedure and which contains rules of criminal law (article 76 of the Constitution) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]