Search

OBJECTIVES: Significant practice variation exists in the amount of resuscitative IV fluid given to patients with sepsis. Current research suggests equipoise between a tightly restrictive or more liberal strategy but data is lacking on a wider range of resuscitation practices. We sought to examine the relationship between a wide range of fluid resuscitation practices and sepsis mortality and then identify the primary driver of this practice variation. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of the Premier Healthcare Database. SETTING: Six hundred twelve U.S. hospitals. PATIENTS: Patients with sepsis and septic shock admitted from the emergency department to the ICU from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019. INTERVENTIONS: The volume of resuscitative IV fluid administered before the end of hospital day-1 and mortality. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In total, 190,682 patients with sepsis and septic shock were included in the analysis. Based upon patient characteristics and illness severity, we predicted that physicians should prescribe patients with sepsis a narrow mean range of IV fluid (95% range, 3.6-4.5 L). Instead, we observed wide variation in the mean IV fluids administered (95% range, 1.7-7.4 L). After splitting the patients into five groups based upon attending physician practice, we observed patients in the moderate group (4.0 L; interquartile range [IQR], 2.4-5.1 L) experienced a 2.5% reduction in risk-adjusted mortality compared with either the very low (1.6 L; IQR, 1.0-2.5 L) or very high (6.1 L; IQR, 4.0-9.0 L) fluid groups p < 0.01). An analysis of within- and betweenhospital IV fluid resuscitation practices showed that physician variation within hospitals instead of practice differences between hospitals accounts for the observed variation. CONCLUSIONS: Individual physician practice drives excess variation in the amount of IV fluid given to patients with sepsis. A moderate approach to IV fluid resuscitation is associated with decreased sepsis mortality and should be tested in future randomized controlled trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the metabolomic profiles associated with different immune activation states in sepsis patients. DESIGN: Subgroup analysis of the PROVIDE (a Personalized Randomized trial of Validation and restoration of Immune Dysfunction in severe infections and Sepsis) prospective clinical study. SETTING: Results of the PROVIDE study showed that patients with sepsis may be classified into three states of immune activation: 1) macrophage-activation-like syndrome (MALS) characterized by hyperinflammation, sepsis-induced immunoparalysis, and 3) unclassified or intermediate patients without severe immune dysregulation. PATIENTS OR SUBJECTS: Two hundred ten patients from 14 clinical sites in Greece meeting the Sepsis-3 definitions with lung infection, acute cholangitis, or primary bacteremia. INTERVENTIONS: During our comparison, we did not perform any intervention. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Untargeted metabolomics analysis was performed on plasma samples from 210 patients (a total of 1394 products). Differential abundance analysis identified 221 significantly different metabolites across the immune states. Metabolites were enriched in pathways related to ubiquinone biosynthesis, tyrosine metabolism, and tryptophan metabolism when comparing MALS to immunoparalysis and unclassified patients. When comparing MALS to unclassified, 312 significantly different metabolites were found, and pathway analysis indicated enrichment in multiple pathways. Comparing immunoparalysis to unclassified patients revealed only two differentially regulated metabolites. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest distinct metabolic dysregulation patterns associated with different immune dysfunctions in sepsis: the strongest metabolic dysregulation is associated with MALS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: Sepsis survivors have greater healthcare use than those surviving hospitalizations for other reasons, yet factors associated with greater healthcare use in this population remain ill-defined. Rural Americans are older, have more chronic illnesses, and face unique barriers to healthcare access, which could affect postsepsis healthcare use. Therefore, we compared healthcare use and expenditures among rural and urban sepsis survivors. We hypothesized that rural survivors would have greater healthcare use and expenditures. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: To test this hypothesis, we used data from 106,189 adult survivors of a sepsis hospitalization included in the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database and Medicare Supplemental database between 2013 and 2018. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We identified hospitalizations for severe sepsis and septic shock using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition (ICD-9) or 1CD-10 codes. We used Metropolitan Statistical Area classifications to categorize rurality. We measured emergency department (ED) visits, inpatient hospitalizations, skilled nursing facility admissions, primary care visits, physical therapy visits, occupational therapy visits, and home healthcare visits for the year following sepsis hospitalizations. We calculated the total expenditures for each of these categories. We compared outcomes between rural and urban patients using multivariable regression and adjusted for covariates. After adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, admission type, insurance type, U.S. Census Bureau region, employment status, and sepsis severity, those living in rural areas had 17% greater odds of having an ED visit (odds ratio [OR] 1.17; 95% CI, 1.13-1.22; p < 0.001), 9% lower odds of having a primary care visit (OR 0.91; 95% CI, 0.87-0.94; p < 0.001), and 12% lower odds of receiving home healthcare (OR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.84-0.93; p < 0.001). Despite higher levels of ED use and equivalent levels of hospital readmissions, expenditures in these areas were 14% (OR 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.91; p < 0.001) and 9% (OR 0.91; 95% CI, 0.87-0.96; p < 0.001) lower among rural survivors, respectively, suggesting these services may be used for lower-acuity conditions. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort study, we report important differences in healthcare use and expenditures between rural and urban sepsis survivors. Future research and policy work is needed to understand how best to optimize sepsis survivorship across the urban-rural continuum. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether mortality differed between initial invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) followed by delayed IMV in immunocompromised patients with sepsis. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis using the National Data Center for Medical Service claims data in China from 2017 to 2019. SETTING: A total of 3530 hospitals across China. PATIENTS: A total of 36,187 adult immunocompromised patients with sepsis requiring ventilation. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was hospital mortality. Patients were categorized into NIV initiation or IMV initiation groups based on first ventilation. NIV patients were further divided by time to IMV transition: no transition, immediate (= 1 d), early (2-3 d), delayed (4-7 d), or late (= 8 d). Mortality was compared between groups using weighted Cox models. Over the median 9-day follow-up, mortality was similar for initial NIV versus IMV (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.006; 95% CI, 0.959-1.055). However, among NIV patients, a longer time to IMV transition is associated with stepwise increases in mortality, from immediate transition (HR 1.65) to late transition (HR 2.51), compared with initial IMV. This dose-response relationship persisted across subgroups and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged NIV trial before delayed IMV transition is associated with higher mortality in immunocompromised sepsis patients ultimately intubated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of and risk factors for increased postsepsis healthcare utilization compared with pre-sepsis healthcare utilization. DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Years 2016-2019 MarketScan Commercial and Medicaid Database. PATIENTS: Children (0-18 yr) with sepsis treated in a U.S. hospital. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We measured the frequency of and risk factors for increased healthcare utilization in the 90 days post- vs. presepsis hospitalization. We defined increased healthcare utilization as an increase of at least 3 days in the 90 days post-hospitalization compared with the 90 days pre-hospitalization based on outpatient, emergency department, and inpatient hospitalization. We identified 2801 patients hospitalized for sepsis, of whom 865 (30.9%) had increased healthcare utilization post-sepsis, with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 3 days (1-6 d) total in the 90 days pre-sepsis and 10 days (IQR, 6-21 d) total in the 90 days post-sepsis (p < 0.001). In multivariable models, the odds of increased healthcare use were higher for children with longer lengths of hospitalization (> 30 d adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.35; 95% CI, 2.99-6.32) and children with preexisting complex chronic conditions, specifically renal (aOR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.02-2.12), hematologic/immunologic (aOR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.03-1.74), metabolic (aOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.08-1.79), and malignancy (aOR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.38-2.59). CONCLUSIONS: In this nationally representative cohort of children who survived sepsis hospitalization in the United States, nearly one in three had increased healthcare utilization in the 90 days after discharge. Children with hospitalizations longer than 30 days and complex chronic conditions were more likely to experience increased healthcare utilization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) often requires continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), but limited data exist regarding patient characteristics and outcomes. We aimed to describe these features, including the impact of possible dialytrauma (i.e., vasoactive requirement, negative fluid balance) on outcomes, and contrast them to nonseptic patients in an international cohort of children and young adults receiving CRRT. DESIGN: A secondary analysis of Worldwide Exploration of Renal Replacement Outcomes Collaborative in Kidney Disease (WE-ROCK), an international, multicenter, retrospective study. SETTING: Neonatal, cardiac and PICUs at 34 centers in nine countries from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2021. PATIENTS: Patients 0-25 years old requiring CRRT for AKI and/or fluid overload. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 1016 patients, 446 (44%) had sepsis at CRRT initiation and 650 (64%) experienced Major Adverse Kidney Events at 90 days (MAKE-90) (defined as a composite of death, renal replacement therapy [RRT] dependence, or > 25% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline at 90 d from CRRT initiation). Septic patients were less likely to liberate from CRRT by 28 days (30% vs. 38%; p < 0.001) and had higher rates of MAKE-90 (70% vs. 61%; p = 0.002) and higher mortality (47% vs. 31%; p < 0.001) than nonseptic patients; however, septic survivors were less likely to be RRT dependent at 90 days (10% vs. 18%; p = 0.011). On multivariable regression, pre-CRRT vasoactive requirement, time to negative fluid balance, and median daily fluid balance over the first week of CRRT were not associated with MAKE-90; however, increasing duration of vasoactive requirement was independently associated with increased odds of MAKE-90 (adjusted OR [aOR], 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.28) and mortality (aOR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.1-1.32) for each additional day of support. CONCLUSIONS: Septic children requiring CRRT have different clinical characteristics and outcomes compared with those without sepsis, including higher rates of mortality and MAKE-90. Increasing duration of vasoactive support during the first week of CRRT, a surrogate of potential dialytrauma, appears to be associated with these outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: To study the impact of social determinants of health (SDoH) on pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Retrospective study of children (< 18 yr) supported on ECMO (October 1, 2015 to March 1, 2021) using Pediatric Health Information System (44 U.S. children's hospitals). Patients were divided into five diagnostic categories: neonatal cardiac, pediatric cardiac, neonatal respiratory, pediatric respiratory, and sepsis. SDoH included the Child Opportunity Index (COI; higher indicates social advantage), race, ethnicity, payer, and U.S. region. Children without COI were excluded. Diagnostic category-specific clinical variables related to baseline health and illness severity were collected. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Children supported on ECMO experienced a 33% in-hospital mortality (2863/8710). Overall, children with lower COI, "other" race, Hispanic ethnicity, public insurance and from South or West regions had greater mortality. Associations between SDoH and ECMO outcomes differed between diagnostic cohorts. Bivariate analyses found that only pediatric cardiac patients had an association between COI or race and mortality. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined relationships between SDoH, clinical variables and mortality within diagnostic categories. Pediatric cardiac patients had 5% increased odds of death (95% CI, 1.01-1.09) for every 10-point decrement in COI, while Hispanic ethnicity was associated with higher survival (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.72 [0.57-0.89]). Children with heart disease from the highest COI quintile had less cardiac-surgical complexity and earlier cannulation. Independent associations with mortality were observed in sepsis for Black race (aOR 1.62 [1.06-2.47]) and other payer in pediatric respiratory patients (aOR 1.94 [1.23-3.06]). CONCLUSIONS: SDoH are statistically associated with pediatric ECMO outcomes; however, associations differ between diagnostic categories. Influence of COI was observed only in cardiac patients while payer, race, and ethnicity results varied. Further research should investigate differences between diagnostic cohorts and age groups to understand drivers of inequitable outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: In sepsis treatment, antibiotics are crucial, but overuse risks development of antibiotic resistance. Recent guidelines recommended the use of procalcitonin to guide antibiotic cessation, but solid evidence is insufficient. Recently, concerns were raised that this strategy would increase recurrence. Additionally, optimal protocol or difference from the commonly used C-reactive protein (CRP) are uncertain. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of procalcitonin- or CRP-guided antibiotic cessation strategies with standard of care in sepsis. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Igaku Chuo Zasshi, ClinicalTrials.gov , and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials involving adults with sepsis in intensive care. DATA EXTRACTION: A systematic review with network meta-analyses was performed. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessments, Developments, and Evaluation method was used to assess certainty. DATA SYNTHESIS: Eighteen studies involving 5023 participants were included. Procalcitonin-guided and CRP-guided strategies shortened antibiotic treatment (-1.89 days [95% CI, -2.30 to -1.47], -2.56 days [95% CI, -4.21 to -0.91]) with low- to moderate-certainty evidence. In procalcitonin-guided strategies, this benefit was consistent even in subsets with shorter baseline antimicrobial duration (7-10 d) or in Sepsis-3, and more pronounced in procalcitonin cutoff of "0.5 [mu]g/L and 80% reduction." No benefit was observed when monitoring frequency was less than half of the initial 10 days. Procalcitonin-guided strategies lowered mortality (-27 per 1000 participants [95% CI, -45 to -7]) and this was pronounced in Sepsis-3, but CRP-guided strategies led to no difference in mortality. Recurrence did not increase significantly with either strategy (very low to low certainty). CONCLUSIONS: In sepsis, procalcitonin- or CRP-guided antibiotic discontinuation strategies may be beneficial and safe. In particular, the usefulness of procalcitonin guidance for current Sepsis-3, where antimicrobials are used for more than 7 days, was supported. Well-designed studies are needed focusing on monitoring protocol and recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: International guidelines recommend IV crystalloid as the primary fluid for sepsis resuscitation, with 5% human albumin solution (HAS) as the second line. However, it is unclear which fluid has superior clinical effectiveness. We conducted a trial to assess the feasibility of delivering a randomized controlled trial comparing balanced crystalloid against 5% HAS as sole early resuscitation fluid in patients with sepsis presenting to hospital. DESIGN: Multicenter, open, parallel-group randomized feasibility trial. SETTING: Emergency departments (EDs) in 15 U.K. National Health Service (NHS) hospitals. PATIENTS: Adult patients with sepsis and a National Early Warning Score 2 greater than or equal to five requiring IV fluids withing one hour of randomization. INTERVENTIONS: IV fluid resuscitation with balanced crystalloid or 5% HAS for the first 6 hours following randomization. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment rate and 30-day mortality. We successfully recruited 301 participants over 12 months. Mean (SD) age was 69 years (+/- 16 yr), and 151 (50%) were male. From 1303 participants screened; 502 participants were potentially eligible and 300 randomized to receive trial intervention with greater than 95% of participants receiving the intervention. The median number of participants per site was 19 (range, 1-63). Thirty-day mortality was 17.9% (n = 53). Thirty-one participants died (21.1%) within 30 days in the 5% HAS arm, compared with 22 participants (14.8%) in the crystalloid arm (adjusted odds ratio, 1.50; 95% CIs, 0.84-2.83). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest it is feasible to recruit critically ill patients to a fluid resuscitation trial in U.K. EDs using 5% HAS as a primary resuscitation fluid. There was lower mortality in the balanced crystalloid arm. Given these findings, a definitive trial is likely to be deliverable, but the point estimates suggest such a trial would be unlikely to demonstrate a significant benefit from using 5% HAS as a primary resuscitation fluid in sepsis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of different methods of calculating Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores using electronic health record data on the incidence, outcomes, agreement, and predictive validity of Sepsis-3 criteria. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Five Massachusetts hospitals. PATIENTS: Hospitalized adults, 2015 to 2022. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We defined sepsis as a suspected infection (culture obtained and antibiotic administered) with a concurrent increase in SOFA score by greater than or equal to 2 points (Sepsis-3 criteria). Our reference SOFA implementation strategy imputed normal values for missing data, used Pao2/Fio2 ratios for respiratory scores, and assumed normal baseline SOFA scores for community-onset sepsis. We then implemented SOFA scores using different missing data imputation strategies (averaging worst values from preceding and following days vs. carrying forward nonmissing values), imputing respiratory scores using Spo2/Fio2 ratios, and incorporating comorbidities and prehospital laboratory data into baseline SOFA scores. Among 1,064,459 hospitalizations, 297,512 (27.9%) had suspected infection and 141,052 (13.3%) had sepsis with an in-hospital mortality rate of 10.3% using the reference SOFA method. The percentage of patients missing SOFA components for at least 1 day in the infection window was highest for Pao2/Fio2 ratios (98.6%), followed by Spo2/Fio2 ratios (73.5%), bilirubin (68.5%), and Glasgow Coma Scale scores (57.2%). Different missing data imputation strategies yielded near-perfect agreement in identifying sepsis (kappa 0.99). However, using Spo2/Fio2 imputations yielded higher sepsis incidence (18.3%), lower mortality (8.1%), and slightly lower predictive validity for mortality (area under the receiver operating curves [AUROC] 0.76 vs. 0.78). For community-onset sepsis, incorporating comorbidities and historical laboratory data into baseline SOFA score estimates yielded lower sepsis incidence (6.9% vs. 11.6%), higher mortality (13.4% vs. 9.6%), and higher predictive validity (AUROC 0.79 vs. 0.75) relative to the reference SOFA implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Common variations in calculating respiratory and baseline SOFA scores, but not in handling missing data, lead to substantial differences in observed incidence, mortality, agreement, and predictive validity of Sepsis-3 criteria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: To derive a pooled estimate of the incidence and outcomes of sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI) in ICU patients and to explore the impact of differing definitions of SA-AKI on these estimates. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Medline Epub, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL between 1990 and 2023. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials and prospective cohort studies of adults admitted to the ICU with either sepsis and/or SA-AKI. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted in duplicate. Risk of bias was assessed using adapted standard tools. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by using a single covariate logistic regression model. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants in ICU with sepsis who developed AKI. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 189 studies met inclusion criteria. One hundred fifty-four reported an incidence of SA-AKI, including 150,978 participants. The pooled proportion of patients who developed SA-AKI across all definitions was 0.40 (95% CI, 0.37--0.42) and 0.52 (95% CI, 0.48--0.56) when only the Risk Injury Failure Loss End-Stage, Acute Kidney Injury Network, and Improving Global Outcomes definitions were used to define SA-AKI. There was significant variation in the incidence of SA-AKI depending on the definition of AKI used and whether AKI defined by urine output criteria was included; the incidence was lowest when receipt of renal replacement therapy was used to define AKI (0.26; 95% CI, 0.24--0.28), and highest when the Acute Kidney Injury Network score was used (0.57; 95% CI, 0.45--0.69; p < 0.01). Sixty-seven studies including 29,455 participants reported at least one SA-AKI outcome. At final follow-up, the proportion of patients with SA-AKI who had died was 0.48 (95% CI, 0.43-0.53), and the proportion of surviving patients who remained on dialysis was 0.10 (95% CI, 0.04-0.17). CONCLUSIONS: SA-AKI is common in ICU patients with sepsis and carries a high risk of death and persisting kidney impairment. The incidence and outcomes of SA-AKI vary significantly depending on the definition of AKI used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: In 2018, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention introduced the Adult Sepsis Event (ASE) definition, using electronic health records (EHRs) data for surveillance and sepsis quality improvement. However, data regarding ASE outside the United States remain limited. We therefore aimed to validate the diagnostic accuracy of the ASE and to assess the prevalence and mortality of sepsis using ASE. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A single center in South Korea, with 2732 beds including 221 ICU beds. PATIENTS: During the validation phase, adult patients who were hospitalized or visiting the emergency department between November 5 and November 11, 2019, were included. In the subsequent phase of epidemiologic analysis, we included adult patients who were admitted from January to December 2020. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: ASE had a sensitivity of 91.6%, a specificity of 98.3%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 57.4%, and a negative predictive value of 99.8% when compared with the Sepsis-3 definition. Of 126,998 adult patient hospitalizations in 2020, 6,872 cases were diagnosed with sepsis based on the ASE (5.4% per year), and 893 patients were identified as having sepsis according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition (ICD-10) (0.7% per year). Hospital mortality rates were 16.6% (ASE) and 23.5% (ICD-10-coded sepsis). Monthly sepsis prevalence and hospital mortality exhibited less variation when diagnosed using ASE compared with ICD-10 coding (coefficient of variation [CV] for sepsis prevalence: 0.051 vs. 0.163, Miller test p < 0.001; CV for hospital mortality: 0.087 vs. 0.261, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ASE demonstrated high sensitivity and a moderate PPV compared with the Sepsis-3 criteria in a Korean population. The prevalence of sepsis, as defined by ASE, was 5.4% per year and was similar to U.S. estimates. The prevalence of sepsis by ASE was eight times higher and exhibited less monthly variability compared with that based on the ICD-10 code. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses a study on the association between renin levels and angiotensin II infusion dose in patients with vasopressor-dependent hypotension. The study found that baseline renin levels were predictive biomarkers for response to angiotensin II infusion and that patients with high renin levels required a higher dose of angiotensin II. The study also highlighted the potential cardiac safety of angiotensin II infusion in cardiac surgery patients. However, the study has limitations and further research is needed to confirm the findings. The text emphasizes the importance of personalized physiologic management strategies in traumatic brain injury treatment. [Extracted from the article]

The article examines the role of lipoprotein particles in managing lipids in sepsis and discusses the LIPIDS-P trial, which aimed to increase lipid particles in sepsis patients. However, the trial did not find significant differences in cholesterol levels or clinical outcomes between the treatment and control groups. The article suggests that the dose of lipid emulsion infusion may have been insufficient or that the role of lipids in sepsis may not be as important as previously believed. Additionally, the article discusses a study conducted in Sweden on the impact of different variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus on clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients. The study found that older age, impaired immune system-related disease, greater clinical severity at presentation, and restricted treatment strategy were consistent predictors of death across different variant periods. However, the ICU mortality rate was highest during the Omicron period, contradicting previous findings. The use of steroids during ICU stay and booster vaccination were associated with a reduced risk of mortality. [Extracted from the article]

This article discusses the challenges of accurately measuring the incidence and mortality of sepsis, a global health priority. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed the "Adult Sepsis Event" (ASE) definition in 2018, which uses clinical data from electronic health records (EHR) to identify sepsis. This study in South Korea validates the feasibility and benefits of using the ASE definition to measure sepsis incidence and outcomes outside of the U.S. The study also highlights the limitations of using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for tracking sepsis. The findings suggest that ASE surveillance could facilitate standardized international comparisons of sepsis rates and mortality. The study identifies areas for improvement, such as incorporating additional criteria and improving the match between electronic and traditional assessment methods. However, the study's limitations include its focus on a single hospital and a single year during the COVID-19 pandemic. The authors emphasize the importance of conducting sepsis surveillance in low- and middle-income settings and the potential for ASE surveillance to provide reliable global data on sepsis epidemiology. [Extracted from the article]

OBJECTIVES: The relationship between renin levels, exposure to renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, angiotensin II (ANGII) responsiveness, and outcome in patients with vasopressor-dependent vasodilatory hypotension is unknown. DESIGN: We conducted a single-center prospective observational study to explore whether recent RAS inhibitor exposure affected baseline renin levels, whether baseline renin levels predicted ANGII responsiveness, and whether renin levels at 24 hours were associated with clinical outcomes. SETTING: An academic ICU in Melbourne, VIC, Australia. PATIENTS: Forty critically ill adults who received ANGII as the primary agent for vasopressor-dependent vasodilatory hypotension who were included in the Acute Renal effects of Angiotensin II Management in Shock study. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After multivariable adjustment, recent exposure to a RAS inhibitor was independently associated with a relative increase in baseline renin levels by 198% (95% CI, 36-552%). The peak amount of ANGII required to achieve target mean arterial pressure was independently associated with baseline renin level (increase by 46% per ten-fold increase; 95% CI, 8--98%). Higher renin levels at 24 hours after ANGII initiation were independently associated with fewer days alive and free of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) (-7 d per ten-fold increase; 95% CI, -12 to -1). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with vasopressor-dependent vasodilatory hypotension, recent RAS inhibitor exposure was associated with higher baseline renin levels. Such higher renin levels were then associated with decreased ANGII responsiveness. Higher renin levels at 24 hours despite ANGII infusion were associated with fewer days alive and CRRT-free. These preliminary findings emphasize the importance of the RAS and the role of renin as a biomarker in patients with vasopressor-dependent vasodilatory hypotension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: Low cholesterol levels in early sepsis patients are associated with mortality. We sought to test if IV lipid emulsion administration to sepsis patients with low cholesterol levels would prevent a decline or increase total cholesterol levels at 48 hours. DESIGN: Phase II, adaptive, randomized pilot clinical trial powered for 48 patients. SETTING: Emergency department or ICU of an academic medical center. PATIENTS: Sepsis patients (first 24 hr) with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment greater than or equal to 4 or shock. INTERVENTIONS: Patients meeting study criteria, including screening total cholesterol levels less than or equal to 100 mg/dL or high-density lipoprotein cho- lesterol (HDL-C) + low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) less than or equal to 70 mg/dL, were randomized to receive one of three doses of lipid emulsion administered twice in 48 hours or no drug (controls). The primary endpoint was a change in serum total cholesterol (48 hr -- enrollment) between groups. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were enrolled and randomized. Two patients randomized to lipid emulsion were withdrawn before drug administration. Data for 24 control patients and 23 lipid emulsion patients were analyzed. The mean change in total cholesterol from enrollment to 48 hours was not different between groups and was 5 mg/dL (sd 20) for lipid emulsion patients, and 2 mg/dL (sd 18) for control patients (p = 0.62). The mean changes in HDL-C and LDL-C were similar between groups. Mean change in triglycerides was elevated in lipid emulsion patients (61 mg/dL, sd 87) compared with controls (20 mg/dL, sd 70, p = 0.086). The 48-hour change in SOFA score was -2 (interquartile range [IQR] -4, -1) for control patients and -2 (IQR -3, 0) for lipid emulsion patients (p = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of IV lipid emulsion to early sepsis patients with low cholesterol levels did not influence change in cholesterol levels from enrollment to 48 hours. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the revised recommendations of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign's Antibiotic Timing Guidance. The new guidelines suggest customizing antibiotic management based on the probability of bacterial infection and severity of illness, rather than treating all patients within 1 hour of recognition. A recent study supports these recommendations, showing that patients with possible infection but no shock can safely tolerate longer intervals until antibiotics. However, the study has limitations, and further research is needed to confirm the safety and impact of the revised guidelines. The article emphasizes the challenges of calculating infection probabilities in real-time and the need for clinicians to exercise judgment when determining treatment courses for patients with possible sepsis. It suggests that the current guidance may need further refinement, including extending the time window for investigation for patients with possible infection but no shock and shortening the time window to treat selected high-risk patients without shock. Further research is also needed to test and refine antibiotic guidance for patients with possible but unconfirmed serious infections. [Extracted from the article]

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate real-world implications of updated Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) recommendations for antibiotic timing. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Twelve hospitals in the Southeastern United States between 2017 and 2021. PATIENTS: One hundred sixty-six thousand five hundred fifty-nine adult hospitalized patients treated in the emergency department for suspected serious infection. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We determined the number and characteristics of patients affected by updated SSC recommendations for initiation of antibiotics that incorporate a risk- and probability-stratified approach. Using an infection prediction model with a cutoff of 0.5 to classify possible vs. probable infection, we found that 30% of the suspected infection cohort would be classified as shock absent, possible infection and thus eligible for the new 3-hour antibiotic recommendation. In real-world practice, this group had a conservative time to antibiotics (median, 5.5 hr; interquartile range [IQR], 3.2-9.8 hr) and low mortality (2%). Patients categorized as shock absent, probable infection had a median time to antibiotics of 3.2 hours (IQR, 2.1-5.1 hr) and mortality of 3%. Patients categorized as shock present, the probable infection had a median time to antibiotics 2.7 hours (IQR, 1.7-4.6 hr) and mortality of 17%, and patients categorized as shock present, the possible infection had a median time to antibiotics 6.9 hours (IQR, 3.5-16.3 hr) and mortality of 12%. CONCLUSIONS: These data support recently updated SSC recommendations to align antibiotic timing targets with risk and probability stratifications. Our results provide empirical support that clinicians and hospitals should not be held to 1-hour targets for patients without shock and with only possible sepsis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the challenges in diagnosing sepsis and the need for biomarkers that can be used in the emergency department (ED) to rapidly identify high-risk patients. A study conducted in German tertiary hospitals tested the performance of various biomarkers, with procalcitonin performing the best in identifying patients with sepsis. However, the accuracy of procalcitonin was still moderate, and other promising biomarkers were not tested in this study. The study suggests that while procalcitonin testing can be used in selected patients with suspected sepsis, it should not override clinical judgment. The study provides preliminary data for future trials examining the impact of biomarkers on clinical management and patient outcomes. [Extracted from the article]

OBJECTIVES: Consensus regarding biomarkers for detection of infectionrelated organ dysfunction in the emergency department is lacking. We aimed to identify and validate biomarkers that could improve risk prediction for overt or incipient organ dysfunction when added to quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) as a screening tool. DESIGN: In a large prospective multicenter cohort of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with a qSOFA score greater than or equal to 1, admission plasma levels of C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, adrenomedullin (either bioavailable adrenomedullin or midregional fragment of proadrenomedullin), proenkephalin, and dipeptidyl peptidase 3 were assessed. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was applied to assess the impact of these biomarkers alone or in combination to detect the primary endpoint of prediction of sepsis within 96 hours of admission. SETTING: Three tertiary emergency departments at German University Hospitals (Jena University Hospital and two sites of the Charité University Hospital, Berlin). PATIENTS: One thousand four hundred seventy-seven adult patients presenting with suspected organ dysfunction based on qSOFA score greater than or equal to 1. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The cohort was of moderate severity with 81% presenting with qSOFA = 1; 29.2% of these patients developed sepsis. Procalcitonin outperformed all other biomarkers regarding the primary endpoint (area under the curve for receiver operating characteristic [AUC-ROC], 0.86 [0.79-0.93]). Adding other biomarkers failed to further improve the AUCROC for the primary endpoint; however, they improved the model regarding several secondary endpoints, such as mortality, need for vasopressors, or dialysis. Addition of procalcitonin with a cutoff level of 0.25 ng/mL improved net (re)classification by 35.2% compared with qSOFA alone, with positive and negative predictive values of 60.7% and 88.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Biomarkers of infection and organ dysfunction, most notably procalcitonin, substantially improve early prediction of sepsis with added value to qSOFA alone as a simple screening tool on emergency department admission. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article "The Geographic Puzzle of Sepsis Recovery: Patterns in U.S. Rural and Urban Sepsis Survivors" explores the disparities in sepsis recovery between rural and urban areas in the United States. It discusses the economic burden of sepsis, hospital readmissions, and the impact of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage on patient outcomes. The research highlights the need for targeted interventions to improve sepsis outcomes in both rural and urban settings. [Extracted from the article]

The article discusses the long-term medical needs of children after recovering from sepsis, highlighting the significant morbidity and healthcare utilization that persists even after initial treatment. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the interaction between sepsis and chronic illnesses in children, as well as the impact of sepsis on their overall health trajectory. The study by Carlton et al. examines the increased healthcare utilization in children following sepsis hospitalization, particularly in those with chronic diseases, technology dependence, and higher pre-sepsis healthcare utilization. The findings underscore the ongoing challenges and burdens faced by children and their families post-sepsis, indicating the need for further research and support in this area. [Extracted from the article]

The article discusses the ongoing debate between using colloid or crystalloid solutions for resuscitation in sepsis patients. Colloids, such as albumin, have been used for their ability to improve oncotic pressure and treat hypoalbuminemia. However, recent randomized control trials have shown that albumin does not improve survival in critically ill septic patients, although it also does not cause harm. The optimal approach to fluid management in septic patients remains uncertain, and the most recent guidelines recommend initial resuscitation with crystalloids. A recent feasibility study comparing albumin and balanced crystalloid in early sepsis found no difference in mortality, but further research is needed to determine the best fluid choices in early sepsis. [Extracted from the article]

RATIONALE: New evidence is available examining the use of corticosteroids in sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), warranting a focused update of the 2017 guideline on critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency. OBJECTIVES: To develop evidence-based recommendations for use of corticosteroids in hospitalized adults and children with sepsis, ARDS, and CAP. PANEL DESIGN: The 22-member panel included diverse representation from medicine, including adult and pediatric intensivists, pulmonologists, endocrinologists, nurses, pharmacists, and clinician-methodologists with expertise in developing evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines. We followed Society of Critical Care Medicine conflict of interest policies in all phases of the guideline development, including task force selection and voting. METHODS: After development of five focused Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes (PICO) questions, we conducted systematic reviews to identify the best available evidence addressing each question. We evaluated the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach and formulated recommendations using the evidence-to-decision framework. RESULTS: In response to the five PICOs, the panel issued four recommendations addressing the use of corticosteroids in patients with sepsis, ARDS, and CAP. These included a conditional recommendation to administer corticosteroids for patients with septic shock and critically ill patients with ARDS and a strong recommendation for use in hospitalized patients with severe CAP. The panel also recommended against high dose/short duration administration of corticosteroids for septic shock. In response to the final PICO regarding type of corticosteroid molecule in ARDS, the panel was unable to provide specific recommendations addressing corticosteroid molecule, dose, and duration of therapy, based on currently available evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The panel provided updated recommendations based on current evidence to inform clinicians, patients, and other stakeholders on the use of corticosteroids for sepsis, ARDS, and CAP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the development of albumin administration in patients admitted to the adult ICU. In addition, we assessed the impact of albumin administration on serum hemoglobin concentration. DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective single-center study including all patients who were admitted to the ICU from January 2013 to December 2021 and stayed at least 24 hours. SETTING: The study was conducted in an academic hospital (University Hospital Basel, Switzerland). PATIENTS: A total of 20,927 admissions were included, of which 3748 received albumin at least once during their ICU stay. To analyze volume expansion, 2006 admissions met the inclusion criteria, namely at least two hemoglobin measurements within 12 hours, one albumin delivery, and experienced no bleeding, dialysis, or transfusions during this period. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: We examined the hemoglobin levels before and after albumin administration and compared them with a matched control group to assess the amount and duration of volume expansion. MAIN RESULTS: From 2013 to 2021 the proportion of critically ill patients treated with albumin rose from 5.0% to 32.5%. An overproportioned increase in albumin use could be seen in surgical patients (4.7–47.2%) and in those receiving RBC transfusion (13.7–72.6%). In those patients receiving albumin, a significant drop in hemoglobin of around 5 g/L on average could be observed following treatment with albumin. CONCLUSION: Hemodilution was observable for at least 12 hours after albumin administration and may have caused a decrease in hemoglobin concentration of greater than 8 g/L when isooncotic albumin solution (5%, 25 g in 500 mL) was administered. This makes albumin, especially in its isooncotic form, an ideal colloid to achieve long-lasting volume expansion. However, RBC transfusions may increase under albumin therapy, as transfusion thresholds may be undershot after albumin administration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This document is an executive summary of guidelines on the use of corticosteroids in critically ill patients with sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The guidelines were developed by a task force of international experts in critical care medicine and endocrinology. The summary provides updated recommendations based on new evidence and focuses on the most common diagnoses in which corticosteroids are considered. The recommendations are categorized by condition and include the strength of the recommendation and the quality of evidence. The summary also mentions that the guidelines are applicable to adult and pediatric patients, but specific recommendations for pediatric patients are limited due to a lack of available studies. [Extracted from the article]

OBJECTIVES: To use the ventricular pressure–volume relationship and time-varying elastance model to provide a foundation for understanding cardiovascular physiology and pathophysiology, interpreting advanced hemodynamic monitoring, and for illustrating the physiologic basis and hemodynamic effects of therapeutic interventions. We will build on this foundation by using a cardiovascular simulator to illustrate the application of these principles in the care of patients with severe sepsis, cardiogenic shock, and acute mechanical circulatory support. DATA SOURCES: Publications relevant to the discussion of the time-varying elastance model, cardiogenic shock, and sepsis were retrieved from MEDLINE. Supporting evidence was also retrieved from MEDLINE when indicated. STUDY SELECTION, DATA EXTRACTION, AND SYNTHESIS: Data from relevant publications were reviewed and applied as indicated. CONCLUSIONS: The ventricular pressure–volume relationship and time-varying elastance model provide a foundation for understanding cardiovascular physiology and pathophysiology. We have built on this foundation by using a cardiovascular simulator to illustrate the application of these important principles and have demonstrated how complex pathophysiologic abnormalities alter clinical parameters used by the clinician at the bedside. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that the immunosuppressive effects associated with antibiotics, sedatives, and catecholamines amplify sepsis-associated immune suppression through mitochondrial dysfunction, and there is a cumulative effect when used in combination. We thus sought to determine the impact of the exemplar drugs ciprofloxacin, propofol, and norepinephrine, used alone and in combination, at clinically relevant concentrations, on the ex vivo functionality of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) drawn from healthy, infected, and septic individuals. DESIGN: In vitro/ex vivo investigation. SETTING: University laboratory. SUBJECTS: Healthy volunteers, infected (nonseptic) patients in the emergency department, and septic ICU patients. INTERVENTIONS: PBMCs were isolated from these subjects and treated with ciprofloxacin (100 µg/mL), propofol (50 µg/mL), norepinephrine (10 µg/mL), or all three drugs combined, with and without lipopolysaccharide (100 ng/mL) for 6 or 24 hours. Comparison was made between study groups and against untreated cells. Measurements were made of cell viability, cytokine production, phagocytosis, human leukocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR) status, mitochondrial membrane potential, mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production, and oxygen consumption. Gene expression in immune and metabolic pathways was investigated in PBMCs sampled from healthy volunteers coincubated with septic serum. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Coincubation with each of the drugs reduced cytokine production and phagocytosis in PBMCs isolated from septic patients, and healthy volunteers coincubated with septic serum. No effect was seen on HLA-DR surface expression. No cumulative effects were seen with the drug combination. Sepsis-induced changes in gene expression and mitochondrial functionality were not further affected by addition of any of the drugs. CONCLUSION: Drugs commonly used in critical care lead to significant immune dysfunction ex vivo and enhance sepsis-associated immunosuppression. Further studies are required to identify underlying mechanisms and potential impact on patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: In high-income countries (HICs), sepsis endotypes defined by distinct pathobiological mechanisms, mortality risks, and responses to corticosteroid treatment have been identified using blood transcriptomics. The generalizability of these endotypes to low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), where the global sepsis burden is concentrated, is unknown. We sought to determine the prevalence, prognostic relevance, and immunopathological features of HIC-derived transcriptomic sepsis endotypes in sub-Saharan Africa. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Public referral hospital in Uganda. PATIENTS: Adults (n = 128) hospitalized with suspected sepsis. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Using whole-blood RNA sequencing data, we applied 19-gene and 7-gene classifiers derived and validated in HICs (SepstratifieR) to assign patients to one of three sepsis response signatures (SRS). The 19-gene classifier assigned 30 (23.4%), 92 (71.9%), and 6 (4.7%) patients to SRS-1, SRS-2, and SRS-3, respectively, the latter of which is designed to capture individuals transcriptionally closest to health. SRS-1 was defined biologically by proinflammatory innate immune activation and suppressed natural killer-cell, T-cell, and B-cell immunity, whereas SRS-2 was characterized by dampened innate immune activation, preserved lymphocyte immunity, and suppressed transcriptional responses to corticosteroids. Patients assigned to SRS-1 were predominantly (80.0% [24/30]) persons living with HIV with advanced immunosuppression and frequent tuberculosis. Mortality at 30-days differed significantly by endotype and was highest (48.1%) in SRS-1. Agreement between 19-gene and 7-gene SRS assignments was poor (Cohen's kappa 0.11). Patient stratification was suboptimal using the 7-gene classifier with 15.1% (8/53) of individuals assigned to SRS-3 deceased at 30-days. CONCLUSIONS: Sepsis endotypes derived in HICs share biological and clinical features with those identified in sub-Saharan Africa, with major differences in host--pathogen profiles. Our findings highlight the importance of context-specific sepsis endotyping, the generalizability of conserved biological signatures of critical illness across disparate settings, and opportunities to develop more pathobiologically informed sepsis treatment strategies in LMICs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: Although delirium is well described in patients with sepsis, there are limited data on other neurologic complications. We aimed to systematically review the prevalence, neuromonitoring tools, and neurocognitive outcomes in sepsis patients with neurologic complications. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE and six other databases (Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched through January 2023. STUDY SELECTION: Studies of adult patients with sepsis reported neurologic complications, use of neuromonitoring tools, neuropathology, and cognitive outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers extracted the data. Randomeffect meta-analyses were used to pool data. DATA SYNTHESIS: Seventy-four studies (n = 146,855) were included. Neurologic complications were reported in 38 studies (n = 142,193) including septic encephalopathy (36%, 95% CI, 27-46%; I² = 99%), ischemic stroke (5%, 95% CI, 2.1-11.5; I² = 99%), intracranial hemorrhage (2%, 95% CI, 1.0-4.4%; I² = 96%), seizures (1%, 95% CI, 0.2-7%; I² = 96%), posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (9%), and hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (7%). In the meta-regression analysis, pulmonary infection, sepsis induced by a gram-positive organism, higher sequential organ failure assessment score, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score at admission, and longer ICU length of stay were associated with higher risk of developing septic encephalopathy. Three studies (n = 159) reported postmortem neuropathological findings, acute brain injury was noted in 47% of patients. Twenty-six studies (n = 1,358) reported the use of neuromonitoring tools, electroencephalogram was the most used tool for seizure detection. Transcranial Doppler and near infrared spectroscopy were used for monitoring cerebral hemodynamic changes to detect early ischemia. Six studies reported cognitive outcomes (n = 415) up to 12 months postdischarge and cognitive impairment (≥ one domain) was reported in 30%. CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital neurologic complications are common in patients with sepsis. However, the mechanism and timing of those sepsis-associated complications are poorly understood and there are limited data on standardized neuromonitoring in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article explores the potential use of renin as a biomarker in sepsis. Renin is an enzyme involved in regulating various physiological processes. Some studies have found associations between renin levels and sepsis outcomes, including mortality. However, these studies have limitations such as small sample sizes and lack of external validation. While renin shows promise as a biomarker, further research is needed to confirm its usefulness in clinical care. The article also discusses the potential use of renin levels to guide the administration of angiotensin II in septic shock, but more research is needed to determine reference ranges and thresholds for clinical action. Overall, there is a need for a better understanding of the renin-angiotensin system and the development of biomarkers to inform clinical decision-making. [Extracted from the article]

OBJECTIVE: Sepsis is a leading cause of mortality. Predicting outcomes is challenging and few biomarkers perform well. Defects in the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) can predict clinical outcomes in sepsis and may outperform traditional biomarkers. We postulated that RAS dysfunction (elevated active renin, angiotensin 1-7 [Ang-(1-7)], and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) activity with depressed Ang-II and ACE activity) would be associated with mortality in a cohort of septic patients. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of patients enrolled in the Vitamin C, Thiamine, and Steroids in Sepsis (VICTAS) randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Forty-three hospitals across the United States. PATIENTS: Biorepository samples of 103 patients. INTERVENTIONS: We analyzed day 0 (within 24 hr of respiratory failure, septic shock, or both) and day 3 samples ( n = 103 and 95, respectively) for assessment of the RAS. The association of RAS values with 30-day mortality was determined using Cox proportional hazards regression with multivariable adjustments for age, sex, VICTAS treatment arm, systolic blood pressure, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score, and vasopressor use. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: High baseline active renin values were associated with higher 30-day mortality when dichotomized to the median of 188.7 pg/mL (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.84 [95% CI, 1.10-7.33], p = 0.031) or stratified into quartiles (Q1 = ref, HRQ2 = 2.01 [0.37-11.04], HR Q3 = 3.22 [0.64-16.28], HRQ4 = 5.58 [1.18-26.32], p for linear trend = 0.023). A 1- sd (593.6 pg/mL) increase in renin from day 0 to day 3 was associated with increased mortality (HR = 3.75 [95% CI, 1.94-7.22], p < 0.001), and patients whose renin decreased had improved survival compared with those whose renin increased (HR 0.22 [95% CI, 0.08-0.60], p = 0.003). Ang-(1-7), ACE2 activity, Ang-II and ACE activity did not show this association. Mortality was attenuated in patients with renin over the median on day 0 who received the VICTAS intervention, but not on day 3 ( p interaction 0.020 and 0.137, respectively). There were no additional consistent patterns of mortality on the RAS from the VICTAS intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline serum active renin levels were strongly associated with mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis. Furthermore, a greater relative activation in circulating renin from day 0 to day 3 was associated with a higher risk of death. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: Metabolic syndrome is known to predict outcomes in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) but has never been studied in non- COVID-19 ARDS. We therefore aimed to determine the association of metabolic syndrome with mortality among ARDS trial subjects. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of ARDS trials' data. SETTING: An ancillary analysis was conducted using data from seven ARDS Network and Prevention and Early Treatment of Acute Lung Injury Network randomized trials within the Biologic Specimen and Data Repository Information Coordinating Center database. PATIENTS: Hospitalized patients with ARDS and metabolic syndrome (defined by obesity, diabetes, and hypertension) were compared with similar patients without metabolic syndrome (those with less than three criteria). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Among 4288 ARDS trial participants, 454 (10.6%) with metabolic syndrome were compared with 3834 controls (89.4%). In adjusted analyses, the metabolic syndrome group was associated with lower 28-day and 90-day mortality when compared with control (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.70 [95% CI, 0.55-0.89] and 0.75 [95% CI, 0.60-0.95], respectively). With each additional metabolic criterion from 0 to 3, adjusted 28-day mortality was reduced by 18%, 22%, and 40%, respectively. In subgroup analyses stratifying by ARDS etiology, mortality was lower for metabolic syndrome vs. control in ARDS caused by sepsis or pneumonia (at 28 d, aOR 0.64 [95% CI, 0.48--0.84] and 90 d, aOR 0.69 [95% CI, 0.53-0.89]), but not in ARDS from noninfectious causes (at 28 d, aOR 1.18 [95% CI, 0.70-1.99] and 90 d, aOR 1.26 [95% CI, 0.77-2.06]). Interaction p = 0.04 and p = 0.02 for 28- and 90-day comparisons, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic syndrome in ARDS was associated with a lower risk of mortality in non-COVID-19 ARDS. The relationship between metabolic in- flammation and ARDS may provide a novel biological pathway to be explored in precision medicine-based trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: To identify research priorities in the management, epidemiology, outcome, and pathophysiology of sepsis and septic shock. DESIGN: Shortly after publication of the most recent Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines, the Surviving Sepsis Research Committee, a multiprofessional group of 16 international experts representing the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Society of Critical Care Medicine, convened virtually and iteratively developed the article and recommendations, which represents an update from the 2018 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Research Priorities. METHODS: Each task force member submitted five research questions on any sepsis-related subject. Committee members then independently ranked their top three priorities from the list generated. The highest rated clinical and basic science questions were developed into the current article. RESULTS: A total of 81 questions were submitted. After merging similar questions, there were 34 clinical and ten basic science research questions submitted for voting. The five top clinical priorities were as follows: 1) what is the best strategy for screening and identification of patients with sepsis, and can predictive modeling assist in real-time recognition of sepsis? 2) what causes organ injury and dysfunction in sepsis, how should it be defined, and how can it be detected? 3) how should fluid resuscitation be individualized initially and beyond? 4) what is the best vasopressor approach for treating the different phases of septic shock? and 5) can a personalized/precision medicine approach identify optimal therapies to improve patient outcomes? The five top basic science priorities were as follows: 1) How can we improve animal models so that they more closely resemble sepsis in humans? 2) What outcome variables maximize correlations between human sepsis and animal models and are therefore most appropriate to use in both? 3) How does sepsis affect the brain, and how do sepsis-induced brain alterations contribute to organ dysfunction? How does sepsis affect interactions between neural, endocrine, and immune systems? 4) How does the microbiome affect sepsis pathobiology? 5) How do genetics and epigenetics influence the development of sepsis, the course of sepsis and the response to treatments for sepsis? CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge advances in multiple clinical domains have been incorporated in progressive iterations of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines, allowing for evidence-based recommendations for short- and long-term management of sepsis. However, the strength of existing evidence is modest with significant knowledge gaps and mortality from sepsis remains high. The priorities identified represent a roadmap for research in sepsis and septic shock. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: Echocardiography is commonly used for hemodynamic assessment in sepsis, but data regarding its association with outcome are conflicting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between echocardiography and outcomes in patients with septic shock using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study comparing patients who did or did not undergo transthoracic echocardiography within the first 5 days of admission for the primary outcome of 28-day mortality. SETTING: Admissions to the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center intensive care from 2008 to 2019. PATIENTS: Adults 16 years old or older with septic shock requiring vasopressor support within 48 hours of admission. Readmissions and patients admitted to the coronary care unit or cardiovascular intensive care were excluded, as well as patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction or cardiac arrest. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Echocardiography was performed in 1,515 (27%) of 5,697 eligible admissions. The primary outcome was analyzed using a marginal structural model and rolling entry matching to adjust for baseline and time-varying confounders. Patients who underwent echocardiography showed no significant difference in 28-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.09; 95% CI, 0.95-1.25; p = 0.24). This was consistent across multiple sensitivity analyses. Secondary outcomes were changes in management instituted within 4 hours of imaging. Treatment changes occurred in 493 patients (33%) compared with 431 matched controls (29%), with the most common intervention being the administration of a fluid bolus. CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiography in sepsis was not associated with a reduction in 28-day mortality based on observational data. These findings do not negate the utility of echo in cases of diagnostic uncertainty or inadequate response to initial treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: To determine if a real-time monitoring system with automated clinician alerts improves 3-hour sepsis bundle adherence. DESIGN: Prospective, pragmatic clinical trial. Allocation alternated every 7 days. SETTING: Quaternary hospital from December 1, 2020 to November 30, 2021. PATIENTS: Adult emergency department or inpatients meeting objective sepsis criteria triggered an electronic medical record (EMR)-embedded best practice advisory. Enrollment occurred when clinicians acknowledged the advisory indicating they felt sepsis was likely. INTERVENTION: Real-time automated EMR monitoring identified suspected sepsis patients with incomplete bundle measures within 1-hour of completion deadlines and generated reminder pages. Clinicians responsible for intervention group patients received reminder pages; no pages were sent for controls. The primary analysis cohort was the subset of enrolled patients at risk of bundle non-adherent care that had reminder pages generated. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was orders for all 3-hour bundle elements within guideline time limits. Secondary outcomes included guideline-adherent delivery of all 3-hour bundle elements, 28-day mortality, antibiotic discontinuation within 48-hours, and pathogen recovery from any culture within 7 days of time-zero. Among 3,269 enrolled patients, 1,377 had reminder pages generated and were included in the primary analysis. There were 670 (48.7%) at-risk patients randomized to paging alerts and 707 (51.3%) to control. Bundle-adherent orders were placed for 198 intervention patients (29.6%) versus 149 (21.1%) controls (difference: 8.5%; 95% CI, 3.9-13.1%; p = 0.0003). Bundle-adherent care was delivered for 152 (22.7%) intervention versus 121 (17.1%) control patients (difference: 5.6%; 95% CI, 1.4-9.8%; p = 0.0095). Mortality was similar between groups (8.4% vs 8.3%), as were early antibiotic discontinuation (35.1% vs 33.4%) and pan-culture negativity (69.0% vs 68.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Real-time monitoring and paging alerts significantly increased orders for and delivery of guideline-adherent care for suspected sepsis patients at risk of 3-hour bundle nonadherence. The trial was underpowered to determine whether adherence affected mortality. Despite enrolling patients with clinically suspected sepsis, early antibiotic discontinuation and pan-culture negativity were common, highlighting challenges in identifying appropriate patients for sepsis bundle application. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: To identify cytokine signature clusters in patients with septic shock. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Single academic center in the United States. PATIENTS: Adult (≥ 18 yr old) patients admitted to the medical ICU with septic shock requiring vasoactive medication support. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One hundred fourteen patients with septic shock completed cytokine measurement at time of enrollment (t1) and 24 hours later (t2). Unsupervised random forest analysis of the change in cytokines over time, defined as delta (t2–t1), identified three clusters with distinct cytokine profiles. Patients in cluster 1 had the lowest initial levels of circulating cytokines that decreased over time. Patients in cluster 2 and cluster 3 had higher initial levels that decreased over time in cluster 2 and increased in cluster 3. Patients in clusters 2 and 3 had higher mortality compared with cluster 1 (clusters 1–3: 11% vs 31%; odds ratio [OR], 3.56 [1.10–14.23] vs 54% OR, 9.23 [2.89–37.22]). Cluster 3 was independently associated with in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio, 5.24; p = 0.005) in multivariable analysis. There were no significant differences in initial clinical severity scoring or steroid use between the clusters. Analysis of either t1 or t2 cytokine measurements alone or in combination did not reveal clusters with clear clinical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal measurement of cytokine profiles at initiation of vasoactive medications and 24 hours later revealed three distinct cytokine signature clusters that correlated with clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: Sepsis-associated immune suppression correlates with poor outcomes. Adult trials are evaluating immune support therapies. Limited data exist to support consideration of immunomodulation in pediatric sepsis. We tested the hypothesis that early, persistent lymphopenia predicts worse outcomes in pediatric severe sepsis. DESIGN: Observational cohort comparing children with severe sepsis and early, persistent lymphopenia (absolute lymphocyte count < 1,000 cells/µL on 2 d between study days 0–5) to children without. The composite outcome was prolonged multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS, organ dysfunction beyond day 7) or PICU mortality. SETTING: Nine PICUs in the National Institutes of Health Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network between 2015 and 2017. PATIENTS: Children with severe sepsis and indwelling arterial and/or central venous catheters. INTERVENTIONS: Blood sampling and clinical data analysis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 401 pediatric patients with severe sepsis, 152 (38%) had persistent lymphopenia. These patients were older, had higher illness severity, and were more likely to have underlying comorbidities including solid organ transplant or malignancy. Persistent lymphopenia was associated with the composite outcome prolonged MODS or PICU mortality (66/152, 43% vs 45/249, 18%; p < 0.01) and its components prolonged MODS (59/152 [39%] vs 43/249 [17%]), and PICU mortality (32/152, 21% vs 12/249, 5%; p < 0.01) versus children without. After adjusting for baseline factors at enrollment, the presence of persistent lymphopenia was associated with an odds ratio of 2.98 (95% CI [1.85–4.02]; p < 0.01) for the composite outcome. Lymphocyte count trajectories showed that patients with persistent lymphopenia generally did not recover lymphocyte counts during the study, had lower nadir whole blood tumor necrosis factor-α response to lipopolysaccharide stimulation, and higher maximal inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein and ferritin) during days 0–3 (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Children with severe sepsis and persistent lymphopenia are at risk of prolonged MODS or PICU mortality. This evidence supports testing therapies for pediatric severe sepsis patients risk-stratified by early, persistent lymphopenia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive and updated systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA) to assess the outcome benefits of various blood purification modalities for adult patients with severe infection or sepsis. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a search of PubMed, MEDLINE, clinical trial registries, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases with no language restrictions. STUDY SELECTION: Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected. DATA EXTRACTION: The primary outcome was overall mortality. The secondary outcomes were the length of mechanical ventilation (MV) days and ICU stay, incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), and kidney replacement therapy requirement. DATA SYNTHESIS: We included a total of 60 RCTs with 4,595 participants, comparing 16 blood purification modalities with 17 interventions. Polymyxin-B hemoperfusion (relative risk [RR]: 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57–0.86) and plasma exchange (RR: 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42–0.91) were associated with low mortality (very low and low certainty of evidence, respectively). Because of the presence of high clinical heterogeneity and intransitivity, the potential benefit of polymyxin-B hemoperfusion remained inconclusive. The analysis of secondary outcomes was limited by the scarcity of available studies. HA330 with high-volume continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), HA330, and standard-volume CVVH were associated with shorter ICU stay. HA330 with high-volume CVVH, HA330, and standard-volume CVVH were beneficial in reducing MV days. None of the interventions showed a significant reduction in the incidence of AKI or the need for kidney replacement therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our NMA suggests that plasma exchange and polymyxin-B hemoperfusion may provide potential benefits for adult patients with severe infection or sepsis/septic shock when compared with standard care alone, but most comparisons were based on low or very low certainty evidence. The therapeutic effect of polymyxin-B hemoperfusion remains uncertain. Further RCTs are required to identify the specific patient population that may benefit from extracorporeal blood purification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ObjectivesTo evaluate whether a nurse navigator-led, multicomponent Sepsis Transition And Recovery program improves 30-day mortality and readmission outcomes after sepsis hospitalization.Design: Multisite pragmatic randomized clinical trial.SettingThree hospitals in North Carolina from January 2019 to March 2020.PatientsEligible patients hospitalized for suspected sepsis and deemed high-risk for mortality or readmission by validated internal risk models.InterventionsPatients were randomized to receive usual care alone (i.e., routine transition support, outpatient care; n = 342) or additional Sepsis Transition And Recovery support (n = 349). The 30-day intervention involved a multicomponent transition service led by a nurse navigator through telephone and electronic health record communication to facilitate best practice postsepsis care strategies during and after hospitalization including: postdischarge medication review, evaluation for new impairments or symptoms, monitoring comorbidities, and palliative care approach when appropriate. Clinical oversight was provided by a Hospital Medicine Transition Services team.Measurements and main resultsThe primary outcome was a composite of mortality or hospital readmission at 30 days. Logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate marginal and conditional odds ratios (adjusted for prognostic covariates: age, comorbidity, and organ dysfunction at enrollment). Among 691 randomized patients (mean age = 63.7 ± 15.1 yr; 52% female), a lower percentage of patients in the Sepsis Transition And Recovery group experienced the primary outcome compared with the usual care group (28.7% vs 33.3%; risk difference, 4.7%; odds ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.58-1.11; adjusted odds ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64-0.98). There were 74 deaths (Sepsis Transition And Recovery: 33 [9.5%] vs usual care: 41 [12.0%]) and 155 rehospitalizations (Sepsis Transition And Recovery: 71 [20.3%] vs usual care: 84 [24.6%]).ConclusionsIn a multisite randomized clinical trial of patients hospitalized with sepsis, patients provided with a 30-day program using a nurse navigator to provide best practices for postsepsis care experienced a lower proportion of either mortality or rehospitalization within 30 days after discharge. Further research is needed to understand the contextual factors associated with successful implementation.

The article "Translating Animal Studies to Human Disease: Language Matters" discusses the challenges of presenting animal studies in a way that is understandable and clinically relevant to readers in the field of critical care medicine. The article highlights a study that examined the effects of exercise on mice with pneumonia and found that exercise improved outcomes and reduced the severity of the disease. However, the article also cautions against overgeneralizing these findings to human patients and emphasizes the need for further research and clarification. The article concludes by discussing the importance of considering the broader context of immune responses and organ dysfunction in understanding disease processes. [Extracted from the article]

This article presents a study conducted in Uganda on sepsis endotyping, which involves categorizing patients with sepsis based on their biological characteristics. The study found that a 19-gene classifier was more effective than a 7-gene classifier in this population. Patients assigned to the more severe sepsis endotype had higher mortality rates and were more likely to have HIV and tuberculosis. The article emphasizes the importance of conducting sepsis research in low-income countries to ensure equitable healthcare. However, the study has some limitations and highlights the need for collaboration among research groups to improve sepsis understanding and treatment. [Extracted from the article]

OBJECTIVES: Regionalized sepsis care could improve sepsis outcomes by facilitating the interhospital transfer of patients to higher-capability hospitals. There are no measures of sepsis capability to guide the identification of such hospitals, although hospital case volume of sepsis has been used as a proxy. We evaluated the performance of a novel hospital sepsis-related capability (SRC) index as compared with sepsis case volume. DESIGN: Principal component analysis (PCA) and retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A total of 182 New York (derivation) and 274 Florida and Massachusetts (validation) nonfederal hospitals, 2018. PATIENTS: A total of 89,069 and 139,977 adult patients (≥ 18 yr) with sepsis were directly admitted into the derivation and validation cohort hospitals, respectively. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We derived SRC scores by PCA of six hospital resource use characteristics (bed capacity, annual volumes of sepsis, major diagnostic procedures, renal replacement therapy, mechanical ventilation, and major therapeutic procedures) and classified hospitals into capability score tertiles: high, intermediate, and low. High-capability hospitals were mostly urban teaching hospitals. Compared with sepsis volume, the SRC score explained more variation in hospital-level sepsis mortality in the derivation (unadjusted coefficient of determination [R²]: 0.25 vs 0.12, p < 0.001 for both) and validation (0.18 vs 0.05, p < 0.001 for both) cohorts; and demonstrated stronger correlation with outward transfer rates for sepsis in the derivation (Spearman coefficient [r]: 0.60 vs 0.50) and validation (0.51 vs 0.45) cohorts. Compared with low-capability hospitals, patients with sepsis directly admitted into high-capability hospitals had a greater number of acute organ dysfunctions, a higher proportion of surgical hospitalizations, and higher adjusted mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.55; 95% CI, 1.25-1.92). In stratified analysis, worse mortality associated with higher hospital capability was only evident among patients with three or more organ dysfunctions (OR, 1.88 [1.50-2.34]). CONCLUSIONS: The SRC score has face validity for capability-based groupings of hospitals. Sepsis care may already be de facto regionalized at high-capability hospitals. Low-capability hospitals may have become more adept at treating less complicated sepsis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: Serum procalcitonin is often ordered at admission for patients with suspected sepsis and bloodstream infections (BSIs), although its performance characteristics in this setting remain contested. This study aimed to evaluate use patterns and performance characteristics of procalcitonin-on-admission in patients with suspected BSI, with or without sepsis. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Cerner HealthFacts Database (2008-2017). PATIENTS: Adult inpatients (≥ 18 yr) who had blood cultures and procalcitonin drawn within 24 hours of admission. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Testing frequency of procalcitonin was determined. Sensitivity of procalcitonin-on-admission for detecting BSI due to different pathogens was calculated. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated to assess discrimination by procalcitonin-onadmission for BSI in patients with and without fever/hypothermia, ICU admission and sepsis defined by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Adult Sepsis Event criteria. AUCs were compared using Wald test and p values were adjusted for multiple comparisons. At 65 procalcitonin-reporting hospitals, 74,958 of 739,130 patients (10.1%) who had admission blood cultures also had admission procalcitonin testing. Most patients (83%) who had admission day procalcitonin testing did not have a repeat procalcitonin test. Median procalcitonin varied considerably by pathogen, BSI source, and acute illness severity. At a greater than or equal to 0.5 ng/mL cutoff, sensitivity for BSI detection was 68.2% overall, ranging between 58.0% for enterococcal BSI without sepsis and 96.4% for pneumococcal sepsis. Procalcitonin-on-admission displayed moderate discrimination at best for overall BSI (AUC, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.72-0.73) and showed no additional utility in key subgroups. Empiric antibiotic use proportions were not different between blood culture sampled patients with a positive procalcitonin (39.7%) and negative procalcitonin (38.4%) at admission. CONCLUSIONS: At 65 study hospitals, procalcitonin-on-admission demonstrated poor sensitivity in ruling out BSI, moderate-to-poor discrimination for both bacteremic sepsis and occult BSI and did not appear to meaningfully alter empiric antibiotic usage. Diagnostic stewardship of procalcitonin-on-admission and risk assessment of admission procalcitonin-guided clinical decisions is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To determine the differences between the quality of life for sepsis and nonsepsis survivors, factors affecting the quality of life for sepsis survivors, and their changes over time. DESIGN: A prospective longitudinal study with a quantitative comparative design. SETTING: A university hospital in the greater Tokyo area of Japan. PATIENTS: The study included 41 and 40 patients in the sepsis and nonsepsis groups, respectively. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL), independence in activities of daily living (ADL), stress levels, and spirituality were compared between the sepsis and nonsepsis groups at ICU discharge, hospital discharge, and 1 month after discharge. Comparison of HRQOL between the sepsis and nonsepsis groups showed significantly low HRQOL in the sepsis group compared with the nonsepsis group at ICU discharge and hospital discharge. Factors such as stress levels and spirituality affected the HRQOL in the nonsepsis group at ICU discharge. At discharge, stress and spirituality affected HRQOL in both the sepsis and nonsepsis groups. One month after discharge, ADL, stress, and spirituality affected HRQOL in both the sepsis and nonsepsis groups. In terms of changes over time, HRQOL at ICU discharge in the sepsis group was significantly lower than at discharge and 1 month after discharge. The two-way analyses of variance showed no interactions between the groups and time regarding HRQOL. CONCLUSIONS: HRQOL of sepsis survivors was significantly lower than that of nonsepsis survivors. ADL and stress influenced HRQOL. The study suggests the importance of ADL training and stress alleviation during the ICU stay. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: As causative pathogens are not usually identified at the time of initiating antibiotics in sepsis, carbapenems are commonly used as an initial treatment. To reduce indiscriminate use of carbapenems, the efficacy of alternative empiric regimens, such as piperacillin-tazobactam and the fourth-generation cephalosporins, should be elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate survival effect associated with carbapenems as initial therapy for sepsis compared with these antibiotics. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective observational study. SETTING: Tertiary hospitals in Japan. PATIENTS: Adult patients diagnosed as having sepsis from 2006 to 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Administration of carbapenems as initial antibiotic therapy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: This study used data of adult patients with sepsis extracted from a large-scale database in Japan. Patients were divided into two groups as follows: patients receiving carbapenems and patients receiving noncarbapenem broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics as initial treatment. In-hospital mortality was compared between the groups by a logistic regression model adjusted by an inverse probability treatment weighting using propensity scores. To evaluate heterogeneity of effects according to patient characteristics, we also fitted logistic models in several subgroups. Among 7,392 patients with sepsis, 3,547 patients received carbapenems, and 3,845 patients received noncarbapenem agents. The logistic model showed no significant association between carbapenem therapy and lower mortality (adjusted OR 0.88, p = 0.108). Subgroup analyses suggested that there were significant survival benefits associated with carbapenem therapy in patients with septic shock, in ICUs, or with mechanical ventilation (p for effect modifications: < 0.001, 0.014, and 0.105, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the noncarbapenem broad-spectrum antibiotics, carbapenems as an initial therapy for sepsis were not associated with significantly lower mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: To describe frequency of positive blood cultures, patterns of pathogens' characteristics and their resistance profile in patients with blood cultures drawn due to a presumed diagnosis of community-onset sepsis, and to examine the association between blood culture-positive pathogens and hospital mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Two hundred one U.S. hospitals from 2016 to 2020 using the Premier Healthcare Database. SUBJECTS: Adult patients presenting with community-onset sepsis who had blood cultures collected within 2 days of hospital admission. We defined sepsis using the U.S. Centers for Disease Control Adult Sepsis Event Surveillance criteria. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We identified 147,061 patients with community-onset sepsis. The number of blood culture-positive sepsis episodes was 21,167 (14%) and the number of nonblood culture-positive sepsis episodes was 20,326 (14%). Among patients with blood culture-positive sepsis, Gram-negative rods were isolated in 55% of patients, Gram-positive cocci were isolated in 47%. Of those, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was 11%, ceftri-axone-resistant Enterobacterales/extended-spectrum ^-lactamase was 7%, and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales was 1.3%. The crude in-hospital mortality was 17% for culture-negative sepsis, 13% for nonblood culture-positive sepsis, and 17% for blood culture-positive sepsis. In multilevel logistic regression models, compared with culture-negative sepsis, blood culture-positive sepsis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.85-0.94) and nonblood culture-positive sepsis (aOR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.78-0.87) were associated with lower odds of in-hospital mortality. Acinetobacter species, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, methicillin-sensi-tive Staphylococcus aureus, and MRSA were associated with higher in-hospi-tal mortality, whereas Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species, Proteus species, and Streptococcus species were associated with lower in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In patients hospitalized with community-onset sepsis, the prevalence of blood culture-positive sepsis was 14%. Among positive blood culture sepsis resistant organisms were infrequent. Compared with culture-negative sepsis, blood culture-positive sepsis and nonblood culture-positive sepsis were associated with lower in-hospital mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between levels of intensive care and in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalized for sepsis, stratified by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at admission. DESIGN: A nationwide, propensity score-matched, retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A Japanese national inpatient database with data on 70-75% of all ICU and high-dependency care unit (HDU) beds in Japan. PATIENTS: Adult patients hospitalized for sepsis with SOFA scores greater than or equal to 2 on their day of admission between April 1, 2018, and March 31, 2021, were recruited. Propensity score matching was performed to compare inhospital mortality, and patients were stratified into 10 groups according to SOFA scores. INTERVENTIONS: Two exposure and control groups according to treatment unit on day of admission: 1) ICU + HDU versus general ward and 2) ICU versus HDU. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 97,070 patients, 19,770 (20.4%), 23,066 (23.8%), and 54,234 (55.9%) were treated in ICU, HDU, and general ward, respectively. After propensity score matching, the ICU + H DU group had significantly lower in-hospital mortality than the general ward group, among cohorts with SOFA scores greater than or equal to 6. There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality among cohorts with SOFA scores 3-5. The ICU + HDU group had significantly higher in-hospital mortality than the general ward among cohorts with SOFA scores of 2. The ICU group had lower in-hospital mortality than the HDU group among cohorts with SOFA scores greater than or equal to 12. There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality among cohorts with SOFA scores 5-11. The ICU group had significantly higher in-hospi-tal mortality than the general ward group among cohorts with SOFA scores less than or equal to 4. CONCLUSIONS: Patients hospitalized for sepsis with SOFA scores greater than or equal to 6 in the ICU or HDU had lower in-hospital mortality than those in the general ward, as did those with SOFA scores greater than or equal to 12 in the ICU versus HDU. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ObjectivesSeptic cardiomyopathy develops frequently in patients with sepsis and likely increases short-term mortality. However, whether septic cardiomyopathy is associated with long-term outcomes after sepsis is unknown. We investigated whether septic patients with septic cardiomyopathy have worse long-term outcomes than septic patients without septic cardiomyopathy.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingAdult ICU.PatientsAdult ICU patients with sepsis.InterventionsNone.Measurements and main resultsLeft ventricular global longitudinal systolic strain was our primary measure of septic cardiomyopathy. We employed a suite of multivariable survival analyses to explore linear and nonlinear associations between left ventricular global longitudinal systolic strain and major adverse cardiovascular events, which included death, stroke, and myocardial infarction. Our primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular event through 24 months after ICU discharge. Among 290 study patients, median left ventricular global longitudinal systolic strain was -16.8% (interquartile range, -20.4% to -12.6%), and 38.3% of patients (n = 111) experienced a major adverse cardiovascular event within 24 months after discharge. On our primary, linear analysis, there was a trend (p = 0.08) toward association between left ventricular global longitudinal systolic strain and major adverse cardiovascular event (odds ratio, 1.03; CI, < 1 to 1.07). On our nonlinear analysis, the association was highly significant (p < 0.001) with both high and low left ventricular global longitudinal systolic strain associated with major adverse cardiovascular event among patients with pre-existing cardiac disease. This association was pronounced among patients who were younger (age < 65 yr) and had Charlson Comorbidity Index greater than 5.ConclusionsAmong patients with sepsis and pre-existing cardiac disease who survived to ICU discharge, left ventricular global longitudinal systolic strain demonstrated a U-shaped association with cardiovascular outcomes through 24 months. The relationship was especially strong among younger patients with more comorbidities. These observations are likely of use to design of future trials.