Search

Critical scholarship has illustrated how COVID-19 public health policies can enact racism, classism, and cis-heteronormativity, perpetuating harms among vulnerable communities. We sought to examine the accounts of gay, bisexual, and queer men (GBQM) in Canada on how normative ideologies played out in COVID-19 directives and what impacts these orders had on their lives. Two rounds of semi-structured interviews with GBQM in Montreal (n = 30), Toronto (n = 33), and Vancouver (n = 30) were conducted between November 2020-February 2021 and June-October 2021 (N = 93). Our reflexive thematic analysis drew on the frameworks of cis-heteronormativity and intersectionality to examine how normative assumptions about kinship, sociality, and privilege in COVID-19 public health directives were understood and experienced by GBQM. Our participants explicated how cis-heteronormativity was pervasive in COVID-19 public health messaging, noting that stay-at-home orders and limits on social gatherings reinforced heterosexual forms of kinship. The privileging of cis-heteronormative sociality had detrimental effects on the sense of belonging and identity formation of many participants due to restricted access to queer spaces during the pandemic. Others indicated that stay-at-home orders failed to account for the heterogeneity of queer people's experiences of homelessness and structural racism. These findings provide valuable insights into how public health efforts to control COVID-19 infections have overlooked the complex forms of kinship among GBQM, the importance of queer spaces and community organizations, and the varying vulnerabilities of diverse lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and queer (LGBTQ+) groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Experts have warned that COVID-19 control measures may amplify health inequities among gay, bisexual, queer, and other men who have sex with men (GBM). For HIV-negative GBM, concerns have been raised as to how COVID-19 will disrupt access to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Our study offers empirical findings on these issues, drawing on in-depth interviews conducted with 25 HIV-negative GBM living in Ontario, Canada during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our thematic analysis draws from the sociology of risk to elucidate how a public health morality – a contested ethical framework determining how to be a 'responsible' sexual citizen during the COVID-19 pandemic – informs GBM's sexual and PrEP decision-making. This public health morality was shaped by several factors, including: self-concern versus risks posed to others; anxiety, economic precarity, and becoming COVID-19 weary; shaming public health non-compliance; and comparisons with HIV and shaming (queer) sex. The participants significantly altered their sexual practices, with some stopping, restarting, and others stockpiling their PrEP. While some men's sexual practices ran counter to public health messaging to avoid 'non-essential' contact with those outside of their households, their risk reduction strategies, including avoiding new sexual partnerships and evaluating people's 'common-sense', mirrored the negotiated safety strategies earlier developed to mitigate HIV risk. Public health advice must account for the nuanced ways in which GBM are mitigating COVID-19 risks and are responding to a complex public health morality, in order to avoid stigmatization and potentially increasing COVID-19 transmission by neglecting practical risk reduction measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]