Search

The objective of this study was to investigate the survival and development of porcine cloned embryos vitrified by Cryotop carrier at the zygote, 2- and 4-cell stages. The quality of resultant blastocysts was evaluated according to their total cell number, apoptotic cell rate, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, glutathione (GSH) content and mRNA expression levels of genes related to embryonic development. The survival rates of zygotes, 2- and 4-cell embryos after vitrification did not differ from those of their fresh counterparts. Vitrification still resulted in significantly decreased blastocyst formation rates of these early-stage embryos. Moreover, the total cells, apoptotic rate, ROS and GSH levels in resultant blastocysts were unaffected by vitrification. The mRNA expression levels of PCNA, CPT1, POU5F1 and DNMT3B in the blastocysts derived from vitrified early-stage embryos were significantly higher than those in the fresh blastocysts, but there was no change in expression of CDX2 and DNMT3A genes. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that the early-stage porcine cloned embryos including zygotes, 2- and 4-cells can be successfully vitrified, with respectable blastocyst yield and quality. • Vitrification had no effect on the viability of porcine cloned embryos at the zygote, 2- and 4-cell stages. • Respectable blastocyst yields were obtained from vitrified early-stage porcine cloned embryos. • The resultant blastocysts exhibited a good quality [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is a clinical demand for efficient cryopreservation of cloned camel embryos with considerable logistic and economic advantage. Vitrification of in vivo derived embryos has been reported in camels, but there is no study on vitrification of cloned embryos. Moreover, whether characteristic differences between cloned and in vivo derived embryos imply different vitrification requirement is unresolved. Here, we compared survival, re-expansion and pregnancy rates of cloned embryos vitrified using two commercial vitrification kits (Cryotec and Kitazato), developed basically for human embryos, and a vitrification protocol developed for in vivo camel embryos (CVP). Cloned embryos responded dynamically to vitrification-warming steps in commercial kits, with a flat shrinkage in the final vitrification solution and a quick re-expansion to the original volume immediately after transferring to the isotonic warming solution. Contrarily, full shrinkage was not observed in CVP method, and majority of embryos were still collapsed post-warming. The immediate re-expansion was highly associated and predictive of higher survival and total cell number, and also better redox state of embryos vitrified by Cryotec and Kitazato kits compared to CVP method. Importantly, while 30% blastomere loss, verified by differential dye exclusion test, was tolerated in vitrified embryos, >50% blastomeres loss in non-expanded blastocysts implied the minimal essential cell survival rate for blastocoelic cavity re-expansion in vitrified cloned camel blastocysts, irrespective of vitrification method. A protocol-based exposure of embryos to cryoprotectants indicated that cryoprotectant toxicity, per se , may not be involved in lower cryosurvival of embryos in CVP vs. Cryotec and Kitazato. The initial pregnancy rates were numerically higher in Cryotec and Kitazato frozen transfers compared to fresh transfer (56.3, 60 and 33.3%, respectively), and importantly, a higher percentage of established pregnancies in vitrified groups passed the critical 3 months period of early embryonic loss compared to sibling fresh clone pregnancies (50, 40, and 10%, respectively). Results confirmed the suitability of Cryotec and Kitazato kits for vitrification of cloned camel embryos and that vitrification may improve pregnancy outcome by weeding out poor competent embryos. • A 30% blastomere loss may be tolerated in vitrified cloned camel embryos. • A >50% blastomere loss may not be tolerated in vitrified cloned camel embryos. • Immediate re-expansion is predictive of survival of vitrified cloned camel embryos. • Vitrification solutions developed for in vivo embryos may not be appropriate for in vitro embryos. • Vitrification improves the pregnancy outcome of cloned camel embryos. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]