Search

Real‐world data (RWD) and real‐world evidence (RWE) are now being routinely used in epidemiology, clinical practice, and post‐approval regulatory decisions. Despite the increasing utility of the methodology and new regulatory guidelines in recent years, there remains a lack of awareness of how this approach can be applied in clinical pharmacology and translational research settings. Therefore, the American Society of Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (ASCPT) held a workshop on March 21st, 2023 entitled "Advancing the Utilization of Real‐World Data (RWD) and Real‐World Evidence (RWE) in Clinical Pharmacology and Translational Research." The work described herein is a summary of the workshop proceedings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite the liver being the primary site for clearance of xenobiotics utilizing a myriad of mechanisms ranging from cytochrome P450 enzyme pathways, glucuronidation, and biliary excretion, there is a dearth of information available as to how the severity of hepatic impairment (HI) can alter drug absorption and disposition (i.e., pharmacokinetics [PK]) as well as their efficacy and safety or pharmacodynamics (PD). In general, regulatory agencies recommend conducting PK studies in subjects with HI when hepatic metabolism/excretion accounts for more than 20% of drug elimination or if the drug has a narrow therapeutic range. In this tutorial, we provide an overview of the global regulatory landscape, clinical measures for hepatic function assessment, methods to stage HI severity, and consequently the impact on labeling. In addition, we provide an in-depth practical guidance for designing and conducting clinical trials for patients with HI and on the application of modeling and simulation strategies in lieu of dedicated trials for dosing recommendations in patients with HI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drug‐drug interaction (DDI) is an important consideration for clinical decision making in prostate cancer treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of enzalutamide, an oral androgen receptor inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of digoxin (P‐glycoprotein [P‐gp] probe substrate) and rosuvastatin (breast cancer resistance protein [BCRP] probe substrate) in men with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This was a phase I, open‐label, fixed‐sequence, crossover study (NCT04094519). Eligible men with mCRPC received a single dose of transporter probe cocktail containing 0.25 mg digoxin and 10 mg rosuvastatin plus enzalutamide placebo‐to‐match on day 1. On day 8, patients started 160 mg enzalutamide once daily through day 71. On day 64, patients also received a single dose of the cocktail. The primary end points were digoxin and rosuvastatin plasma maximum concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration‐time curve from the time of dosing to the last measurable concentration (AUClast), and AUC from the time of dosing extrapolated to time infinity (AUCinf). Secondary end points were enzalutamide and N‐desmethyl enzalutamide (metabolite) plasma Cmax, AUC during a dosing interval, where tau is the length of the dosing interval (AUCtau), and concentration immediately prior to dosing at multiple dosing (Ctrough). When administered with enzalutamide, there was a 17% increase in Cmax, 29% increase in AUClast, and 33% increase in AUCinf of plasma digoxin compared to digoxin alone, indicating that enzalutamide is a "mild" inhibitor of P‐gp. No PK interaction was observed between enzalutamide and rosuvastatin (BCRP probe substrate). The PK of enzalutamide and N‐desmethyl enzalutamide were in agreement with previously reported data. The potential for transporter‐mediated DDI between enzalutamide and digoxin and rosuvastatin is low in men with prostate cancer. Therefore, concomitant administration of enzalutamide with medications that are substrates for P‐gp and BCRP does not require dose adjustment in this patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An impaired renal function, including acute and chronic kidney disease and end‐stage renal disease, can be the result of aging, certain disease conditions, the use of some medications, or as a result of smoking. In patients with renal impairment (RI), the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of drugs or drug metabolites may change and result in increased safety risks or decreased efficacy. In order to make specific dose recommendations in the label of drugs for patients with RI, a clinical trial may have to be conducted or, when not feasible, modeling and simulations approaches, such as population PK modeling or physiologically‐based PK modelling may be applied. This tutorial aims to provide an overview of the global regulatory landscape and a practical guidance for successfully designing and conducting clinical RI trials or, alternatively, on applying modeling and simulation tools to come to a dose recommendation for patients with RI in the most efficient manner. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]