Search

Introduction: Brain arteriovenous malformations (AVM) are complex vascular pathologies with a significant risk of hemorrhage. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective treatment modality for AVM, initially popularized on the Gamma Knife (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) platform, and now benefits from the modern advances in linear accelerator (LINAC)-based platforms. This study evaluates the outcomes of LINAC-based SRS/hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (hFSRT) for cerebral AVMs., Materials and Methods: Between December 2018 and April 2024, 15 patients with cerebral AVMs underwent SRS/hFSRT at a tertiary government hospital. Patient selection was based on AVM size, location, surgical unsuitability, and patient preference. All patients underwent MRI and cerebral angiography for nidus delineation. SRS was planned using Monaco TPS (treatment planning system) (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) with VMAT (volumetric modulated arc therapy) technique, delivering a median dose of 20 Gy in single fractions for small AVMs and 28 Gy in four fractions for large AVMs. Patients were followed up with annual MRI and angiography to assess obliteration., Results: The cohort had a median age of 22 years, with a median nidus volume of 3.76 cc. The crude obliteration rate was 60%, confirmed by MRI/angiography. Actuarial obliteration rates at two, three, and five years were 65.71%, 73.57%, and 77.14%, respectively. Smaller AVMs (<3 cc) and those with a modified AVM radiosurgery score <1.5 had nearly 100% obliteration rates. Large AVMs (>10 cc) treated with hypofractionated SRT showed partial responses only. Significant predictors of obliteration included prescription dose, AVM volume, and modified AVM radiosurgery score., Conclusion: LINAC-based SRS demonstrates comparable efficacy to other modalities for treating cerebral AVMs, with obliteration rates influenced by dose, AVM volume, and pre-treatment radiosurgery score. Larger AVMs pose a greater challenge, suggesting a need for adjunctive treatments or higher fractionated doses to improve outcomes., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institutional Ethics Committee, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur issued approval AIIMS/IEC/2018/782; dated December 22, 2018. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Mohan et al.)

In brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), there is mismatched communication between arteries and veins, causing a nidal bed between them. This systematic review explores whether a magnetic resonance angiogram (MRA) can be used as a diagnostic imaging tool instead of a digital subtraction angiogram (DSA). Utilizing PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar, as well as the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for article selection, a literature search was conducted over the past five years. Eleven studies were included, with a majority of the articles suggesting a potential for consideration. Arterial spin labeling (ASL) versus time-of-flight (TOF) scans was a comparison study, in addition to the study on pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (pc-ASL), which proved its high sensitivity in comparison with DSA scans. Other studies included quantitative magnetic resonance angiogram (Q-MRA) measuring the blood flow and susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) modality. Although promising, digital subtraction angiogram (DSA) scans have diagnostic superiority. In addition, articles discussed follow-up magnetic resonance angiogram (MRA) scans after surgery. Overall, digital subtraction angiogram remains the gold standard due to its superior spatial resolution and hemodynamic properties; these are the key limitations of magnetic resonance studies. MRA has demonstrated its ability to reproduce high-quality diagnostic images for arteriovenous malformation (AVM) angioarchitecture; however, coupled with their limitations, not many studies with large sample sizes over longer periods have been conducted, and we urge more research into it., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2022, Raman et al.)

The localization of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) intraoperatively in the setting of an acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is crucial to avoid damage of delicate vascular structures that may even further exacerbate the bleed. Currently, surgical mapping using preoperative angiographic is the standard of practice. We report the use of intraoperative ultrasound for the diagnosis and localization of an AVM in the case of a 61-year-old female with reported iodine contrast allergy and previous severe reaction, in a setting with limited resources, without other imaging options or timely transfer to another facility readily available. Immediate surgical care was warranted to avoid further deterioration of the patient; intraoperative diagnosis and localization of the suspected underlying lesion were done using ultrasound. The ultrasound display showed tubular anechoic intertwined structures that demonstrated bidirectional flow, which is suggestive of an AVM. The intraoperative diagnosis allowed the surgeon to avoid an inadvertent approach to the vascular malformation nidus or vessels, which could have further complicated the case. We believe that intraoperative ultrasound may be valuable for the neurosurgeons today in many settings. Despite the fact that this case occurred in a scenario with limited resources and no other imaging method (such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)) available, we advise readers not to rely solely on intraoperative ultrasound., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2019, Bertani et al.)