Search

Summary: Each action has sensory consequences that need to be distinguished from sensations arising from the environment. This is accomplished by the comparing of internal predictions about these consequences with the actual afference, thereby isolating the afferent component that is self-produced . Because the sensory consequences of actions vary as a result of changes of the effector''s efficacy, internal predictions need to be updated continuously and on a short time scale. Here, we tested the hypothesis that this updating of predictions about the sensory consequences of actions is mediated by the cerebellum, a notion that parallels the cerebellum''s role in motor learning . Patients with cerebellar lesions and their matched controls were equally able to detect experimental modifications of visual feedback about their pointing movements. When such feedback was constantly rotated, both groups instantly attributed the visual feedback to their own actions. However, in interleaved trials without actual feedback, patients did no longer account for this feedback rotation—neither perceptually nor with respect to motor performance. Both deficits can be explained by an impaired updating of internal predictions about the sensory consequences of actions caused by cerebellar pathology. Thus, the cerebellum guarantees both precise performance and veridical perceptual interpretation of actions. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Summary: Perception and action are governed not only by sensory information but also by prior predictions about sensory events. These sensory predictions allow one to react more rapidly to predictable information in the environment [1] and to perceptually distinguish self-produced and externally produced sensations [2–6]. In order to be accurate, however, all sensory predictions need continuous recalibration to match the changing properties of the environment, the sensorimotor system, or both. Earlier studies showed that the cerebellum is crucial for the recalibration of sensory predictions capturing the sensory consequences of one’s motor behavior [5, 7]. Here we asked whether the cerebellum, a structure intimately linked to plasticity within the motor domain [8–13], also accounts for the recalibration of sensory predictions about external sensory events within the perceptual domain in a nonmotor task. Cerebellar patients and healthy controls were equally able to predict the time of reappearance of a moving target that temporarily disappeared behind an occluder. However, patients were significantly impaired in recalibrating this spatiotemporal prediction to account for an experimentally added delay. This suggests that the cerebellum plays a domain-general role in fine tuning predictive models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]