Search

Aims: The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate SUVs variability with respect to lesion size, administered dose, and reconstruction algorithm., Background: SUV max and SUV peak are influenced by technical factors as count statistics and reconstruction algorithms., Objective: To fulfill the aim, we evaluated the SUVs variability with respect to lesion size, administered dose, and reconstruction algorithm (ordered - subset expectation max imization plus point spread function option - OSEM+PSF, regularized Bayesian Penalized Likelihood - BPL) in a 5 - rings BGO PET/CT scanner., Methods: Discovery IQ scanner (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US) was used for list mode acquisition of 25 FDG patients, 12 injected with 3.7 MBq/kg (Standard Dose protocol - SD) and 13 injected with 1.8 MBq/kg (Low Dose protocol - LD). Each acquisition was reconstructed at different time/FOV with both OSEM+PSF algorithm and BPL using seven different beta factors. SUVs were calculated in 70 lesions and analysed in function of time/FOV and Beta. Image quality was evaluated as a coefficient of variation of the liver (CV - liver)., Results: SUVs were not considerably affected by time/FOV. However, SUVs were influenced by beta: differences were higher in small lesions (37% for SUV max , 15% for SUV peak ) compared to larger ones (14% and 6%). CV - liver ranged from 6% with Beta-500 (LD and SD) to 13% with Beta- 200 (LD). CV - liver of BPL with Beta-350 (optimized for clinical practice in our institution) in LD was lower than CV - liver of OSEM+PSF in SD., Conclusion: When a high sensitivity 5 - rings BGO PET/CT scanner is used with the same reconstruction algorithm, quantification by means of SUV max and SUV peak is a robust standard compared to the activity and scan duration. However, both SUVs and image quality are influenced by reconstruction algorithms and the related parameters should be considered to obtain the best compromise between detectability, quantification, and noise., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Background and Objective: Motion due to patient's breathing can introduce heavy bias in PET/CT, both in image quality and quantitation. This paper is a review of the main technical solutions available to manage movement in PET/CT studies: a) Respiratory Gated (RG), b) Motion Free (MF), c) End Expiration (EE), d) Banana Artefact Management (BAM) and e) Data Driven Gating (DDG)., Methods: The most diffused solutions (RG, MF and EE) are based on LIST mode acquisition of a PET Field of View (4D FOV), centered on the anatomical region of interest; to link PET data not only to time and to spatial position but also to the corresponding breathing phase, the synchronized acquisition of the patient's breathing curve is performed by an external tracking device. Different commercial tools to track and to record patient breathing cycle are available to associate the internal organ motion with a measurable external parameter; for example these systems can measure the pressure on a chest elastic belt, the air flow trough patient nose, the breath-in and breath-out air temperature or the markers movement on the thorax/ abdominal region. Recently DDG techniques are developed to correct respiratory motion without the help of external motion tracking devices and to obtain a comparable result to that based on standard RG protocols., Results: The final result of an RG or DDG protocol is a sequence of 3D images showing organs and lesions movement; using the other motion management options a single 3D motion-free image is obtained without motion artefacts and degradation. Compared to the previously described options the BAM solution is not a real motion management protocol but just a Banana Artefact correction technique obtained using an Attenuation Correction Map calculated merging the Whole Body Helical CT with a Cine CT on the diaphragm area., Conclusion: The motion management in PET/CT imaging shows benefits in terms of image quality, quantification and lesion detectability and it is useful both in diagnostic and radiotherapy planning., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.org.)

Background and Objective: Breathing movement can introduce heavy bias in both image quality and quantitation in PET/CT. The aim of this paper is a review of the literature to evaluate the benefit of respiratory gating in terms of image quality, quantification and lesion detectability., Methods: A review of the literature published in the last 10 years and dealing with gated PET/CT technique has been performed, focusing on improvement in quantification, lesion detectability and diagnostic accuracy in neoplastic lesion. In addition, the improvement in the definition of radiotherapy planning has been evaluated., Results: There is a consistent increase of the Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) in gated PET images when compared to ungated ones, particularly for lesions located in liver and in lung. Respiratory gating can also increase sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of PET/CT. Gated PET/CT can be used for radiation therapy planning, reducing the uncertainty in target definition, optimizing the volume to be treated and reducing the possibility of "missing" during the dose delivery. Moreover, new technologies, able to define the movement of lesions and organs directly from the PET sinogram, can solve some problems that currently are limiting the clinical use of gated PET/CT (i.e.: extended acquisition time, radiation exposure)., Conclusion: The published literature demonstrated that respiratory gating PET/CT is a valid technique to improve quantification, lesion detectability of lung and liver tumors and can better define the radiotherapy planning of moving lesions and organs. If new technical improvements for motion compensation will be clinically validated, gated technique could be applied routinely in any PET/CT scan., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.org.)