Search

Objective: Intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IP ChT) is an emerging modality in the treatment of advanced gastric adenocarcinoma with peritoneal disease. Cytological evaluation of peritoneal fluid specimens from patients undergoing IP ChT is important in clinical management. However, direct intraperitoneal exposure to chemotherapeutic agents induces cytomorphological changes in benign constituents of peritoneal fluid, presenting particular challenges to accurate cytological interpretation. These morphological changes have not been well characterised in the literature. We systematically reviewed the cytomorphological features in immunocytochemically-confirmed positive and negative IP ChT peritoneal fluid samples to elucidate the degree of morphological overlap between malignant and reactive cells., Methods: We reviewed 39 peritoneal fluid samples of patients treated with IP ChT, and scored specific cytomorphological parameters of both benign and malignant cells with the aid of relevant immunocytochemical interrogation., Results: The present findings show a significant degree of morphological overlap between reactive and malignant cells. Abnormal, "exploding" mitotic figures, nuclear membrane irregularities, multi-nucleation and cytoplasmic vacuolation were commonly observed in negative fluid specimens. The most helpful feature that favoured malignant cells was the increased nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio. A background inflammatory milieu of eosinophils and/or neutrophils was seen in 45-58% of post IP ChT peritoneal fluid specimens. The presence of pseudoparakeratotic cells, a novel observation in post IP ChT fluid specimens is also described., Conclusions: The extent of reactive cytomorphological anomalies arising from treatment with IP ChT poses unique diagnostic challenges and may prompt a malignant or 'atypical' diagnosis in benign reactive samples., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: To compare the rejection rates of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) samples obtained by differing sampling methods for testing by Sanger sequencing for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. To assess the association between unsatisfactory outcomes and the quantity of DNA extracted from cytological versus histological samples., Methods: Six hundred and seventy NSCLC samples referred to our centre from 2008 to 2010 were reviewed as a consequence of sample rejection, presence of EGFR mutations, cytological versus histological sampling methods, DNA quantity and the unsatisfactory genotyping rate., Results: Eighty samples were rejected for testing in similar proportions of histological and cytological samples (11.9% versus 10.9%) usually (n = 75) because the amount of cellular material was judged insufficient in small biopsies or cytology samples. The remaining 590 samples on which EGFR testing was attempted yielded 51 (8.6%) unsatisfactory test outcomes caused by failure of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (n = 47 cases), uninterpretable Sanger chromatograms (n = 3 cases) and insufficient DNA extracted for PCR (n = 1 case). The difference in rates of unsatisfactory outcomes between cytological samples (seven of 147 samples or 4.7%) versus tissue samples (44 of 443 samples or 9.9%) was clinically relevant but not statistically significant (Mann-Whitney test; P < 0.081). There was no association between the concentration of DNA extracted and the likelihood of an unsatisfactory analysis; which was similar in all types of sections (large and small) while 0% of 37 cytology slides were unsatisfactory., Conclusions: Utilizing cytology samples for EGFR testing avoids unnecessary patient re-biopsing and yields a clinically superior satisfactory rate to the overall satisfactory rate of tissue biopsies of NSCLC. The quality rather than quantity of DNA extracted may be a more important determinant of a satisfactory result., (© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Background: Sanger sequencing is one of several reliable methods in use to detect KRAS and BRAF mutations to facilitate clinical patient selection for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody therapy in unresectable metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC). Most analyses are made on pretreatment biopsy or resection specimens. There is a scarcity of published studies on the suitability of cytological samples for KRAS testing in this setting., Methods: DNA extraction was attempted on 11 search-retrieved paired cases of histological resections or excisions of CRC and their corresponding cytological samples (representing metastases) and tested for KRAS mutations in exon 2 and 3, as well as BRAF exon 15 mutations by Sanger sequencing. Only KRAS wild-type cases were subjected to BRAF analysis because this is the setting with true diagnostic value, as these mutations are mutually exclusive., Results: Of the 11 paired cases analysed, only eight histology cases showed satisfactory DNA quality for sequencing. Thus, only eight of the corresponding cytology cases were analysed. Seven of the eight cases tested showed the same KRAS genotype on both the aspirated cytology specimen of metastatic carcinoma and the primary tumour (histological specimen), from which we derive an overall concordance rate of 87.5%. The single discordant case was likely to be a true difference as it was demonstrated again on repeat testing of both samples. No BRAF mutations were detected on the four KRAS wild-type cases., Conclusion: A range of cytological samples are suitable for KRAS and BRAF mutation testing, be it from previously stained preparations or cell blocks. These samples would be highly valuable in cases where cytological samples are the only material available for mutation testing., (© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Objective: Studies have shown that c-kit mutation analysis of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) can be routinely performed. We validated c-kit exon 11 mutational analysis on cell block material obtained from fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) for diagnostic purposes and compared it with the same analysis in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded full sections of the corresponding resection specimens., Methods: c-kit mutation analysis was done on cell block material obtained from ten cases encountered in our department from 1999 to 2008 on which FNAC was attempted pre-operatively. The findings were compared with analysis on full paraffin section of the corresponding resected tumours in seven cases where patients opted for resection. c-kit exon 11 was examined via bidirectional nucleic acid sequencing., Results: Our results showed 100% concordance for the presence and type of exon 11 mutation in the resected and aspirated tumours in all seven cases. These mutations had diagnostic value when compared with other neoplasms that are part of the cytomorphological differential diagnosis, such as leiomyosarcoma or gastric adenocarcinomas., Conclusion: Molecular cytopathology is a powerful tool that can complement morphology and immunohistochemical assessment of cytological material in routine practice for the diagnosis and prognostication of GISTs. We briefly discuss the advantages and limitations of the fine needle method of obtaining tissue for the diagnosis and prognostication of GISTs, and its current therapeutic strategies.