1. In an Era that Demands Multilateral Responses to External Threats, Does the UK Have the Capacity for Independent Strategic Design and Action?
- Author
-
Kingdon, BrigadierBill
- Subjects
- *
MULTINATIONAL armed forces , *MILITARY strategy , *MILITARY science , *NATIONAL security , *INTERNATIONAL alliances , *COALITIONS , *LEADERSHIP , *COMMAND of troops , *DECISION making , *INTERNATIONAL security , *MILITARY policy - Abstract
Strategy has become a term so widespread that it has lost virtually all value. Its meaning has expanded so that it no longer applies solely to the application of military power. Even for those who seek to apply the discipline of strategy to matters that affect national, regional or even global security, the impact of transnational factors and the increasing imperative to act as part of a coalition or alliance suggest that strategic theory is increasingly different from practice. Multilateral responses challenge the clear articulation of ends, ways and means, and the act of intervention changes the context in ways that are often impossible to anticipate. This paper explores oblique decision-making, and its role in addressing complex problems for which scientific processes seem ill-suited. It challenges the assumption that shortage of resources and inadequate analysis of the theatre of operations are at the heart of our difficulties with strategy. Greater problems result from failures to clearly articulate the purpose for which we are employing military, and other instruments of power, and from identifying ends for which the prescribed ways and means are mismatched. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF