Search

Background: Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma (PCBCL) classically presents with papules, plaques, and nodules/tumors. Previous reports of PCBCL manifesting with macular lesions are scarce and focused on primary cutaneous follicle-center cell lymphoma (PCFCL). Objectives: The objective of this study was to report our experience with PCBCL presenting with erythematous macules. Methods: Patients with low-grade PCBCL manifesting with erythematous patches, diagnosed and managed between January 2000 through December 2019 at 2 tertiary cutaneous-lymphoma outpatient clinics, were included. Clinical data were retrospectively collected, and biopsy specimens of the macules, and if present of the typical nodular/tumoral lesions, were reviewed. Results: There were 14 patients, aged 16–67 years, 8 had PCFCL and 6 marginal zone lymphoma (PCMZL). All had 1–15 cm erythematous macules, mimicking: interstitial granuloma annulare/vascular tumors/early-stage folliculotropic mycosis fungoides, or presenting with figurate erythema or livedo reticularis-like/net-like pattern. In 3 patients, macules were the presenting lesions, in 2 as the sole manifestation, whereas in 12 patients, typical PCBCL lesions were observed during disease course. The macules showed in all, superficial and deep perivascular infiltrates, and in most, periadnexal infiltrates. Micronodules were observed in 11 specimens, with nodular infiltrates also observed in 4. B cells comprised the majority of the lymphocytes in only 4. Seven of 11 cases tested showed immunoglobulin heavy chain monoclonality. Conclusions: PCMZL and PCFCL may manifest with erythematous macules. Physicians should be aware of this unusual manifestation of low-grade PCBCL, which may represent a clinicopathological diagnostic pitfall.

Background: The incidence of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRI)-induced papulopustular rash is 60–85%. Objective: To investigate prophylactic topical treatment for EGFRI-induced rash. Methods: A single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Adult cancer patients initiating treatment with EGFRIs were randomized to receive facial topical treatment with chloramphenicol 3% + prednisolone 0.5% (CHL-PRED) ointment, chloramphenicol 3% (CHL) ointment, or aqua cream (AQUA). The primary end points were the incidence of ≥grade 3 rash using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), on days 14 and 30. A subanalysis was conducted for incidence of a protocol-specified significant rash, defined as ≥10 facial papulopustular lesions. Results: The per-protocol analysis on day 14 included 69 patients, who received CHL-PRED (21), CHL (23), or AQUA (25). The incidence of CTCAE ≥grade 3 rash was not statistically significant between arms; however, the incidence of the protocol-specified significant rash was: CHL-PRED 14%, CHL 39%, and AQUA 48% (p = 0.03, CHL-PRED vs. AQUA). At 30 days, the CTCAE ≥grade 3 incidence was similar, but the incidences of protocol-specified significant rash were 6%, 16%, and 43% (p = 0.03, CHL-PRED vs. AQUA). No significant differences were found between CHL and CHL-PRED and between CHL and AQUA. Conclusions: Prophylactic topical CHL-PRED was efficacious when compared to AQUA, in the treatment of EGFRI-induced facial papulopustular rash.