Search

Failure of membrane distillation (MD) due to pore wetting by amphiphilic molecules has recently received growing interests because it is a critical challenge to overcome for MD to be applicable for treating unconventional feed water. Recent MD studies using feed solutions containing surfactants have elucidated fundamental mechanism of wetting and generated practical solutions for wetting mitigation. However, what remains unclear is the impact of surfactant species on pore wetting kinetics. Based on a recently developed kinetic model for surfactant-induced pore wetting in MD, we hypothesize that the surface excess concentration of a surfactant is the most important surfactant property in affecting the pore wetting kinetics. In this study, we performed controlled MD wetting experiments using seven different types of surfactants and measured their respective breakthrough time as a quantitative metric for wetting kinetics. Our experiments reveal a good linear correlation between the surface excess concentration and breakthrough time for most but one tested surfactant. When surface excess concentration and diffusion coefficient are both considered, the model-simulated breakthrough time matches the experimentally measurement remarkably well for all tested surfactants.

Optimizing system design and operation of reverse osmosis (RO) systems requires an in-depth comprehension of the intrinsic tradeoff between RO mass transfer kinetics and energetics. In this study, we demonstrate that this critical trade-off can be quantified using the relationship between the average water flux and the specific energy consumption (SEC). We derive analytical expressions to quantify the average water flux and SEC for single stage, two stage, and closed circuit RO processes. These analytical expressions are useful for system design and operation optimization as they facilitate direct comparison of the kinetic and energetic efficiencies between RO processes with different operation conditions and system configurations. Finally, we compare the kinetics and energetics of the three system configurations using these analytical expressions and discuss their relative advantages and disadvantages in RO desalination.

Reverse osmosis (RO), currently the most energy efficient desalination process, is inherently more energy intensive compared to conventional fresh water treatment technologies, as it is constrained by the thermodynamics of separation of saline solutions. Therefore, pushing the energy consumption towards the thermodynamic limit of separation would lead to significant long-term savings in energy cost. In this work, we quantitatively demonstrate the potential of energy reduction for RO desalination using staged operations with both multi-stage direct pass and closed-circuit configurations. We relate the minimum specific energy of desalination (i.e., the minimum energy required to generate a unit volume of permeate water) to the number of stages in each configuration, and elucidate the fundamental difference between the two configurations. Our analysis suggests that although it is theoretically impossible to reach the thermodynamic minimum energy of separation with closed-circuit RO, this configuration is robust and much more practical to implement than the multi-stage direct pass RO.

Forward osmosis (FO) has been extensively investigated in the past decade. Despite significant advancements in our understanding of the FO process, questions and challenges remain regarding the energy efficiency and current state of the technology. Here, we critically review several key aspects of the FO process, focusing on energy efficiency, membrane properties, draw solutes, fouling reversibility, and effective applications of this emerging technology. We analyze the energy efficiency of the process, disprove the common misguided notion that FO is a low energy process, and highlight the potential use of low-cost energy sources. We address the key necessary membrane properties for FO, stressing the importance of the structural parameter, reverse solute flux selectivity, and the constraints imposed by the permeability–selectivity tradeoff. We then dispel the notion that draw solution regeneration can use negligible energy, highlighting the beneficial qualities of small inorganic and thermolytic salts as draw solutes. We further discuss the fouling propensity of FO, emphasizing the fouling reversibility of FO compared to reverse osmosis (RO) and the prospects of FO in treating high fouling potential feed waters. Lastly, we discuss applications where FO outperforms other desalination technologies and emphasize that the FO process is not intended to replace RO, but rather is to be used to process feed waters that cannot be treated by RO.

Multi-wall carbon nanotube (MWCNT)/aromatic polyamide (PA) nanocomposite membranes were synthesized by a polymer grafting process. Surface morphology, roughness, and mechanical strength of the resultant nanocomposite membranes were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and micro-strain analysis, respectively. SEM and AFM images showed that MWCNTs were well dispersed in the PA matrix. Measurements of mechanical properties of this composite showed increasing membrane strength with increasing MWCNT content with monotonic increases in Young's modulus, toughness, and tensile strength. The addition of MWCNTs also improved the rejection of both salt and organic matter relative to the 10% PA membrane base case. The nanocomposite membrane synthesized with 15 mg/g MWCNT in a 10% PA casting solution rejected NaCl and humic acid by factors of 3.17 and 1.67 respectively relative to the PA membrane without MWCNTs, while membrane permeability decreased by 6.5%.