Search

Guidance and patterning of axons are orchestrated by cell-surface receptors and ligands that provide directional cues. Interactions between the Robo receptor and Slit ligand families of proteins initiate signaling cascades that repel axonal outgrowth. Although the vascular and nervous systems grow as parallel networks, the mechanisms by which the vascular endothelial cells are guided to their appropriate positions remain obscure. We have identified a putative Robo homologue, Robo4, based on its differential expression in mutant mice with defects in vascular sprouting. In contrast to known neuronal Robo family members, the arrangement of the extracellular domains of Robo4 diverges significantly from that of all other Robo family members. Moreover, Robo4 is specifically expressed in the vascular endothelium during murine embryonic development. We show that Robo4 binds Slit and inhibits cellular migration in a heterologous expression system, analogous to the role of known Robo receptors in the nervous system. Immunoprecipitation studies indicate that Robo4 binds to Mena, a known effector of Robo-Slit signaling. Finally, we show that Robo4 is the only Robo family member expressed in primary endothelial cells and that application of Slit inhibits their migration. These data demonstrate that Robo4 is a bona fide member of the Robo family and may provide a repulsive cue to migrating endothelial cells during vascular development. Keywords: Vascular development; Angiogenesis; Endothelial migration; Vascular sprouting; Activin receptor-like kinase 1 (Alk1); HHT; Neuronal/vascular guidance; Roundabout (Robo); Slit; Vascular patterning

Several characteristic morphological and functional differences distinguish arteries from veins. It was thought that hemodynamic forces shaped these differences; however, increasing evidence suggests that morphogenetic programs play a central role in blood vessel differentiation. Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is a vascular dysplasia characterized by the inappropriate fusion of arterioles with venules. The genes implicated in this disease, ALK1 and endoglin, may be involved in defining the fundamental boundaries between arteries and veins. We previously showed that mice lacking Alk1 lost structural, molecular, and functional distinctions between arteries and veins [Nat. Genet. 26 (2000), 328]. Here, we report that mice lacking endoglin develop arterial-venous malformations and fail to confine intraembryonic hematopoiesis to arteries. In contrast to Alk1 mutants, endoglin mutants do not show profound vessel dilation or downregulation of arterial ephrinB2. Finally, our data indicate that a failure in cardiac cushion formation observed in both strains may be secondary to the peripheral vasculature defect. The phenotypic similarities, yet reduced severity, implicates endoglin as an accessory coreceptor that specifically modulates Alk1 signaling. We propose that endoglin and Alk1 are necessary for the maintenance of distinct arterial-venous vascular beds and that attenuation of the Alk1 signaling pathway is the precipitating event in the etiology of HHT. Keywords: Alk1; Acvrl1: Endoglin: Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT); Arteriovenous malformations: Arteriovenous identity