Search

Aims Materials and Methods Results Conclusions Both pioglitazone and glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) alone improve metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatohepatitis (MASH) in randomized clinical trials, whereas preclinical studies suggested MASH benefits with sodium glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). In the real world, patients with type 2 diabetes often require multiple agents for glycaemic control. Here, we investigated the benefits of combining these agents on risks of MASH.Longitudinal changes in FibroScan‐aspartate aminotransferase (FAST) score were measured in 888 patients with type 2 diabetes. Use of pioglitazone, GLP1RA and/or SGLT2i was defined as continuous prescriptions of ≥180 days prior to their last reassessment FibroScan. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the associations between use of these agents and FAST score changes.Over a median follow‐up of 3.9 years, the increasing number of these agents used was significantly associated with more reductions in FAST score (p for trend <0.01). Dual combination was independently associated with a higher likelihood of achieving low FAST score at reassessment than single use of any of these agents (odds ratio [OR] 2.84, p = 0.01). Among the different drug combinations, using SGLT2i and pioglitazone (median dose 15 mg daily) together, as compared to not using any of these three agents, was associated with a higher likelihood of both low FAST score at reassessment (OR 6.51, p = 0.008) and FAST score regression (OR 12.52, p = 0.009), after adjusting for changes in glycaemic control and body weight during the study.Combining SGLT2i and pioglitazone is a potentially useful strategy to ameliorate ‘at‐risk’ MASH in patients with type 2 diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To identify unique clinical phenotypes in type 2 diabetes (T2D) and investigate their treatment response to canagliflozin using latent class analysis. Methods: This was a pooled latent class analysis of the individuals in the CANVAS Program and CREDENCE trial. The co‐primary endpoints were hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) and the composite of cardiovascular death (CVD) or HHF. Secondary endpoints included three‐point major adverse CV events, its individual components, and all‐cause mortality. We completed Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the effect of canagliflozin across phenotypes. Results: Four distinct phenotypes were identified: Phenotype 1 (n = 966, 6.6%), with the lowest prevalence of heart failure, kidney dysfunction and hypertension; Phenotype 2 (n = 4169, 28.7%), primarily comprising females with a high prevalence of atherosclerotic vascular disease (ASCVD); Phenotype 3 (n = 7108, 48.9%), predominately males with a high prevalence of ASCVD; and Phenotype 4 (n = 2300, 15.8%), possessing the highest prevalences of HF and renal dysfunction. A hierarchical increase in the risk of the primary endpoint was observed across the phenotypes, with the highest CV risk observed for Phenotype 4 (hazard ratio for HHF: 7.57 [95% CI: 4.19‐13.69]). Canagliflozin significantly reduced HHF and the composite CVD or HHF across phenotypes (all P values for interaction >.05). Conclusion: We identified four clinically distinct T2D phenotypes with differential CV risks. Canagliflozin reduced the risk of CV events, irrespective of the phenotype, emphasizing its broad therapeutic acceptability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To investigate the efficacy and safety of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1RAs) and sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in liver transplant (LT) recipients with diabetes. Methods: A single‐centre, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from an LT recipient database (1990–2023) was conducted. We included adults with pre‐existing diabetes and post‐transplant diabetes, newly started on GLP‐1RAs and/or SGLT2 inhibitors after LT. Metabolic and biochemical parameters and outcomes were collected for up to 12 months after starting medications and were compared to those in patients receiving dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4) inhibitors. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and linear mixed models. Results: We included participants on GLP‐1RAs (n = 46), SGLT2 inhibitors (n = 87), combination therapy (n = 12), and a DPP‐4 inhibitor comparator (n = 217). Both GLP‐1RAs and combination therapy decreased mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, and combination therapy remained significant when adjusted for DPP‐4 inhibitor treatment (−3.5%, 95% CI [−6.1, −0.95]; p = 0.0089) at 12 months. All three groups had significant decreases in mean weight and body mass index, but these remained significant in the GLP‐1RA (−5.2 kg, 95% CI [−8.7, −1.7], p = 0.0039 and 1.99 kg/m2, 95% CI [−3.4, −0.6], p = 0.0048) and combination therapy groups (−5.4 kg, 95% CI [−10.5, −0.36], p = 0.04 and −3.4 kg/m2, 95% CI [−5.5, −1.3], p = 0.0015) when adjusted for DPP‐4 inhibitor treatment at 12 months. Alanine aminotransferase levels decreased with GLP‐1RA and combination therapy. There were two (1.4%) cases of graft rejection. Conclusion: We found that GLP‐1RAs, SGLT2 inhibitors, and their combination, led to significant weight loss in LT recipients with diabetes. Combination therapy, in particular, lowered HbA1c and alanine aminotransferase levels compared to DPP‐4 inhibitors. Further studies are needed to assess long‐term safety and efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To validate the Klinrisk machine learning model for prediction of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression in patients with type 2 diabetes in the pooled CANVAS/CREDENCE trials. Materials and Methods: We externally validated the Klinrisk model for prediction of CKD progression, defined as 40% or higher decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or kidney failure. Model performance was assessed for prediction up to 3 years with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Brier scores and calibration plots of observed and predicted risks. We compared performance of the model with standard of care using eGFR (G1‐G4) and urine albumin‐creatinine ratio (A1‐A3) Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) heatmap categories. Results: The Klinrisk model achieved an AUC of 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78‐0.83) at 1 year, and 0.88 (95% CI 0.86‐0.89) at 3 years. The Brier scores were 0.020 (0.018‐0.022) and 0.056 (0.052‐0.059) at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Compared with the KDIGO heatmap, the Klinrisk model had improved performance at every interval (P <.01). Conclusions: The Klinrisk machine learning model, using routinely collected laboratory data, was highly accurate in its prediction of CKD progression in the CANVAS/CREDENCE trials. Integration of the model in electronic medical records or laboratory information systems can facilitate risk‐based care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To examine the renal effects of sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibition among non‐diabetic individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in a real‐world setting. Methods: We collected de‐identified data on adults without diabetes and with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 25–60 mL/min/1.73 m2, who initiated the SGLT2 inhibitors dapagliflozin or empagliflozin between September 2020 and November 2022 at Maccabi Healthcare Services, an Israeli health maintenance organization. We assessed the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on renal function (changes in eGFR slope/time). Index date was defined as the date of the first dispensing of SGLT2 inhibitors. Annual baseline slope was calculated using all eGFR measurements during the 2 years prior to index date (median = 7 measurements), while annual follow‐up slope was calculated from all evaluations during 90–900 days post index date, along with baseline measurement at index date (median = 6 measurements). Paired t tests were used to compare differences between baseline and follow‐up annual slopes. Results: Of a total of 354 participants with CKD, without diabetes, who received SGLT2 inhibitors and were followed for a median of 527 days, the mean age was 72.8 ± 11.8 years, 26% were female, and 91% used renin‐angiotensin system blockade. The mean eGFR was 45.4 ± 9.5 mL/min/1.73 m2. The mean body mass index was 29.1 ± 5.4 kg/m2. During the year before index date, 146 participants (41%) had a urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) <30 mg/g, 81 (23%) had a UACR of 30–300 mg/g, 74 (21%) had a UACR >300 mg/g, and 53 (15%) had no UACR evaluation. The mean eGFR slope over time was −5.6 ± 7.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year at baseline, which improved to −1.7 ± 6.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year after SGLT2 inhibitor administration (p <0.001). This effect was independent of UACR. Conclusion: In a real‐world study of primarily older non‐diabetic adults with CKD, SGLT2 inhibition was associated with a slower rate of kidney function decline, regardless of baseline UACR level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To compare the risk of developing kidney outcomes with use of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1RAs) versus use of sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibitors among individuals with diabetes. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we analysed 12 338 individuals with diabetes who newly initiated SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP‐1RAs using data from the JMDC claims database. The primary outcome was change in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), estimated using a linear mixed‐effects model. A 1:4 propensity‐score‐matching algorithm was used to compare the changes in eGFR between GLP‐1RA and SGLT2 inhibitor users. Results: After propensity‐score matching, 2549 individuals (median [range] age 52 [46–58] years, 80.6% men) were analysed (510 GLP‐1RA new users and 2039 SGLT2 inhibitor new users). SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with a slower eGFR decline when compared with GLP‐1RA use (−1.41 [95% confidence interval −1.63 to −1.19] mL/min/1.73 m2 vs. −2.62 [95% confidence interval −3.15 to −2.10] mL/min/1.73 m2). Conclusions: Our analysis demonstrates the potential advantages of SGLT2 inhibitors over GLP‐1RAs in terms of kidney outcomes in individuals with diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aggressive therapy of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) can not only slow the progression of DKD to renal failure but, if utilized at an early enough stage of DKD, can also stabilize and/or reverse the decline in renal function. The currently recognized standard of therapy for DKD is blockade of the renin‐angiotensin system with angiotensin‐converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). However, unless utilized at a very early stage, monotherapy with these drugs in DKD will only prevent or slow the progression of DKD and will neither stabilize nor reverse the progression of DKD to renal decompensation. Recently, the addition of a sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 inhibitor and/or a mineralocorticoid receptor blocker to ACE inhibitors or ARBs has been clearly shown to further decelerate the decline in renal function. The use of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) agonists shown promise in decelerating the progression of DKD. Other drugs that may aid in the deceleration the progression of DKD are dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, pentoxifylline, statins, and vasodilating beta blockers. Therefore, aggressive therapy with combinations of these drugs (stacking) should improve the preservation of renal function in DKD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of saxagliptin/dapagliflozin and insulin glargine in people with latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA). Methods: In this phase 2b multicentre, open‐label, comparator‐controlled, parallel‐group, non‐inferiority study, we randomly assigned 33 people with LADA who had a fasting C‐peptide concentration ≥0.2 nmol/L (0.6 ng/mL) to receive 1‐year daily treatment with either the combination of saxagliptin (5 mg) plus dapagliflozin (10 mg) or insulin glargine (starting dose: 10 IU), both on top of metformin. The primary outcome was the 2‐h mixed meal‐stimulated C‐peptide area under the curve (AUC), measured 12 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes were glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, change in body mass index (BMI), and hypoglycaemic events. Results: In the modified intention‐to‐treat analysis, the primary outcome was similar in participants assigned to saxagliptin/dapagliflozin or to insulin glargine (median C‐peptide AUC: 152.0 ng*min/mL [95% confidence interval {CI} 68.2; 357.4] vs. 122.2 ng*min/mL [95% CI 84.3; 255.8]; p for noninferiority = 0.0087). Participants randomized to saxagliptin/dapagliflozin lost more weight than those randomized to insulin glargine (median BMI change at the end of the study: −0.4 kg/m2 [95% CI −1.6; −0.3] vs. +0.4 kg/m2 [95% CI −0.3; +1.1]; p = 0.0076). No differences in HbA1c or in the number of participants experiencing hypoglycaemic events were found. Conclusions: Saxagliptin/dapagliflozin was non‐inferior to glargine in terms of β‐cell function in this 12‐month, small, phase 2b study, enrolling people with LADA with still viable endogenous insulin production. Weight loss was greater with saxagliptin/dapagliflozin, with no differences in glycaemic control or hypoglycaemic risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To assess the risk of amputation associated with sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) among patients with type 2 diabetes, across categories of baseline cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diuretic use (DU). Materials and Methods: We conducted an active comparator, new‐user cohort study using Korea's nationwide claims data (2015‐2020). The study cohort consisted of patients with type 2 diabetes who initiated SGLT2is or dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors (DPP4is). Cohort entry was defined by first prescription date. We then classified patients into four discrete subcohorts based on their baseline status of CVD and DU as (1) CVD+/DU+, (2) CVD+/DU‐, (3) CVD‐/DU+ and (4) CVD‐/DU‐. We performed 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching within each cohort and estimated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk of amputation with SGLT2is versus DPP4is using Cox models. Results: We identified 219 900 PS‐matched pairs of SGLT2is and DPP4is (CVD+/DU+, n = 11 719; CVD+/DU‐, n = 26 092; CVD‐/DU+, n = 26 894; and CVD‐/DU‐, n = 155 195), with well‐balanced baseline covariates across all cohorts. Significantly lower risks of amputation with SGLT2is versus DPP4is were found in CVD+/DU+ (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.14‐0.90), CVD+/DU‐ (0.45, 0.21‐0.99) and CVD‐/DU‐ (0.48, 0.33‐0.70), but not in CVD‐/DU+ (0.54, 0.26‐1.12). Consistent trends in estimates were found across various sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: Initiating SGLT2is against DPP4is did not increase the risk of amputation across patient populations of varying vulnerability. These findings based on routine practice will reassure clinicians of the safety of SGLT2is with regard to amputation risk in selected high‐risk patients with type 2 diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are particularly effective in preventing adverse outcomes of heart failure and chronic kidney disease, which are highly prevalent in the elderly. Here, we aimed to access the safety of SGLT2i in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. Materials and Methods: We performed a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting safety outcomes of the elderly (≥65 years) patients with type 2 diabetes, randomized to an SGLT2i or placebo. We recorded the incidence of acute kidney injury, volume depletion, genital tract infections, urinary tract infections, bone fractures, amputations, diabetic ketoacidosis, hypoglycaemia and drug discontinuation, by group of treatment. Results: Of the 130 RCTs screened, only six reported data on elderly patients. In total, 19 986 patients were included. The SGLT2i discontinuation rate was approximately 20%. The risk of acute kidney injury was significantly lower among SGLT2i users compared with placebo [risk ratio (RR) 0.73; 95% CI 0.62‐0.87]. SGLT2i were associated with a six‐fold increased risk of genital tract infections (RR 6.55; 95% CI 2.09‐20.5). The rate of amputations was increased only among canagliflozin users (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.25‐3). The risk of fractures, urinary tract infection, volume depletion, hypoglycaemia and diabetic ketoacidosis was similar between SGLT2i and placebo. Conclusions: SGLT2is were well tolerated in the elderly. However, older patients are underrepresented in most RCTs and a call for action is need to favour clinical trials reporting safety outcomes stratified by age. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To pool the effects of sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on gout and to investigate the association of these effects with baseline serum uric acid (SUA), SUA lowering, and underlying conditions, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)/heart failure (HF). Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and clinical trial registry websites were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or post hoc analyses (≥1‐year duration; PROSPERO:CRD42023418525). The primary outcome was a composite of gouty arthritis/gout flares and commencement of anti‐gout drugs (SUA‐lowering drugs/colchicine). Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled using a generic inverse‐variance method with a random‐effects model. Mixed‐effects model univariate meta‐regression analysis was performed. Results: Five RCTs involving 29 776 patients (T2DM, n = 23 780) and 1052 gout‐related events were identified. Compared to placebo, SGLT2 inhibitor use was significantly associated with reduced risk of composite gout outcomes (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.45‐0.67; I2 = 61%, P < 0.001). Treatment benefits did not differ between trials being conducted exclusively in baseline HF versus those conducted in patients with T2DM (P‐interaction = 0.37), but were greater with dapagliflozin 10 mg and canagliflozin 100/300 mg (P < 0.01 for subgroup differences). Sensitivity analysis excluding trials that evaluated the effects of empagliflozin 10/25 mg (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.57‐0.81; I2 = 0%) accentuated the benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors with no between‐trial heterogeneity (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.39‐0.55; I2 = 0%). Univariate meta‐regression found no impact of baseline SUA, SUA lowering on follow‐up, diuretic use, or other variables on their anti‐gout effects. Conclusion: We found that SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of gout in individuals with T2DM/HF. Lack of an association with SUA‐lowering effects suggests that metabolic and anti‐inflammatory effects of SGLT2 inhibitors may predominantly mediate their anti‐gout benefits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: In the CANVAS Program and CREDENCE trials, the sodium glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitor canagliflozin reduced the risk of cardiovascular and kidney events in patients with type 2 diabetes. The current study analysed a pooled population to ascertain the kidney protection provided by canagliflozin across the full spectrum of kidney parameters. Methods: This post‐hoc pooled analysis of the CANVAS Program (N = 10 142) and CREDENCE trial (N = 4401), assessed the risk of the primary kidney composite (doubling of serum creatinine, end‐stage kidney disease, renal death), in all patients and subgroups defined by baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (<30, 30 to <45, 45 to <60 and ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2), albuminuria [<30, 30‐300, >300 mg/g (<3.39, 3.39‐33.9, >33.9 mg/mmol)] and 2012 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) classification of chronic kidney disease (low/moderate, high and very high risk). Results: In the overall population, the risk for the primary kidney composite outcome was 37% lower in the canagliflozin group versus placebo (HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.77; p <.001). There was no evidence of heterogeneity in the kidney protective effects of canagliflozin across a range of kidney risks when stratified by baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate, albuminuria or KDIGO risk category (all pinteraction >.05). A statistically significant risk reduction of the primary kidney composite outcome was sustained by approximately 18 months after randomization. Conclusions: These results emphasize a critical role of canagliflozin in kidney protection across a broad spectrum of participants with type 2 diabetes with varying levels of kidney function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

People with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and those with prediabetes have an increased risk of heart failure (HF). Longer duration of T2DM correlates with a greater risk of HF, but HF is also seen in patients with recent‐onset diabetes. Insulin resistance is more likely to be present in patients with HF. The risk of HF persists even in the face of standard‐of‐care preventive treatments for atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) disease. HF is commonly the presenting symptom of CV disease in people with diabetes and is the most expensive complication of diabetes because of the high cost of hospitalizations. Recently hospitalization for HF has been included in CV outcome trials (CVOTs), including for medications that are used to treat T2DM, which has led to new therapies for all HF patients. In addition, these CVOTs have shown that many drugs used in the therapy of diabetes are either neutral or detrimental in the HF patient and should be used with caution in patients with existing HF or those at high risk of HF. Most recently, sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 receptor blockers have shown efficacy in both HF with reduced ejection fraction (EF) and HF with preserved EF. The only other oral or injectable diabetes agent shown to improve outcomes in both is metformin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To investigate the impact of sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on the risk of incident heart failure and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Methods: All patients with diabetes who were registered between January 2018 and December 2019 were identified from a federated electronic medical record database (TriNetX) and followed up for 2 years. A 1:1 propensity‐score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to balance the SGLT2 inhibitor and non‐SGLT2 inhibitor cohorts. The primary outcome was incident heart failure. Secondary outcomes included all‐cause mortality, cardiac arrest, ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF), incident atrial fibrillation (AF), ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA), composite of arterial and venous thrombotic events, and composite of incident VT/VF and cardiac arrest. Results: A total of 131 189 and 2 692 985 patients were treated with and without SGLT2 inhibitors, respectively. After PSM, 131 188 patients remained in each group. The risk of incident heart failure was significantly lower in the SGLT2 inhibitor cohort compared to the non‐SGLT2 inhibitor cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68‐0.73). SGLT2 inhibitor use was also associated with a significantly lower risk of all‐cause mortality (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.58‐0.64), cardiac arrest (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.63‐0.78), incident AF (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.76‐0.84), ischaemic stroke/TIA (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.88‐0.93), composite of arterial and venous thrombotic events (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.88‐0.92), and composite of incident VT/VF and cardiac arrest (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.71‐0.81). There were no significant differences for VT/VF (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88‐1.00). Conclusion: Use of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of incident heart failure and adverse cardiovascular outcomes but not ventricular arrhythmias. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To investigate factors associated with proteinuria regression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with canagliflozin. Materials and Methods: This study was a post hoc analysis of the CANDLE trial (UMIN000017669), which compared the effect of 24 weeks of treatment with canagliflozin or glimepiride for changes in N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide in patients with T2DM and chronic heart failure (CHF). Factors associated with regression of proteinuria at 24 weeks were evaluated with multivariate logistic models. Results: The rate of regression of proteinuria was higher (28/102, 27.5% vs. 12/112, 10.7%), and that of progression was lower (9/102, 8.8% vs. 26/112, 23.2%), in the canagliflozin versus the glimepiride group (P =.0001). There were no differences in the change in the estimated glomerular filtration rate category between groups. Insulin level, homeostatic model assessment of β‐cell function, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance and estimated plasma volume were decreased at 24 weeks in the regression subclass but not in the progression subclass, suggesting that regression of proteinuria is associated with the declines in these values in the canagliflozin group. Higher insulin level at baseline was solely associated with proteinuria regression in the multivariate logistic regression model (baseline insulin, as per a 1‐mlU/L increase, odds ratio 1.24 [1.05‐1.47], P =.011). Conclusions: In patients with T2DM and CHF, regression of proteinuria with canagliflozin treatment was associated with the pretreatment insulin level. These results may provide clinicians with novel mechanistic insights into the beneficial effects of canagliflozin on renal outcomes and may warrant discussion for selecting preferred patient profiles, including pretreatment insulin levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To assess the impact of the sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibitor empagliflozin (25 mg once‐daily), dietary energy restriction, or both combined, on circulating appetite‐regulatory peptides in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and overweight or obesity. Materials and Methods: In a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial, 68 adults (aged 30‐75 years) with T2D (drug naïve or on metformin monotherapy; HbA1c 6.0%‐10.0% [42‐86 mmol/mol]) and body mass index of 25 kg/m2 or higher were randomized to (a) placebo only, (b) placebo plus diet, (c) empagliflozin only or (d) empagliflozin plus diet for 24 weeks. Dietary energy restriction matched the estimated energy deficit elicited by SGLT2 inhibitor therapy through urinary glucose excretion (~360 kcal/day). The primary outcome was change in postprandial circulating total peptide‐YY (PYY) during a 3‐hour mixed‐meal tolerance test from baseline to 24 weeks. Postprandial total glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1), acylated ghrelin and subjective appetite perceptions formed secondary outcomes, along with other key components of energy balance. Results: The mean weight loss in each group at 24 weeks was 0.44, 1.91, 2.22 and 5.74 kg, respectively. The change from baseline to 24 weeks in postprandial total PYY was similar between experimental groups and placebo only (mean difference [95% CI]: −8.6 [−28.6 to 11.4], 13.4 [−6.1 to 33.0] and 1.0 [−18.0 to 19.9] pg/ml in placebo‐plus diet, empagliflozin‐only and empagliflozin‐plus‐diet groups, respectively [all P ≥.18]). Similarly, there was no consistent pattern of difference between groups for postprandial total GLP‐1, acylated ghrelin and subjective appetite perceptions. Conclusions: In people with T2D and overweight or obesity, changes in postprandial appetite‐regulatory gut peptides may not underpin the less than predicted weight loss observed with empagliflozin therapy. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02798744, www.ClinicalTrials.gov; 2015‐001594‐40, www.EudraCT.ema.europa.eu; ISRCTN82062639, www.ISRCTN.org. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at increased risk for hospital admissions, and acute hospitalizations are associated with a worse prognosis. However, outcomes related to all‐cause hospital admissions (ACHAs) were often overlooked in trials that demonstrated the cardiovascular and kidney benefits of sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1RAs). This review includes a contemporary literature summary of emerging data regarding the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP‐1RAs on ACHAs. The role of SGLT2 inhibitors in preventing ACHAs was shown in exploratory investigations of several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and was further supported by real‐world evidence (RWE). However, the association between GLP‐1RA use and lower ACHA risk was mainly shown through RWE, with minimal available RCT data. We also discuss the advantages and challenges of studying ACHAs. Finally, we propose an easily memorized ("ABCDE" acronym) clinical approach to evaluating T2D status and treatment in admitted patients, as they transition from hospital to community care. This systematic approach may assist clinicians in recognizing possible pitfalls in T2D management, thereby preventing subsequent hospitalizations and improving patient prognoses. While acute admission can sometimes be perceived as a management failure, it should also be viewed as an opportunity to take action to prevent the next hospitalization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To assess the prevalence of elevated liver enzymes and associated diabetes‐related comorbidities in type 2 diabetes (T2D). Subjects and Methods: Between 2010 and 2019, 281 245 patients with T2D (aged 18‐75 years) from 501 Diabetes Prospective Follow‐up (DPV) centres were evaluated, resulting in analysis of 51 645 patients with complete data on demographics and liver enzymes. Results: Elevated liver enzymes were found in 40.2% of all patients. However, only 8.6% of these patients had International Classification of Diseases‐10 codes for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and/or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Adjusted for age, sex, diabetes duration, body mass index and glycated haemoglobin, a higher prevalence of arterial hypertension (P < 0.0001), dyslipidaemia (P < 0.0001), peripheral artery disease (P = 0.0029), myocardial infarction (P = 0.0003), coronary artery disease (P = 0.0001), microalbuminuria (P < 0.0001) and chronic kidney disease (P < 0.0001) was seen in patients with elevated versus normal liver enzymes. The prevalence of elevated liver enzymes was lowest in patients receiving sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibitors or a combination of SGLT2 inhibitors and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists. Conclusion: Elevated liver enzymes are common in patients with T2D and clearly correlate with a higher prevalence of clinically relevant comorbidities. Assessing liver enzymes should be standard clinical routine in T2D due to a possible predictive role for comorbidities and complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To assess the efficacy and safety of sotagliflozin, a dual inhibitor of sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐1 and ‐2, in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and stage 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD4). Materials and Methods: This 52‐week, phase 3, randomized (1:1:1), placebo‐controlled trial evaluated sotagliflozin 200 mg and sotagliflozin 400 mg once daily in 277 patients with T2D and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 15 to 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. The primary endpoint was glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction with sotagliflozin 400 mg versus placebo at 26 weeks. A hierarchical statistical testing approach was used. Results: The baseline mean HbA1c was 65 ± 12 mmol/mol (8.1% ± 1.1%), systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 144 ± 15 mmHg, and eGFR was 24 ± 4 mL/min/1.73m2. Placebo‐adjusted changes with sotagliflozin 400 mg were –3 mmol/mol (−0.3%; 95% confidence interval –7 to 0.6 [−0.6 to 0.05]; P = 0.096) and –8 mmol/mol (−0.7%; –13 to –3 [−1.2 to −0.2]; P = 0.003) in HbA1c at Weeks 26 and 52, respectively, −1.5 kg (−3.0 to −0.1) in body weight at Week 26, −5.4 mmHg (−9.4 to −1.3) in SBP at Week 12, and −0.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 (−2.1 to 1.6; P = 0.776) in eGFR at Week 52. Over 52 weeks, 11.8%, 5.4% and 3.3% of patients receiving placebo and sotagliflozin 200 and 400 mg, respectively, required rescue therapy for hyperglycaemia. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 82.8%, 86.2% and 81.1% of patients and serious cardiovascular AEs occurred in 12.9%, 3.2% and 4.4% of patients in the placebo and sotagliflozin 200 and 400 mg groups, respectively. Conclusions: After 26 weeks, HbA1c reductions with sotagliflozin were not statistically significant versus placebo in adults with T2D and CKD4. The 52‐week safety profile was consistent with results of the SCORED outcomes trial (NCT03242018). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To investigate the risk of diabetic macular oedema (DMO) associated with the use of sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study by analysing a large multi‐institutional electronic medical records database in Taiwan. We included adult patients with T2DM without DMO newly receiving either SGLT2 inhibitors or glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1RAs) during the period 2016 to 2018. We used propensity scores with inverse probability of treatment weighting to generate comparable groups. The study outcome was incident DMO, determined by clinical diagnosis during outpatient visits or admissions. We followed patients from the index date to either DMO occurrence, last clinical visit, patient death, or December 31, 2020. We performed Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk of DMO. Results: We included 9986 new users of SGLT2 inhibitors (mean [SD] age 59.6 (12.1) years, median [interquartile range {IQR}] glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] 70 (61‐81)mmol/mol, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] 89.1 [71.4‐108.7] mL/min/1.73 m2 and urine albumin‐creatinine ratio [UACR] 26.1 [9.7‐117.6] mg/g) and 1067 new users of GLP‐1RAs (mean [SD] age 58.4 (41.5) years, median [IQR] HbA1c 73 [64‐84] mmol/mol, eGFR 91.6 [68.6‐114.0] mL/min/1.73 m2 and UACR 37.6 [11.1‐153.2] mg/g) with similar baseline characteristics. Lower DMO risks were observed among patients newly receiving SGLT2 inhibitors (7.9/1000 person‐years), compared to those receiving GLP‐1RAs (10.7/1000 person‐years) with an HR of 0.75 (95% CI 0.64‐0.88). Conclusions: Our findings suggest use of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with lower risk of DMO in T2DM patients in clinical practice, compared to use of GLP‐1RAs. Future studies are necessary to confirm this observation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To evaluate the effects of separate and combined use of the sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibitor dapagliflozin and the glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist (GLP‐1RA) exenatide on measures of kidney function. Methods: In this prespecified secondary analysis of the DECREASE trial, we enrolled 66 obese patients with type 2 diabetes in a 16‐week randomized double‐blind placebo‐controlled clinical trial to investigate the effects of dapagliflozin and exenatide twice daily, alone or in combination, versus placebo on 24‐hour urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (UACR), creatinine and cystatin C‐estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and kidney injury molecule‐1:creatinine ratio (KIM‐1:Cr). Results: At week 16, the mean UACR change from baseline was −39.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] −58.6, −11.9; P = 0.001) in the combined exenatide‐dapagliflozin group, −18.1% (95% CI −43.1, 18.0; P = 0.278) in the dapagliflozin group, −15.6% (95% CI −41.4, 21.6; P = 0.357) in the exenatide group and − 11.0% (95% CI −39.8, 31.5; P = 0.552) in the placebo group. Compared to placebo, UACR difference at week 16 in the exenatide‐dapagliflozin group was −32.2% (95% CI −60.7, 16.9; P = 0.159). Effects were similar in 37 participants who were using angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers at baseline. Compared to placebo, in the exenatide‐dapagliflozin group, an acute dip in estimated GFR was observed with creatinine‐estimated GFR (−4.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 [95% CI −9.3, 1.2]; P = 0.129) and cystatin C‐estimated GFR (−10.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 [95% CI −14.9, −5.8]; P < 0.001). The mean KIM‐1:Cr difference in the combined treatment arm versus placebo was −43.8% (95% CI −73.5, 18.9; P = 0.129). Conclusion: This prespecified secondary analysis suggests that combined therapy with exenatide and dapagliflozin may have synergistic effects on markers of kidney function compared to either therapy alone or placebo in obese patients with type 2 diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present meta‐analysis is aimed at assessing the effects of sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on all‐cause mortality and differences across different trials and molecules of the class. We included all randomized clinical trials with a duration of treatment longer than 52 weeks, enrolling at least 100 patients in each arm, and comparing an SGLT2 inhibitor with any comparator or placebo. Out of 139, 235 and 145 items identified, 21 trials were selected, enrolling 39 593 and 30 771 patients in SGLT2 inhibitor and comparator arms, respectively, with a median duration of 104 weeks, and reporting 2474 and 2298 deaths for SGLT2 inhibitors and comparators, respectively. No relevant heterogeneity was found (I2 = 17%). Treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with a significant reduction in all‐cause mortality (MH‐OR [95% CI] 0.86 [0.81, 0.91] P <.00001). Meta‐regression analyses found a significant direct association of treatment effect only with the proportion of Asian subjects enrolled, and an inverse correlation with the proportion of Caucasian patients. In conclusion, SGLT2 inhibitors reduce all‐cause mortality in randomized controlled trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) characteristics, and tolerability of janagliflozin, a novel sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitor, in Chinese people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Materials and methods: In this study, 36 people with T2DM were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive janagliflozin 25 mg, janagliflozin 50 mg, dapagliflozin 10 mg or placebo. Participants received a single dose on day 1, and were treated once daily from day 4 to day 17. Results: Following oral administration, janagliflozin was rapidly absorbed, reaching Cmax at 2 hours. The mean half‐life (t1/2) at steady state was approximately 21 to 23 hours. There was no significant accumulation with multiple doses (accumulation factor < 2). In participants treated with janagliflozin 25 mg, janagliflozin 50 mg, dapagliflozin 10 mg or placebo, change in mean 24‐hour urinary glucose excretion from baseline was 92.35, 94.17, 87.61 and 6.26 g after multiple doses, and change in mean fasting plasma glucose level from baseline to day 17 was −2.18, −2.66, −2.79 and 1.70%, respectively. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate with no deaths, serious AEs, or discontinuations due to AEs. Conclusions: Single and multiple oral administration (14 days) of janagliflozin 25 mg and 50 mg exhibited favourable PK, PD and tolerability profiles in Chinese people with T2DM, which were comparable to those of dapagliflozin 10 mg. Janagliflozin 25 mg and 50 mg are recommended for further clinical investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To perform post‐hoc analyses of the EMPA‐REG OUTCOME trial examining the degree to which empagliflozin‐induced changes in conventional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors might explain the observed CV benefits. Materials and methods: We estimated 3‐year EMPA‐REG OUTCOME CV event rates using a type 2 diabetes‐specific clinical outcomes simulation model applied to annual patient‐level data. Variables included were atrial fibrillation, smoking, albuminuria, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, glycated haemoglobin, heart rate, white cell count, haemoglobin, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and histories of ischaemic heart disease, heart failure, amputation, blindness, renal failure, stroke, myocardial infarction or diabetic ulcer. Multiple simulations were performed for each participant to minimize uncertainty and optimize confidence interval precision around CV risk point estimates. Observed and simulated cardiovascular relative risk reductions were compared. Results: Model‐predicted relative risk reductions were smaller than those observed in the trial, with empagliflozin‐associated changes in conventional CV risk factor values appearing to explain only 12% of the observed relative risk reduction for all‐cause death (4% of 32%), 7% for CV death (3% of 39%) and 15% for heart failure (4% of 29%). Conclusions: Empagliflozin‐associated changes in conventional CV risk factors in EMPA‐REG OUTCOME appear to explain only a small proportion of the CV and all‐cause death reductions observed. Alternative risk‐reduction mechanisms need to be explored to determine if the observed CV risk changes can be explained by other factors, or possibly by a direct drug‐specific effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the past decade, many cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOT) on the efficacy and safety of glucose‐lowering agents have been completed. Amongst newer agents available for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have garnered much attention in contemporary clinical practice due to observed benefits on cardiovascular and kidney outcomes among patients with T2DM, as reported in large randomized controlled trials (RCT). These findings are reflected in the updated clinical guidelines of several major professional societies. Herein, we briefly review the mechanism of action of SGLT2 inhibitors and their pleiotropic effects, summarize key findings and limitations of initial CVOTs, then discuss three major kidney disease‐focused outcome trials, including the Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes and Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation (CREDENCE) trial as well as two ongoing RCTs: Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure‐chronic kidney disease and EMPA‐KIDNEY. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To develop a quantitative drug‐disease systems model to investigate the paradox that sodium‐glucose co‐transporter (SGLT)2 is responsible for >80% of proximal tubule glucose reabsorption, yet SGLT2 inhibitor treatment results in only 30% to 50% less reabsorption in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Materials and methods: A physiologically based four‐compartment model of renal glucose filtration, reabsorption and excretion via SGLT1 and SGLT2 was developed as a system of ordinary differential equations using R/IQRtools. SGLT2 inhibitor pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were estimated from published concentration‐time profiles in plasma and urine and from urinary glucose excretion (UGE) in healthy people and people with T2DM. Results: The final model showed that higher renal glucose reabsorption in people with T2DM versus healthy people was associated with 54% and 28% greater transporter capacity for SGLT1 and SGLT2, respectively. Additionally, the analysis showed that UGE is highly dependent on mean plasma glucose and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and that their consideration is critical for interpreting clinical UGE findings. Conclusions: Quantitative drug‐disease system modelling revealed mechanistic differences in renal glucose reabsorption and UGE between healthy people and those with T2DM, and clearly showed that SGLT2 inhibition significantly increased glucose available to SGLT1 downstream in the tubule. Importantly, we found that the findings of lower than expected UGE with SGLT2 inhibition are explained by the shift to SGLT1, which recovered additional glucose (~30% of total). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The use of sodium glucose co‐transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been limited, primarily because glycaemic efficacy is dependent on kidney function. We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with T2DM and CKD, defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Materials and methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library until 7 August 2018 and websites of the US, European and Japanese regulatory authorities until 27 July 2018 for data from randomized controlled trials of SGLT2 inhibitors that included reporting of effects on biomarkers, cardiovascular, renal or safety outcomes in individuals with T2DM and CKD. Random effects models and inverse variance weighting were used to calculate relative risks with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Data were obtained from 27 studies with up to 7363 participants involved. In patients with T2DM and CKD, SGLT2 inhibitors lowered glycated haemoglobin (−0.29%; 95% CI, −0.39 to −0.19) as well as blood pressure, body weight and albuminuria. SGLT2 inhibition reduced the risk of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction or nonfatal stroke (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70‐0.94) and heart failure (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.48‐0.78), without a clear effect on all‐cause mortality (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.73‐1.01). These agents also attenuated the annual decline in eGFR slope (placebo‐subtracted difference of 1.35 mL/1.73 m2/y; 95% CI, 0.78‐1.93) and reduced the risk of the composite renal outcome (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53‐0.95). There was no evidence of additional risks with SGLT2 inhibition in CKD beyond those already known for the class, although heterogeneity was observed across individual agents for some safety outcomes. Conclusion: Currently available data suggest that, despite only modest reductions in glycated haemoglobin, SGLT2 inhibitors reduce the risk of cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with T2DM and CKD, without clear evidence of additional safety concerns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Enrollment criteria vary substantially among cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) of sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 inhibitors (SGLT‐2is), which impacts the relationship between a trial population and the general type 2 diabetes (T2D) population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the representativeness of four SGLT‐2i CVOTs of a general T2D population. Methods: T2D patients from Germany, The Netherlands, Norway and Sweden were included in the study. Given the available data per country, key inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined by diagnoses, procedures and drug treatments to facilitate comparability among countries. Representativeness was determined by dividing the number of patients fulfilling the key enrolment criteria of each CVOT (CANVAS, DECLARE‐TIMI 58, EMPA‐REG OUTCOME, VERTIS‐CV) by the total T2D population. Results: In 2015, a total T2D population of 803 836 patients was identified in Germany (n = 239 485), in The Netherlands (n = 36 213), in Norway (n = 149 782) and in Sweden (n = 378 356). These populations showed a 25% to 44% cardiovascular (CV) disease baseline prevalence and high CV‐preventive drug use (>80%). The general T2D population had less prevalent CV disease and patients were slightly older than those included in the CVOTs. The DECLARE‐TIMI 58 trial had the highest representativeness, 59% compared to the general T2D population, and this representativeness was almost 2‐, 3‐ and 4‐fold higher compared to the CANVAS (34%), EMPA‐REG OUTCOME (21%) and VERTIS‐CV (17%) trials, respectively. Conclusions: In large T2D populations within Europe, consistent patterns of representativeness of CVOTs were found when applying the main enrolment criteria. The DECLARE‐TMI 58 trial had the highest representativeness, indicating that it included and examined patients who are most representative of the general T2D patients in the studied countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

New‐onset atrial fibrillation (NAF) is increased in the type 2 diabetic patient because of the presence of the metaboli syndrome and increased sympathetic activity. This results in inflammation, endothelial dysfunction and myocardial steatosis which, in turn, lead to atrial fibrosis and dilatation. The end result is the development of structural and electrical atrial remodeling. Drugs that lower insulin resistance, particularly pioglitazone, decrease the incidence of NAF while drugs that, through hypoglycaemia, stimulate the sympathetic nervous system, insulin and secretagogues, increase the incidence of NAF. Currently there is no evidence that GLP‐1 agonists, SGLT2 inhibitors and DPP‐4 inhibitors either accelerate or decelerate the development of NAF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The effects of empagliflozin on cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are unknown. In this pilot study we determined the effects of empagliflozin 10 mg/d for 4 weeks on peak oxygen consumption (VO2) in 15 patients with T2DM and HFrEF. As an exploratory analysis, we assessed whether there was an interaction of the effects of empagliflozin on peak VO2 of loop diuretics. Empagliflozin reduced body weight (−1.7 kg; P = .031), but did not change peak VO2 (from 14.5 mL kg−1 min−1 [12.6‐17.8] to 15.8 [12.5‐17.4] mL kg−1 min−1; P = .95). However, patients using loop diuretics (N = 9) demonstrated an improvement, whereas those without loop diuretics (N = 6) experienced a decrease in peak VO2 (+0.9 [0.1‐1.4] vs −0.9 [−2.1 to −0.3] mL kg−1 min−1; P = .001), and peak VO2 changes correlated with the baseline daily dose of diuretics (R = +0.83; P < .001). Empagliflozin did not improve peak VO2 in patients with T2DM and HFrEF. However, as a result of exploratory analysis, patients concomitantly treated with loop diuretics experienced a significant improvement in peak VO2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To determine, using published general practice‐level data, how differences in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) prescribing patterns relate to glycaemic target achievement levels. Methods: Multiple linear regression modelling was used to link practice characteristics and defined daily dose (DDD) of different classes of medication in 2015/2016 and changes between that year and the year 2014/2015 in medication to proportion of patients achieving target glycaemic control (glycated haemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] ≤58 mmol/mol [7.5%]) and proportion of patients at high glycaemic risk (HbA1c >86 mmol/mol [10.0%]) for practices in the National Diabetes Audit with >100 people with T2DM on their register. Results: Overall, HbA1c outcomes were not different between the years studied. Although, in percentage terms, most practices increased their use of sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (96%), dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4) inhibitors (76%) and glucagon‐like peptide 1 (GLP‐1) analogues (53%), there was wide variation in the use of older and newer therapies. For example, 12% of practices used >200% of the national average for some newer agents. In cross‐sectional analysis, greater prescribing of metformin and analogue insulin were associated with a higher proportion of patients achieving HbA1c ≤58 mmol/mol; the use of SGLT2 inhibitors and metformin was associated with a reduced proportion of patients with HbA1c >86 mol/mol; otherwise associations for sulphonylureas, GLP‐1 analogues, SGLT2 inhibitors and DPP‐4 inhibitors were neutral or negative. In year‐on‐year analysis there was ongoing deterioration in glycaemic control, which was offset to some extent by increased use of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP‐1 analogues, which were associated with a greater proportion of patients achieving HbA1c levels ≤58 mmol/mol and a smaller proportion of patients with HbA1c levels >86 mmol/mol. SGLT2 inhibitor prescribing was associated with significantly greater improvements than those found for GLP‐1 analogues. Conclusion: Greater use of newer agents was associated with improvement in glycaemic outcomes but was not sufficient to compensate for the prevailing decline. This may reflect wide variability in the prescribing of newer agents. We found that SGLT inhibitors may be superior to other oral agents in relation to HbA1c outcome. Serious consideration should be given to their use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To describe the baseline characteristics of participants randomized in the Dapagliflozin Effect on CardiovascuLAR Events (DECLARE‐TIMI 58) trial, the pivotal study conducted to assess cardiovascular (CV) outcomes with dapagliflozin. Methods: The DECLARE‐TIMI 58 trial will analyse 17 160 patients with type 2 diabetes randomized to treatment with dapagliflozin (10 mg/d) or matching placebo. We analysed their baseline characteristics. Results: The participants’ mean ± SD age was 63.8 ± 6.8 years, 62.6% were male, and their mean ± SD diabetes duration was 11.8 ± 7.8 years, glycated haemoglobin 8.3% ± 1.2% (67 mmol/mol ± 9.7 mmol/mol) and body mass index 32.1 ± 6.0 kg/m2. Randomization included 6971 (40.6%) patients with atherosclerotic CV disease (CVD), and 10 189 (59.4%) patients with multiple risk factors (MRF) for CVD (defined as men age ≥ 55 years or women ≥60 years, with at least one of dyslipidaemia, hypertension or smoking). Patients with CVD compared with patients with MRF were younger (62.5 ± 8.1 vs 64.7 ± 5.6 years), more frequently male (72.1% vs 56.1%), less often used metformin (74.6% vs 81.2%), more often used insulin (44.2% vs 36.4%), and more frequently used statins, aspirin, clopidogrel and β‐blockers (82.2%, 71.1%, 24.7% and 66.6% vs 63.7%, 39.1%, 1.5% and 32.3%, respectively). Conclusion: The DECLARE‐TIMI 58 trial is expected to provide conclusive data on the effect of treatment with dapagliflozin in addition to standard of care, on CV outcomes in a broad patient population with type 2 diabetes and CVD or MRF for CVD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]