Search

Background and Aims: In this study, we aimed to refer eligible (patients with stable blood sugar and without any history of cardiovascular events or proliferative retinopathy) and willing persons with diabetes (PwDs) to primary healthcare centers (PHCs) from tertiary care and to compare the care indicators., Methods: This before-after interventional study was conducted among PwDs aged ≥18 years at a tertiary care hospital in South India. Care indicators (regularity to the clinic, waiting time, and blood sugar control status) were assessed before down referral and after three months of follow-ups at PHCs., Results: Of 204 PwDs referred to PHCs. Among them, 88% (n = 180) registered at PHCs for care and 46% (n = 94, 95% CI 39.1-53.2%) were lost to follow-ups at PHCs. The main reason for loss to follow-ups was the unavailability of medicines at PHCs(n = 41, 44%). Among those who were on regular follow-ups at PHCs, there was no significant difference in fasting blood glucose (FBG) control status compared to tertiary (52%-64.6%, p = 0.083). However, there was a significant improvement in the regularity of clinic visits (75% vs. 100%, p < 0.001), consultation waiting time (90 vs. 60 min, p = 0.028), and waiting time at pharmacy queues (120 vs. 30 min, p < 0.001) between tertiary care and PHCs. However, among those registered at PHCs, only 40.6% (n = 73, 95% CI 33.3-48.1) were willing to continue care at PHCs for their diabetes management., Conclusion: Primary care was better than tertiary care in terms of PwD's regularity of clinic visits and waiting time for care., (Copyright © 2022 Research Trust of DiabetesIndia (DiabetesIndia) and National Diabetes Obesity and Cholesterol Foundation (N-DOC). Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown measures to contain it have affected health care services globally. This study aims to assess the effect and urban-rural differences of COVID19 pandemic on diabetes care., Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among persons with diabetes (PWDs) registered for care at a diabetes clinic of a tertiary care center in Southern India. We collected following information by telephonic interviews: physician consultations, access to diabetes medications and blood sugar tests, use of telemedicine services, out of pocket expenditure and psychological morbidity., Results: A total of 350 PWDs were interviewed. Majority were male (78%) and from rural areas (79%). One fourth (24%) met any physician for diabetes care at least once during lockdown. PWDs from rural areas mainly consulted a physician in a private clinic (55%) compared to urban areas (26%). Two third (65%) availed medications from private medical shops. Almost half (46%) got their blood sugar tested during and majority of them (81%) reported unsatisfactory glycemic control. Only few (5%) was aware and three utilized telemedicine services. Almost all (99%) spent money (US $ 8.3) for diabetes care. One third (33%) had moderate or high psychological distress., Conclusions: Majority of PWDs did not consult a physician during lockdown. Cost of care was high. Measures to improve utilisation of telemedicine services and peripheral health facilities are needed., (Copyright © 2020 Diabetes India. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)