Search

Objective: To investigate the glycemic balance before, during and after the 2016 Paris Marathon using a real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) system in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus in a prospective single-center observational study., Methods: Inclusion criteria were as follows: type 1 diabetes mellitus; age ≥18 years; HbA1c < 9%. Participants performed two 2h-preparatory races (PR) before the Marathon and were monitored with RT-CGM 24h before, during and 72h after each race. Hypoglycemic events were prevented via carbohydrate intake / insulin dose adjustments. The primary outcome was area under the curve (AUC) < 70 and > 200 mg/dl and percentage of time spent in euglycemia, hypoglycemia, and hyperglycemia during the races., Results: Twelve patients (2F/10M; median HbA1c=6.8%) were included and completed the study. Median AUC < 70 and time spent in hypoglycemia (< 70 mg/dl) during the PRs and Marathon were equal to 0. However, no hypoglycemic episodes occurred during Marathon, while two patients experienced hypoglycemia during PR1 and PR2. There was a significant increase in AUC > 200 mg/dl during races between PR2 and Marathon (P = 0.009) although the median time spent > 200mg/dl was not statistically different in Marathon versus PR2 (48.4% versus 18.4%; P = 0.09). Median time spent in euglycemia (70-200 mg/dl) was lower in Marathon versus PR2 (51.6 versus 58%; P = 0.03)., Conclusion: Our study proposes a medical support protocol for extreme endurance physical activity in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Our results suggest that RT-CGM, coupled with adjustments in carbohydrate intake and insulin doses, appears to be effective to prevent hypoglycemia during and after exercise., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Women who have had gestational diabetes mellitus must be monitored in the immediate postpartum period to ensure that blood glucose levels return to normal without further treatment. In the few studies performed specifically in these women, those that breastfed did not have a different metabolic profile, at least during the period of breastfeeding; the metabolic profiles of children born to women that had gestational diabetes and that breastfed also did not differ from those that were not breastfed. The choice of contraception must mainly take into consideration the associated risk factors. The studies, even if few have specifically focused on women with a history of gestational diabetes, have not demonstrated a significant disturbance of glucose metabolism while using hormonal contraception, whether combined oral oestrogen/progestogen or progestogen-only contraception. However, the presence of obesity, hypertension, or dyslipidaemia must direct the choice of contraception towards one without cardiovascular consequences. In these cases, the intrauterine device is an excellent choice.

Aim and Methods: The present study compared the clinical and metabolic characteristics of latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) with type 2 diabetes, as well as the residual beta-cell function and progression to insulin treatment, over a 2-year follow-up period, of antibody (Ab)-positive and Ab-negative patients who achieved tight glycaemic control (HbA(1c) 7.0+/-0.8% and 6.5+/-0.9%, respectively, at the time of entry into the study)., Results: Glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (GADA) and/or islet cell antibodies (ICA) were detected in 10% of patients presenting with non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Around half of Ab-positive patients required insulin treatment during the follow-up. Ab-positive patients displayed lower stimulated C-peptide levels both at entry and during the follow-up compared with Ab-negative patients, although no significant decline in C-peptide levels was observed in either subgroup over two years. Nevertheless, Ab-positive patients progressed more frequently to insulin treatment, and stimulated C-peptide tended to decrease in LADA patients who subsequently required insulin, whereas it remained stable in those who were non-insulin-dependent. In those who progressed, the trend towards C-peptide decline persisted even after starting insulin treatment., Conclusion: LADA patients demonstrate lower residual beta-cell function than do type 2 diabetes patients. However, those who achieve tight metabolic control do not present with a rapid decline in beta-cell function. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal treatment strategy in such patients., (Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Self monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in type 2 diabetes is a topic of current interest (imbalance between increased health-care costs and improvement in compliance with treatment and diet). An open label randomized prospective study was designed to compare changes in metabolic control over 6 months in patients managed with usual recommendations alone (conventional assessment group) or combined with SMBG., Research Design and Methods: Patients not treated with insulin or previously self monitored, 40 to 75 years of age, with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes > 1 year and standardized HbA(1c) level > =7.5 and< =11% were randomized to either a control group or SMBG group. They were followed up every 6 weeks over 24 weeks. Patients in the SMBG group were given the same device (Ascensia Esprit Discmeter, Bayer) and were required to perform at least 6 capillary assays a week (3 different days of the week, including weekend). Management of patients was standardized, including drugs, diet and physical activity. The primary efficacy criterion was change in HbA(1c) level in Intent To Treat (ITT) patients. Assays were performed at baseline, at 3 and 6 months using the calibrated DCA 2000(R) device (Bayer)., Results: Two hundred sixty five general practitioners randomized 988 patients (ITT Population), but 689 patients were evaluable for the primary criterion. At the endpoint, HbA(1c) was lower in the SMBG group (8.1 +/- 1.6%) than in the conventional treatment group (8.4 +/- 1.4%, P=0.012). The change in HbA(1c) levels between baseline and endpoint was classified into two classes: improvement if a change > 0.5% occurred, stability or worsening in case of a change< =0.5%; 57.1% of patients in the SMBG group vs 46.8% in the control group had an improvement in HbA(1c) level (P=0.007) after 3 months. A steady state was reached during the last 3 months. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed and identified factors predictive of improvement in HbA(1c) levels: HbA(1c) at baseline: odd ratio (OR)=1.749 (P<0.001), SMBG group (reference value: SMBG group): OR=0.665 (P=0.015), duration of diabetes: OR=0.953 (P=0.001) and BMI: OR=0.962 (P=0.039)., Conclusions: This study is the first multicenter, controlled, prospective trial conducted on a large number of patients demonstrating that SMBG was statistically associated with a better quality of metabolic control than usual traditional recommendations alone in type 2 diabetes.