4 results on '"Whyte MB"'
Search Results
2. Effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors on plasma potassium: A meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Charlwood C, Chudasama J, Darling AL, Logan Ellis H, and Whyte MB
- Subjects
- Humans, Glucose therapeutic use, Hypoglycemic Agents therapeutic use, Potassium, Sodium therapeutic use, Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 therapeutic use, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 drug therapy, Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors therapeutic use
- Abstract
Aims: There has been uncertainty whether SGLT2 inhibition predisposes to hyperkalaemia or is protective from it. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to assess effects of SGLT2 inhibition on serum-potassium and hyperkalaemia-events in T2DM., Methods: MEDLINE and PubMed databases were searched for 'hyperkalaemia' or 'potassium', with SGLT2 inhibitors in T2DM, to 31st December 2020. Randomised controlled trials, with potassium or hyperkalaemia as primary or secondary outcomes, were included. Cochran's Q test and I
2 statistic assessed statistical heterogeneity. Meta-analyses were performed using Cochrane-RevMan with two outcomes: i) Odds ratio (OR) of hyperkalaemia-events between SGLT2 inhibitor and placebo (fixed-effects), ii) Mean difference (MD) in change from baseline potassium between SGLT2 inhibitor and placebo (random-effects)., Results: Of 1724 identified publications, nine were included in the meta-analysis (n = 3 hyperkalaemia event; n = 5 serum-potassium; n = 1 reported both outcomes). Pooled OR for hyperkalaemia-events for SGLT2 inhibitor vs placebo was 0.72 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61 to 0.85, P < 0.001], I2 of 9%. The pooled MD in serum-potassium concentration with SGLT2 inhibitor vs placebo was -0.04 mmol/L [95% CI -0.08 to 0.00 mmol/L; P = 0.04], I2 of 89%., Conclusions: Use of SGLT2 inhibitors in T2DM reduced odds of inducing hyperkalaemia but had a minimal effect of lowering serum potassium., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: ‘MBW holds investigator-led research grant with AstraZeneca and previous funding from Eli Lilly. Speaker and Consultancy fees from MSD, Boehringer and AstraZeneca.’, (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Diabetic retinopathy in newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes mellitus: Prevalence and predictors of progression; a national primary network study.
- Author
-
Shah S, Feher M, McGovern A, Sherlock J, Whyte MB, Munro N, Hinton W, Gatenby P, and de Lusignan S
- Subjects
- Aged, Cohort Studies, Disease Progression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prevalence, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 complications, Diabetic Retinopathy epidemiology
- Abstract
Aims: To determine, inreal-world primary care settings, the prevalence of, and risk factors for, retinopathy atType 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosis and report cumulative incidence and progression of retinopathy seven years after diabetes diagnosis., Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of people with newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetesrecorded bythe Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre(between 2005 and 2009, n=11,399).Outcomes included; retinopathy prevalence atdiabetesdiagnosis (baseline) and cumulative incidence or progression of retinopathy at seven years. Retinopathy prevalence was compared with the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS-1998). Factors influencing retinopathy incidence and progression were analysed using logistic regression., Results: Baseline retinopathy prevalencewas 18% (n=2,048) versus 37% in UKPDS. At seven years, 11.6% (n=237) of those with baseline retinopathyhad progression of retinopathy. In those without baseline retinopathy, 46.4% (n=4,337/9,351) developed retinopathy by seven years. Retinopathy development (OR: 1.05 [95%CI: 1.02-1.07] per mmol/mol increase) and progression (OR: 1.05 [1.04-1.06]) at seven years was associated with higher HbA
1c atdiabetesdiagnosis. Obesity (OR: 0.88 [0.79-0.98]) and high socioeconomic status (OR: 0.63 [0.53-0.74]) were negatively associated with retinopathy development at seven years., Conclusions: Baseline retinopathy prevalence has declined since UKPDS. Additionally, HbA1c at diabetes diagnosis remains important for retinopathy development and progression., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. The contribution of diabetic micro-angiopathy to adverse outcomes in COVID-19.
- Author
-
Whyte MB, Vas P, Heiss C, and Feher MD
- Subjects
- Betacoronavirus isolation & purification, COVID-19, Coronavirus Infections blood, Coronavirus Infections therapy, Diabetic Angiopathies pathology, Ethnicity, Humans, Hyperglycemia pathology, Hyperglycemia virology, Pandemics, Pneumonia, Viral blood, Pneumonia, Viral therapy, SARS-CoV-2, Coronavirus Infections pathology, Diabetic Angiopathies virology, Pneumonia, Viral pathology
- Abstract
Increasing evidence points to endothelial cell dysfunction as a key pathophysiological factor in severe coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), manifested by platelet aggregation, microthrombi and altered vasomotor tone. This may be driven by direct endothelial cell entry by the virus, or indirectly by activated inflammatory cascade. Major risk groups identified for adverse outcomes in COVID-19 are diabetes, and those from the Black, Asian and ethnic minority (BAME) populations. Hyperglycaemia (expressed as glycated haemoglobin or mean hospital glucose) correlates with worse outcomes in COVID-19. It is not known whether hyperglycaemia is causative or is a surrogate marker - persistent hyperglycaemia is well known as an aetiological agent in microangiopathy. In this article, we propose that pre-existing endothelial dysfunction of microangiopathy, more commonly evident in diabetes and BAME groups, makes an individual vulnerable to the subsequent 'endothelitis' of COVID-19 infection., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.