1. Accuracy of Subcutaneous Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Adults: Improved Sensor Performance with Enhanced Calibrations
- Author
-
Rowan Burnstein, Karen Caldwell, Malgorzata E. Wilinska, Marianna Nodale, Hood Thabit, Janet M Allen, Mark L. Evans, Roman Hovorka, Shane W. English, Kavita Kumareswaran, Lalantha Leelarathna, and Ahmad Haidar
- Subjects
Blood Glucose ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Critical Illness ,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,Biosensing Techniques ,law.invention ,Endocrinology ,Randomized controlled trial ,Predictive Value of Tests ,law ,Diabetes mellitus ,Humans ,Medicine ,Prospective Studies ,Prospective cohort study ,Monitoring, Physiologic ,Glycated Hemoglobin ,business.industry ,Glucose Measurement ,Reproducibility of Results ,Original Articles ,medicine.disease ,Intensive care unit ,Surgery ,Intensive Care Units ,Medical Laboratory Technology ,Hyperglycemia ,Predictive value of tests ,Anesthesia ,Calibration ,Arterial blood ,Female ,business ,Body mass index - Abstract
Accurate real-time continuous glucose measurements may improve glucose control in the critical care unit. We evaluated the accuracy of the FreeStyle(®) Navigator(®) (Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, CA) subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device in critically ill adults using two methods of calibration.In a randomized trial, paired CGM and reference glucose (hourly arterial blood glucose [ABG]) were collected over a 48-h period from 24 adults with critical illness (mean±SD age, 60±14 years; mean±SD body mass index, 29.6±9.3 kg/m(2); mean±SD Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score, 12±4 [range, 6-19]) and hyperglycemia. In 12 subjects, the CGM device was calibrated at variable intervals of 1-6 h using ABG. In the other 12 subjects, the sensor was calibrated according to the manufacturer's instructions (1, 2, 10, and 24 h) using arterial blood and the built-in point-of-care glucometer.In total, 1,060 CGM-ABG pairs were analyzed over the glucose range from 4.3 to 18.8 mmol/L. Using enhanced calibration median (interquartile range) every 169 (122-213) min, the absolute relative deviation was lower (7.0% [3.5, 13.0] vs. 12.8% [6.3, 21.8], P0.001), and the percentage of points in the Clarke error grid Zone A was higher (87.8% vs. 70.2%).Accuracy of the Navigator CGM device during critical illness was comparable to that observed in non-critical care settings. Further significant improvements in accuracy may be obtained by frequent calibrations with ABG measurements.
- Published
- 2014