Search

Introduction: Preference for quality of life is important in deciding the treatment strategy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study aimed to assess the effect of omarigliptin on patients' psychological attitudes and responses compared with daily dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is) by measuring the burden of pharmacotherapy using the Diabetic Treatment Burden Questionnaire (DTBQ)., Methods: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were taking daily DPP-4is were enrolled and randomized to a group that switched to omarigliptin or a group that continued daily DPP4is and were monitored for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in the DTBQ score from baseline to week 12. The secondary endpoints included changes in blood test results, medication preferences and medication adherence., Results: The DTBQ total score significantly decreased from baseline to week 12 in both groups; however, no significant intergroup differences were observed. The DTBQ subscale, implementation and flexibility burden scores significantly decreased in the group that switched to omarigliptin, although no significant intergroup difference in the change was observed. DTBQ scores and medication preferences were associated with improvements in the DTBQ scores., Conclusion: Although this study failed to demonstrate the improvement of DTBQ total score by switching from daily DPP4is to omarigliptin compared with continuing the daily DPP4is, the DTBQ subscale score implementation and flexibility burden score were significantly improved only in the group that switched to omarigliptin, suggesting the possibility of switching from daily DPP4is to omarigliptin to decrease the patients' medication burden., Trial Registration: jRCTs031200437., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

In the original publication, second author's name was incorrectly published as Hiroki Shin. The correct name should read as 'Koki Shin'.

Introduction: To measure the burden of pharmacotherapy on patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), we developed the Diabetes Treatment Burden Questionnaire (DTBQ), a patient-administered questionnaire composed of 18 questions, and evaluated its reproducibility and validity., Methods: We enrolled 240 patients with T2DM under pharmacotherapy over 20 years of age at seven institutes in Japan. Their physicians filled out report forms on patient backgrounds, and the patients answered both the DTBQ and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ). For evaluation of reproducibility, 48 of the enrolled subjects completed a 2nd DTBQ at home after leaving the medical institutes., Results: Statistical analyses were performed for two sets of subjects, the validity analysis set (N = 236) and the reproducibility analysis set (N = 47). Factor analysis found a simple structure in the DTBQ item scores using a three-factor model with varimax rotation; the three subscales were designated as "implementation burden", "flexibility burden", and "blood glucose control burden". All intraclass correlation coefficients for the subscale scores were 0.8 or higher, indicating high reproducibility. Negative correlations were observed between the DTSQ satisfaction score and the DTBQ subscale scores. Moreover, as the dosing frequency of diabetic medicines increased, the DTBQ total score (total burden score) also became higher. Likewise, expected associations were observed between patient backgrounds and DTSQ scores., Conclusion: The DTBQ has adequate reproducibility and validity as a measurement scale for treatment burden on T2DM patients., Trial Registration: University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) 000026382., Funding: Eli Lilly Japan.