Search

Your search keyword '"Brunelle S"' showing total 4 results
Start Over Author "Brunelle S" Journal diagnostic and interventional imaging
4 results on '"Brunelle S"'

1. Five simultaneous artificial intelligence data challenges on ultrasound, CT, and MRI

Author

Lassau, N., Estienne, T., de Vomecourt, P., Azoulay, M., Cagnol, J., Garcia, G., Majer, M., Jehanno, E., Renard-Penna, R., Balleyguier, C., Bidault, F., Caramella, C., Jacques, T., Dubrulle, F., Behr, J., Poussange, N., Bocquet, J., Montagne, S., Cornelis, F., Faruch, M., Bresson, B., Brunelle, S., Jalaguier-Coudray, A., Amoretti, N., Blum, A., Paisant, A., Herreros, V., Rouviere, O., Si-Mohamed, S., Di Marco, L., Hauger, O., Garetier, M., Pigneur, F., Bergère, A., Cyteval, C., Fournier, L., Malhaire, C., Drape, J.-L., Poncelet, E., Bordonne, C., Cauliez, H., Budzik, J.-F., Boisserie, M., Willaume, T., Molière, S., Peyron Faure, N., Caius Giurca, S., Juhan, V., Caramella, T., Perrey, A., Desmots, F., Faivre-Pierre, M., Abitbol, M., Lotte, R., Istrati, D., Guenoun, D., Luciani, A., Zins, M., Meder, J.-F., and Cotten, A.

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. MRI restaging of rectal cancer: The RAC (Response-Anal canal-CRM) analysis joint consensus guidelines of the GRERCAR and GRECCAR groups.

Author

Nougaret S, Rousset P, Lambregts DMJ, Maas M, Gormly K, Lucidarme O, Brunelle S, Milot L, Arrivé L, Salut C, Pilleul F, Hordonneau C, Baudin G, Soyer P, Brun V, Laurent V, Savoye-Collet C, Petkovska I, Gerard JP, Cotte E, Rouanet P, Catalano O, Denost Q, Tan RB, Frulio N, and Hoeffel C

Subjects
Humans, Neoplasm Staging, Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods, Consensus, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Anal Canal, Rectal Neoplasms diagnostic imaging
Abstract

Purpose: To develop guidelines by international experts to standardize data acquisition, image interpretation, and reporting in rectal cancer restaging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)., Materials and Methods: Evidence-based data and experts' opinions were combined using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method to attain consensus guidelines. Experts provided recommendations for reporting template and protocol for data acquisition were collected; responses were analysed and classified as "RECOMMENDED" versus "NOT RECOMMENDED" (if ≥ 80% consensus among experts) or uncertain (if < 80% consensus among experts)., Results: Consensus regarding patient preparation, MRI sequences, staging and reporting was attained using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method. A consensus was reached for each reporting template item among the experts. Tailored MRI protocol and standardized report were proposed., Conclusion: These consensus recommendations should be used as a guide for rectal cancer restaging with MRI., Competing Interests: Disclosure of interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose in relation with this article., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. Structured and shared MRI staging lexicon and report of rectal cancer: A consensus proposal by the French Radiology Group (GRERCAR) and Surgical Group (GRECCAR) for rectal cancer.

Author

Nougaret S, Rousset P, Gormly K, Lucidarme O, Brunelle S, Milot L, Salut C, Pilleul F, Arrivé L, Hordonneau C, Baudin G, Soyer P, Brun V, Laurent V, Savoye-Collet C, Petkovska I, Gerard JP, Rullier E, Cotte E, Rouanet P, Beets-Tan RGH, Frulio N, and Hoeffel C

Subjects
Consensus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods, Neoplasm Staging, Radiology, Rectal Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Rectal Neoplasms pathology
Abstract

Purpose: To develop French guidelines by experts to standardize data acquisition, image interpretation, and reporting in rectal cancer staging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)., Materials and Methods: Evidence-based data and opinions of experts of GRERCAR (Groupe de REcherche en Radiologie sur le CAncer du Rectum [i.e., Rectal Cancer Imaging Research Group]) and GRECCAR (Groupe de REcherche en Chirurgie sur le CAncer du Rectum [i.e., Rectal Cancer Surgery Research Group]) were combined using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method to attain consensus guidelines. Experts scoring of reporting template and protocol for data acquisition were collected; responses were analyzed and classified as "Recommended" versus "Not recommended" (when ≥ 80% consensus among experts) or uncertain (when < 80% consensus among experts)., Results: Consensus regarding patient preparation, MRI sequences, staging and reporting was attained using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method. A consensus was reached for each reporting template item among the experts. Tailored MRI protocol and standardized report were proposed., Conclusion: These consensus recommendations should be used as a guide for rectal cancer staging with MRI., (Copyright © 2021 Société française de radiologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results