Search

Background The specificity and sensitivity of HEG1 for malignant mesothelioma (MM) is high. The use of BAP1/MTAP immunohistochemistry (IHC) is recommended to separate benign and malignant mesothelial proliferations. We determined how ancillary techniques can be used for the cytological diagnosis of MM with effusion. Methods Cell blocks from effusions from cases with MM, reactive mesothelial cells (RMCs), and carcinomas were analyzed by IHC with HEG1, BAP1, and MTAP and with homozygous deletion (HD) of CDKN2A by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Staining scores were calculated for IHC by adding the number of categories for the staining intensity and the staining extension. Results HEG1 was positive in all (41/41) MMs, but negative in carcinomas, except for ovarian carcinomas. Overall 76.9% (20/26) of RMCs and 28.6% (6/21) of ovarian carcinomas expressed HEG1. BAP1 loss was found in 71.1% of MMs, but none was found in RMCs. MTAP loss was found in 76.2% of MMs, but none was found in RMCs. 73.9% of MMs harbored HD of CDKN2A. There was concordance between loss of MTAP and HD of CDKN2A in 95% of MMs. Conclusion HEG1 is a good marker for mesothelial differentiation in effusion cytology. HD of CDKN2A is frequently observed in cell blocks from effusions of MMs, and MTAP IHC may act as a surrogate for HD of CDKN2A. Cell block analysis is recommended for effusions of unknown origins with the following methods: IHC with HEG1 and claudin 4 to validate the mesothelial origin, followed by BAP1 and MTAP IHC to confirm malignancy.

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a chronic autoimmune bullous disease characterized by the formation of suprabasal cleavage and acantholysis. As this disease almost always affects the oral mucosa, conventional cytological smears of oral lesions can be used for the initial diagnosis of PV. We report two cases of PV that were initially diagnosed based on cytological smears of an oral sample. As atypical squamous cells were present even in the liquid-based cytological (LBC) smears of the oral lesion in these two cases, this ultimately led to the misinterpretation of squamous cell carcinoma. These findings demonstrate that cytological mimicry of oral PV can occur in malignant cases when there is an absence of appropriate clinical information.

Because most of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients first present with pleural effusion, detection of mesothelioma cells on effusion smears is critical for early diagnosis. Recently, accumulating evidence indicating that the cytological diagnosis of MPM supported by ancillary techniques is as reliable as that based on histopathology has led to new guidelines for the cytopathologic diagnosis of MPM. Based on the guidelines, a combination of cytomorphological criteria and verification by ancillary techniques is required for the cytologic diagnosis of MPM. Detection of p16 homozygous deletion by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the most reliable ancillary technique for differentiating MPM from reactive mesothelial cells (RMC) because of its relatively high sensitivity and extremely high specificity. We showed that the p16 deletion status of MPM cells in pleural effusions reflected that of the underlying invasive MPM tissues, indicating the usefulness of p16 FISH in effusion smear cytology for MPM diagnosis. Thus, for differentiating MPM from RMC, we propose to perform p16 FISH as often as possible. A positive p16 homozygous deletion supports the diagnosis of MPM. However, a negative result does not rule out the possibility of MPM. In such cases, a morphological assessment is critical. Therefore, we analyzed the morphological characteristics of p16 deletion-positive mesothelioma cells using a combination of virtual microscopy and p16 FISH, and identified three morphological characteristics useful for the differentiation, including cell-in-cell engulfment with or without hump formation, multinucleate cells, and larger berry-like cell aggregates. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2016;44:774-780. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Background Mesothelioma patients often present with serosal effusions, which are ideal for cytopathological diagnoses. However, the morphological overlap between malignant and benign mesothelial proliferation can make a conclusive cytological diagnosis of mesothelioma elusive because immunohistochemical staining does not discriminate definitively between the two in this setting. p16 is deleted in up to 80% of pleural mesotheliomas. The aim of this study was to establish the correlation between the p16 deletion status of the cell block with that of its corresponding tumor using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis for individual patient tumors. Methods Twenty-two biopsies and 24 corresponding cell blocks, containing serosal effusions with atypical mesothelial cells from 22 patients with histologically confirmed pleural mesotheliomas, were analyzed with p16 FISH. Seventeen cell blocks consisting of serosal effusions with reactive mesothelial cells from nonmesothelioma cases were also analyzed. Combined immunofluorescence and FISH were also performed. Results Seventeen of the 22 mesothelioma patients (77.3%) showed homozygous deletions of p16 in the tumor tissue and in the atypical mesothelial cells from the cell blocks. p16 FISH followed by immunofluorescence with EMA was helpful towards identifying the mesothelioma cells in the cell blocks. Conclusion We confirmed that the p16 FISH results obtained from the cell blocks are as reliable as those from the tissue sections. Cell block analysis is recommended for patients with serosal effusions of unknown origins with the following methods: immunohistochemistry should be performed to validate the mesothelial origin, and p16 FISH should be performed to confirm malignancy. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2016;44:591-598. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Consistency in endometrial cytology is relatively poor. This can be partly attributed to generally accepted criteria based on cellular features. The cytological distinction between grade-1 adenocarcinoma and endometrial hyperplasia is more reliant on architectural features than cellular features. We examined statistical criteria based on cytoarchitecture for detecting grade-1 adenocarcinoma in endometrial cytology. Histologically, the study population consisted of 11 cases of grade-1 adenocarcinoma, 6 of atypical endometrial hyperplasia, 16 of endometrial hyperplasia without atypia, and 74 of a normal proliferative endometrium. In each case, all cellclumps were divided into five patterns (tubular; sheet; dilated and/or branched tubular; regular overlapping; atypical). The frequencies of each pattern were submitted to five-variate cluster analysis. The validity and reproducibility of cluster analysis were tested by canonical discriminant analysis and multigroup linear discriminant analysis, respectively. All 107 cases were classified into three groups, A (11), B (36), and C (60), by five-variate cluster analysis. In comparison with this classification and histopathologic diagnosis, group A corresponded to adenocarcinoma, and groups B and C correlated with non-carcinoma. Most cases of atypical endometrial hyperplasia were included in group B. These data suggest that statistical groupings based on cytoarchitecture are useful in the discrimination of grade-1 adenocarcinoma from endometrial hyperplasia and normal tissue.

Mesothelioma patients often present with serosal effusions, which are ideal for cytopathological diagnoses. However, the morphological overlap between malignant and benign mesothelial proliferation can make a conclusive cytological diagnosis of mesothelioma elusive because immunohistochemical staining does not discriminate definitively between the two in this setting. p16 is deleted in up to 80% of pleural mesotheliomas. The aim of this study was to establish the correlation between the p16 deletion status of the cell block with that of its corresponding tumor using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis for individual patient tumors.Twenty-two biopsies and 24 corresponding cell blocks, containing serosal effusions with atypical mesothelial cells from 22 patients with histologically confirmed pleural mesotheliomas, were analyzed with p16 FISH. Seventeen cell blocks consisting of serosal effusions with reactive mesothelial cells from nonmesothelioma cases were also analyzed. Combined immunofluorescence and FISH were also performed.Seventeen of the 22 mesothelioma patients (77.3%) showed homozygous deletions of p16 in the tumor tissue and in the atypical mesothelial cells from the cell blocks. p16 FISH followed by immunofluorescence with EMA was helpful towards identifying the mesothelioma cells in the cell blocks.We confirmed that the p16 FISH results obtained from the cell blocks are as reliable as those from the tissue sections. Cell block analysis is recommended for patients with serosal effusions of unknown origins with the following methods: immunohistochemistry should be performed to validate the mesothelial origin, and p16 FISH should be performed to confirm malignancy. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2016;44:591-598. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Because most of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients first present with pleural effusion, detection of mesothelioma cells on effusion smears is critical for early diagnosis. Recently, accumulating evidence indicating that the cytological diagnosis of MPM supported by ancillary techniques is as reliable as that based on histopathology has led to new guidelines for the cytopathologic diagnosis of MPM. Based on the guidelines, a combination of cytomorphological criteria and verification by ancillary techniques is required for the cytologic diagnosis of MPM. Detection of p16 homozygous deletion by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the most reliable ancillary technique for differentiating MPM from reactive mesothelial cells (RMC) because of its relatively high sensitivity and extremely high specificity. We showed that the p16 deletion status of MPM cells in pleural effusions reflected that of the underlying invasive MPM tissues, indicating the usefulness of p16 FISH in effusion smear cytology for MPM diagnosis. Thus, for differentiating MPM from RMC, we propose to perform p16 FISH as often as possible. A positive p16 homozygous deletion supports the diagnosis of MPM. However, a negative result does not rule out the possibility of MPM. In such cases, a morphological assessment is critical. Therefore, we analyzed the morphological characteristics of p16 deletion-positive mesothelioma cells using a combination of virtual microscopy and p16 FISH, and identified three morphological characteristics useful for the differentiation, including cell-in-cell engulfment with or without hump formation, multinucleate cells, and larger berry-like cell aggregates. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2016;44:774-780. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The aim of this study was to search for diagnostic markers that could correctly identify thyroid nodular lesions requiring urgent surgical treatment. We investigated whether galectin-3 and dipeptidyl peptidase IV (CD26/DPPIV) could be potential markers for improving the diagnostic accuracy of conventional cytology. Seventy-nine patients with histologically proven thyroid diseases were analyzed. The immunocytochemical staining results showed galectin-3 expression in neoplastic cells of all 37 papillary carcinomas, five of six follicular carcinomas, all three anaplastic carcinomas, one of three medullary carcinomas, and two of 14 follicular adenomas. All 16 adenomatous goiters were negative for galectin-3 immunostaining. On the other hand, all 37 papillary carcinomas, all six follicular carcinomas, and one of three anaplastic carcinomas revealed CD26/DPPIV expression, whereas all three medullary carcinomas were negative. Among benign thyroid lesions, four of 14 follicular adenomas and two of 16 adenomatous goiters exhibited varying degrees of immunoreactivity for CD26/DPPIV. RT-PCR analysis demonstrated overexpression of galectin-3 and CD26/DPPIV mRNAs in all six papillary and all three follicular carcinomas analyzed, whereas the mRNA expressions of these molecules were barely or not detectable in benign thyroid lesions and normal thyroid tissues, except for one case of follicular adenoma. In conclusion, we demonstrate that galectin-3 and CD26/DPPIV were consistently coexpressed at protein and mRNA levels in differentiated thyroid carcinomas. We propose that combined immunostaining for galectin-3 and CD26/DPPIV in the preoperative evaluation of thyroid nodules may play a role in accurate cytodiagnosis. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2002;26:366–372. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.