Search

An in vitro pharmacodynatnic modeling apparatus (PDMA) generated specific bacterial kill profiles for single-dose regimens of gatifloxacin (GT), gemifloxacin (GM), moxifloxacin (MX) and levofloxacin (LV) against isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae with specific QRDR profiles: SP-WT (no modifications); SP-C (changes in parC); and SP-AC (changes in both parC and gyrA). No differences in 3-log reduction time or total log reduction were observed among the four agents for SP-WT; however, LV failed to achieve a 3-log reduction in SP-C and SP-AC, and total log reduction after 12 hrs was minimal compared to the other agents. GM and MX required less time for 3-log reduction of SP-AC compared to GT, but total log reductions in SP-AC were similar among the three newer quinolone agents (GM > MX > GT). The study isolates with QRDR modifications greatly reduced LV activity. GM and MX maintained the greatest degree of activity against all study isolates and their activity was not adversely influenced by the genetic modifications in SP-C and SP-AC. The dual targeting characteristic of GM was also assessed, but did not offer significant advantages relative to MX and GT.

The Tigecycline Evaluation and Surveillance Trial began in 2004 to monitor the in vitro activity of tigecycline and comparator agents against a global collection of Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogens. Against Gram negatives (n = 63 699), tigecycline MIC(90)'s ranged from 0.25 to 2 mg/L for Escherichia coli, Haemophilus influenzae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella oxytoca, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Serratia marcescens (but was > or =32 for Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Against Gram-positive organisms (n = 32 218), tigecycline MIC(90)'s were between 0.06 and 0.25 mg/L for Streptococcus pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecium, Streptococcus agalactiae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Enterococcus faecalis. The in vitro activity of tigecycline was maintained against resistant phenotypes, including multidrug-resistant A. baumannii (9.2% of isolates), extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing E. coli (7.0%) and K. pneumoniae (14.0%), beta-lactamase-producing H. influenzae (22.2%), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (44.5%), vancomycin-resistant E. faecium (45.9%) and E. faecalis (2.8%), and penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae (13.8%). Tigecycline represents a welcome addition to the armamentarium against difficult to treat organisms.

A total of 57 clinical isolates were screened by disk diffusion for a related pharmacodynamic study. Testing was performed using National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines, except that results were interpreted at 16 to 18 h and 48 h. Of the 57 isolates, 19 were randomly chosen for additional comparative susceptibility testing of five methods (disk diffusion, Etest, Alamar colorimetric broth microdilution, Vitek, and MicroScan) and an in-house broth microdilution method. The two diffusion methods (disk and Etest) had the closest correlation. The commercial broth microdilution methods and the in-house microdilution method generated inconsistent results for all agents except trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Vitek compared poorly with both diffusion and microbroth dilution methods. The most significant discrepancies were evident with all methods when the incubation period was extended to 48 h. When results were interpreted at 48 h, the incidence of resistance for all bactericidal agents was approximately double the resistance observed at 16 to 18 h. The bacteriostatic agents, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and doxycycline, demonstrated the greatest in vitro activity and were least influenced by extended incubation with diffusion methods. Because correlative in vivo and in vitro studies have not revealed an effective therapeutic regimen for serious S. maltophilia infections, susceptibility results with all testing methods should be interpreted with caution when choosing therapy for patients with life-threatening infections. Susceptibility testing for this heterogeneous group remains controversial and routine testing, with the possible exception of doxycycline (or minocycline) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, should be avoided. Our data support that if testing is done with bactericidal agents, consideration should be given to interpretation after 48-h incubation.

Clarithromycin activity can be influenced by the pH of the surrounding environment. Evidence supports a reduced pH of middle ear fluid (MEF) and lung tissues in patients with otitis media and pneumonia, respectively. To evaluate the influence of pH on clarithromycin activity, an in vitro pharmacodynamic chamber model (PDCM) was used to generate bacterial time-kill curves for clarithromycin and a 2:1 ratio of clarithromycin and 14-hydroxyclarithromycin (HC) against Haemophilus influenzae at three different pH values: 7.2, 6.8, 6.4. Concentrations observed in MEF and lung tissues were simulated for clarithromycin alone and clarithromycin plus HC. Differences in activity at each pH were identified by comparing initial kill curve slopes and total log reduction. Experiments with amoxicillin-clavulanate were conducted as a reference. In simulated MEF regimens at pH 7.2, activity of clarithromycin alone improved by adding HC (additional 2 log 10 reduction at 8 h); however, at pH values of 6.8 and 6.4, kill curves resembled growth controls. In simulated lung regimens, differences between clarithromycin alone and clarithromycin plus HC were insignificant; both produced a 2 log 10 reduction at pH 7.2, and activity dramatically dropped to 10 as pH declined. In contrast, amoxicillin-clavulanate consistently produced a 3 log 10 reduction over each pH value with more rapid initial kill relative to all clarithromycin regimens. These findings suggest the activity of clarithromycin against H. influenzae may be significantly compromised in respiratory tract infections involving a reduced pH. Trials with emphasis on clinical outcomes analysis will assist further in determining the significance of these experimental findings.