1. A Comparative Study of a New Class of Gastric Acid Suppressant Agent Named Vonoparazan versus Esomeprazole for the Eradication of Helicobacter pylori
- Author
-
Akihiko Okada, Kenji Momose, Takaaki Eguchi, Keiko Shimoyama, Atsushi Kanamori, Mikio Fujita, Akio Koizumi, Hiroshi Yamashita, Chise Kano, Takumi Fukuchi, Kei Matsumoto, Hiroki Hashimura, and Masahiro Tsujimae
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,macromolecular substances ,Gastroenterology ,Helicobacter Infections ,Esomeprazole ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Japan ,Clarithromycin ,Metronidazole ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Pyrroles ,Disease Eradication ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Sulfonamides ,Original Paper ,Helicobacter pylori ,biology ,business.industry ,Amoxicillin ,Proton Pump Inhibitors ,Middle Aged ,Anti-Ulcer Agents ,biology.organism_classification ,Anti-Bacterial Agents ,Treatment Outcome ,Breath Tests ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Gastric acid ,Drug Therapy, Combination ,Female ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Background:Helicobacter pylori eradication rates have decreased worldwide. Gastric acid inhibition during treatment is important to eradicate these bacteria successfully. A new potassium-competitive acid blocker, vonoprazan (VPZ), has been shown to achieve high eradication rates in a previous randomized controlled trial. Objective: To determine the efficacy of VPZ for H. pylori eradication. Methods: A total of 874 patients were enrolled; 431 received esomeprazole (EPZ) and 443 received VPZ. First-line regimens contained clarithromycin (CAM) 200 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin 750 mg b.i.d., and either EPZ 20 mg b.i.d. or VPZ 20 mg b.i.d. for 7 days. Metronidazole 250 mg b.i.d. replaced CAM in the second-line regimens. The eradication of H. pylori was assessed by 13C-urea breath tests 4-8 weeks after each therapy. Results: The overall first-line eradication rate was 79.9% (341/427) with EPZ vs. 86.3% (377/439) with VPZ (p = 0.019). The second-line eradication rate was 83.3% (45/51) with EPZ vs. 91.1% (41/45) with VPZ (p = 0.900). Conclusion: VPZ was significantly more effective than EPZ for first-line treatment. However, for second-line treatment, there was no significant difference between EPZ and VPZ.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF