Search

Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration and fine‐needle biopsy (EUS‐FNA/FNB) is not fully established as a pathological sampling tool for gallbladder lesions due to limited evidence. We therefore aimed to clarify the effectiveness and safety of this procedure in a large‐population cohort. Methods: This study retrospectively evaluated the diagnostic yield of EUS‐FNA/FNB for accurately differentiating between benign and malignant gallbladder lesions. Puncture targets included the gallbladder mass, lymph node, and liver mass. Adverse events and factors associated with diagnostic accuracy were analyzed as well. Results: In 187 patients with gallbladder lesions undergoing EUS‐FNA/FNB, 18 benign lesions and 169 malignant lesions were identified. Overall sampling adequacy was 98% (184/187). The diagnostic accuracy of EUS‐FNA/FNB was 97% (182/187), sensitivity was 97% (164/169), and specificity was 100% (18/18). A single postprocedural complication (minor bleeding) was recorded in one patient. In the 169 cases of malignancy, 203 sites were punctured for pathological sampling of the primary mass (n = 94), lymph node (n = 79), and metastatic liver mass (n = 30). No significant difference was found for diagnostic accuracy among the puncture sites (P = 0.70). In cases having specimens obtained from the primary mass, the accuracy of those targeting liver invasion sites was significantly higher than that of other sites (98% vs. 83%, P < 0.01). Conclusion: EUS‐FNA/FNB demonstrated clinical usefulness and safety for the pathological diagnosis of gallbladder lesions, with high diagnostic yield and a low incidence of adverse events. Targeting the site of liver infiltration may improve the diagnostic rate of EUS‐FNA/FNB in the primary mass. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a case study of a 82-year-old woman with hepatic hilar carcinoma who had been treated using several metal stents 6 months previously was admitted with obstructive jaundice. It discusses that computed tomography imaging indicated stent obstruction and the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography showed obstruction in the hepatic bile ducts and subsequent treatment provided to the patient.

Tract dilation is one of the most difficult stages of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS‐HGS), especially for beginners. To overcome this problem, we applied a special dedicated dilator. Herein, we retrospectively evaluate the safety and usefulness of a novel drill dilator in EUS‐HGS. This single‐center retrospective study included 20 consecutive patients who underwent EUS‐HGS with a novel drill dilator. The tip is 0.77 mm, and it becomes 7F at 3 cm from tip. The track is dilated to 7F by simple clockwise rotation. The technical success rate of both initial tract dilation and stent placement was 20/20 (100%). No cases required additional dilation such as balloon or electric cautery. In 13/20 cases (65.0%), EUS‐HGS was performed by beginner endoscopists. Median time required for dilation was 62.5 s (range, 30–144 s). Median procedure time was 13 min (range, 7–25 min). Early adverse events were two cases of mild fever. There was no bile leakage or bleeding. The novel drill dilator appears to be safe and useful for EUS‐HGS. As it is not necessary to press the device strongly, there is no pushback during dilation and the scope position is stable. These characteristics facilitate EUS‐HGS even for beginners. This device may enable the further development and increased dissemination of EUS intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A prerequisite for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)‐guided hepaticogastrostomy (HGS) is adequate dilation of the intrahepatic bile duct. Compared with a 19G needle, the 22G needle offers more flexible manipulation and superior ability to achieve bile duct puncture. However, evidence regarding EUS‐HGS using a 22G needle remains limited. The present study evaluated the feasibility and safety of EUS‐HGS using a novel 0.018‐inch guidewire and 22G needle for patients with insufficient intrahepatic bile duct dilation. If the bile duct diameter was <1.5 mm, a 22G needle was used, and the diameter was ≥1.5 mm; puncture with a 19G needle was first attempted, with the 22G needle being inserted if initial bile duct puncture failed. EUS‐HGS using the 22G needle was attempted in a total of 10 patients, including one patient with failed insertion of a 19G needle. Median diameter of the puncture site was 1.2 mm (range 0.5–2.5 mm). Bile duct puncture using the 22G needle was successful in all patients. Insertion of the novel 0.018‐inch guidewire was also successful in all patients. However, since tract dilation using an ultra‐tapered mechanical dilator failed in two patients, tract dilation was performed using a balloon dilator. Finally, stent deployment was successfully performed in all patients. EUS‐HGS using a 22G needle with a novel 0.018‐inch guidewire appears safe and feasible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]