Search

Purpose: This project aimed to develop, implement and evaluate a train-the-trainer initiative for community rehabilitation workers (CRWs) and rehabilitation specialists within a community rehabilitation program for children with delayed development in Tamil Nadu, India.Methods: Guided by the Knowledge to Action framework, non-governmental and academic partners collaboratively developed two 2-day workshops for (1) rehabilitation specialists and (2) CRWs. Outcomes were evaluated using mixed methods, with pre and 2.5-months post surveys (59 participants) and three focus groups (17 participants) involving trainers and trainees (including rehabilitation specialists and CRWs).Results: There were significant increases in the CRWs' self-perception of their capacity to assess comprehension, provide explanations, respond to questions, adjust teaching, motivate learners, communicate effectively, and provide feedback. Significant changes were noted for rehabilitation specialists in five of seven domains, and for rehabilitation specialist leads in six of seven domains. Participants appreciated the interactive training style, and the use of immersive methods such as role play, though noted challenges when instructions were unclear or when they felt that material was more theoretical.Conclusions: This collaboratively developed train-the-trainer project demonstrates the value of such an intervention, provides an example of how a tailored program can be developed, and suggests the importance of stakeholder-driven design processes.Implications for RehabilitationThe ability to provide effective training is a core skill set for people engaged in community-based rehabilitation (CBR) programs, yet examples of initiatives to train trainers are lacking, as is their evaluation.This project demonstrates the value of a collaborative and tailored train-the-trainer program to support community rehabilitation workers and rehabilitation specialists in their training roles within a CBR program in India.A stakeholder-driven design process supported by a collaboration between non-governmental organization and academic partners enhanced the capacity to develop, implement and evaluate the train-the-trainer program.

Purpose: To determine the current state of pain education across physiotherapy programs in Canada. Materials and methods: Educators that were responsible for teaching pain-related content at each of the 14 Canadian physiotherapy programs were invited to complete a cross-sectional survey. The online survey evaluated total time spent on pain education and the integration of content from international guidelines on pain education curricula. Results and conclusions: Complete data were obtained from all Canadian physiotherapy programs. The total median time spent on pain education was 18 h, ranging from 8 to 65 h. Across all programs, only 38.6% of the recommended pain curriculum themes were fully integrated within physiotherapy programs. Most of the curriculum themes were partially addressed (median: 52.6%) and a small minority were not addressed (median: 10.5%). There was an overall trend in which greater time spent on pain education corresponded to a higher proportion of pain curriculum themes that were fully integrated. This is the first national survey of pain education that has included all physiotherapy programs across Canada. These data provide a foundation for understanding the current resources and content dedicated to pain education and are an essential step in benchmarking and potentially improving pain education for physiotherapists.Implications for rehabilitationIntegrating pain education within entry-level physiotherapy programs is a foundational step in translating pain research into effective physiotherapy pain management.This survey of all entry-level physiotherapy programs across Canada shows considerable variability in the time and scope of pain education and that, on average, less than 40% of recommended pain education curriculum content is adequately addressed.This work highlights the need for national reference standards in pain education to help improve consistency across training programs. Integrating pain education within entry-level physiotherapy programs is a foundational step in translating pain research into effective physiotherapy pain management. This survey of all entry-level physiotherapy programs across Canada shows considerable variability in the time and scope of pain education and that, on average, less than 40% of recommended pain education curriculum content is adequately addressed. This work highlights the need for national reference standards in pain education to help improve consistency across training programs.

Purpose: To describe how stakeholder engagement has been undertaken and evaluated in rehabilitation research. Methods: A scoping review of the scientific literature using five search strategies. Quantitative and qualitative analyses using extracted data. Interpretation of results was iteratively discussed within the team, which included a parent stakeholder. Results: Searches identified 101 candidate papers; 28 were read in full to assess eligibility and 19 were included in the review. People with disabilities and their families were more frequently involved compared to other stakeholders. Stakeholders were often involved in planning and evaluating service delivery. A key issue was identifying stakeholders; strategies used to support their involvement included creating committees, organizing meetings, clarifying roles and offering training. Communication, power sharing and resources influenced how stakeholders could be engaged in the research. Perceived outcomes of stakeholder engagement included the creation of partnerships, facilitating the research process and the application of the results, and empowering stakeholders. Stakeholder engagement outcomes were rarely formally evaluated. Conclusions: There is a great interest in rehabilitation to engage stakeholders in the research process. However, further evidence is needed to identify effective strategies for meaningful stakeholder engagement that leads to more useful research that positively impacts practice.Implications for RehabilitationUsing several strategies to engage various stakeholders throughout the research process is thought to increase the quality of the research and the rehabilitation process by developing proposals and programs responding better to their needs.Engagement strategies need to be better reported and evaluated in the literature.Engagement facilitate uptake of research findings by increasing stakeholders’ awareness of the evidence, the resources available and their own ability to act upon a situation.Factors influencing opportunities for stakeholder engagement need to be better understood. Using several strategies to engage various stakeholders throughout the research process is thought to increase the quality of the research and the rehabilitation process by developing proposals and programs responding better to their needs. Engagement strategies need to be better reported and evaluated in the literature. Engagement facilitate uptake of research findings by increasing stakeholders’ awareness of the evidence, the resources available and their own ability to act upon a situation. Factors influencing opportunities for stakeholder engagement need to be better understood.

Knowledge translation (KT) has emerged as a concept that can lead to a greater utilization of evidence-based research in systems of care. Despite a rise in KT research, the literature on KT in relation to physical therapy practice is scarce. This article provides physical therapists (PTs) with recommendations that can support the effective implementation of new knowledge and scientific evidence in clinical practice.Recommendations are grounded in the Ottawa Model of Research Use and in the literature in KT in the health professions.A well-established KT process, which is supported by a planning model, is essential to guide the implementation of scientific evidence. Consensus among all stakeholders about what evidence will be implemented must be reached. Context-related barriers and facilitators should be assessed and tailored active and multi-component interventions should be considered. Participation from individuals in intermediary positions (e.g. opinion leaders) supports implementation of KT interventions. Monitoring of the process and assessment of intended outcomes should be performed in order to assess the success of the implementation.Five major recommendations grounded in the Ottawa model are provided that can assist PTs with the complex task of implementing new knowledge in their clinical practice.In order to support EBP, knowledge translation interventions can be used to support best practice. Implementation of new knowledge should be guided by a framework or a conceptual model. Consensus on the evidence must be reached and assessment of context-related factors should be done prior to the implementation of any KT intervention. Intervention strategies should be active, multi-component and include individuals with intermediary positions that can facilitate the KT process.

This study attempted to capture the evidence-based practice (EBP) behaviours of expert occupational therapy (OT) clinicians in order to develop a reference model of EBP in falls prevention.Expert clinicians participated in the creation of a clinical vignette through focus group discussions. Using the vignette as the stimulus case, the same clinicians answered questions that reflected the EBP process. Validation of original responses and data synthesis occurred through a second focus group. This validation process resulted in the elaboration of a tree structure EBP decision model.Findings show that clinicians are not expert evidence-based practitioners. Although some of the experts' clinical decisions were based on a combination of professional experience and research evidence, clinicians relied primarily on clinical experience for more complex aspects of decision-making. When explicitly instructed to answer questions corresponding to the five EBP steps, experts were compelled to think about the use of evidence and could proceed through the EBP process.The model represents the expert clinical decisions in each of the EBP steps and illustrates what aspects of the decision-making process are in line with EBP versus aspects that are driven primarily by experience. This research has the potential to assist clinicians working in prevention of falls in geriatric rehabilitation who can use the model as a practice framework to guide them through the EBP process.

The purpose of this article is to reflect on the concept of habit as an under-explored, but critically important factor that might help explain the lack of uptake of new, scientifically sound practices by rehabilitation clinicians.The complexity relating to being a scholarly practitioner is first presented. The transtheoretical model of behaviour change, developed to better understand behaviour change such as stopping a 'bad' habit or implementing a 'good' one for health improvement purposes, is used to foster reflection on factors involved in uptake of best practices in rehabilitation. To illustrate simply the different scenarios relating to uptake of best practices, such as the use of a standardised tool over a home-grown one, two well known approaches to assessment (use of thermometer versus hand on forehead) that could be used to assess the same construct (body temperature) are contrasted.As rehabilitation clinicians, we are potentially blocked in our uptake of best practices by our habits. Although habits are often comfortable, and change is less so, we need to move away from our comfort zone if we are to adopt best practices.Given the extensive literature suggesting that there are major gaps between best practice and actual practices, it behoves us to explore the impact of habits to a greater extent.