Search

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to identify domains of influence on co-workers' ability to be supportive of returning worker during the work reintegration (WR) process., Methods: An ethnographic study design was chosen involving fieldwork at four different workplaces, at an emergency care service, a waste disposal company and at two nursing homes. Qualitative methods for inquiry were used including participant observation, individual- and group interviews of 30 participants. Data were coded and analysed according to a grounded theory approach., Results: Four themes were identified related to domains of influence on co-workers' ability to be supportive of returning worker during the WR process: (1) organisation of work and level of interaction; (2) disruption of work routines, (3) relationship with returning worker and (4) attitudes towards sick leave., Conclusion: The WR process after long-term sick leave is not only influenced by the WR's arrangements made, but also by the co-workers' responses to the process. Work arrangements not only affect the returning worker's ability to return-to-work (RTW) successfully, but also the co-workers' ability to be supportive and their ability to take active part in the process. Implications for Rehabilitation The process of WR after long-term sick leave involves interaction with co-workers. Domains of influence is in the co-workers' perspective influencing their ability to be supportive during reintegration of a returning worker. Future WR management could benefit from integrating the conditions for co-worker support. We encourage co-workers to be involved in the RTW planning, monitoring and evaluation with particular focus on how the WR arrangements are influencing their work and their ability to be supportive.

Purpose: Biopsychosocial interventions in low back pain (LBP) rehabilitation aim at preparing patients to accept and manage their pain conditions and to encourage them to maintain their everyday life routines. Although such approaches have demonstrated a positive effect, for example, in relation to return to work (RTW), few studies have explored how social contexts influence how pain is being managed. Using a theoretical approach that addresses pain as social performance, we illustrate how pain is expressed and managed in three different contexts: at the clinic, at home and at work., Methods: Qualitative in-depth interviews were conducted with eight patients who had followed a hospital-based RTW intervention., Results: Low back patients experience dilemmas of how to express their pain sensations and constantly evaluate whether the activities they participate in will ease or worsen their pain sensations. In this process, their behavior is guided by how they think their social role will be affected by their decision to abstain from or undertake the activities in question., Conclusions: Interventions in rehabilitation may benefit from knowledge of the social processes at play when LBP patients articulate, express and suppress their symptoms in their interaction with health professionals, workmates, families and friends., Implications for Rehabilitation: Low back pain • In order to manage pain, patients with low back pain are encouraged to exercise and to maintain their everyday activities. • Choosing to become physically active, although in pain, is related to those social roles one wishes to maintain or support. • Future interventions could offer support so that patients will be able both to maintain their social roles and to retire from social activities without their social roles being threatened.