Search

Purpose: The aim of the current study was to examine the associations between coping and psychological well-being among adults with sensory loss and their spouses., Methods: A total of 183 adults with sensory loss and 133 spouses participated in an online survey and were followed up six months later. Coping and well-being were measured using the Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Scale (Brief COPE) and the five-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5), respectively. Cross-sectional and longitudinal intra- and interpersonal effects of coping on psychological well-being were analyzed using a structural equation modeling approach., Results: Results showed that a significant portion of adults with sensory loss (32.4%) and spouses (23.8%) had poor well-being, and this remained stable over the six-month period. Coping styles associated with the well-being of adults with sensory loss included active coping, avoidance, distraction, venting and spouse support seeking. Coping styles associated with the well-being of spouses included support seeking, distraction, venting, avoidance (by partner) and humor (by partner)., Conclusion: The results highlight the need to support the well-being of adults with sensory loss and their spouses in rehabilitation, and the importance of both intra- and interpersonal coping in the adjustment process. Implications for rehabilitation Rehabilitation specialists and social workers working with adults with sensory loss should, where possible, incorporate family members into support plans. Rehabilitation specialists and social workers working in sensory rehabilitation should be mindful of how the coping styles of one partner can impact the well-being of their significant other. In addition to promoting positive coping behaviors, such as planning and support seeking, rehabilitation specialists and social workers should also take care to identify and reduce maladaptive coping behaviors such as avoidance and distraction. Online and print information for spouses on how to cope with a partner's sensory loss should be available and accessible for couples attending sensory rehabilitation clinics.

Purpose: (1) To profile sensory deficits examined in the ability to process sensory information from daily environment and discriminate between tactile stimuli among patients with controlled and un-controlled diabetes mellitus. (2) Examine the relationship between the sensory deficits and patients' health-related quality of life., Methods: This study included 115 participants aged 33-55 with uncontrolled (n = 22) or controlled (n = 24) glycemic levels together with healthy subjects (n = 69). All participants completed the brief World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire, the Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile and performed the tactile discrimination test., Results: Sensory deficits were more emphasized among patients with uncontrolled glycemic levels as expressed in difficulties to register sensory input, lower sensation seeking in daily environments and difficulties to discriminate between tactile stimuli. They also reported the lowest physical and social quality of life as compared to the other two groups. Better sensory seeking and registration predicted better quality of life. Disease control and duration contributed to these predictions., Conclusions: Difficulties in processing sensory information from their daily environments are particularly prevalent among patients with uncontrolled glycemic levels, and significantly impacted their quality of life. Clinicians should screen for sensory processing difficulties among patients with diabetes mellitus and understand their impacts on patients' quality of life. Implications for Rehabilitation Patients with diabetes mellitus, and particularly those with uncontrolled glycemic levels, may have difficulties in processing sensory information from daily environment. A multidisciplinary intervention approach is recommended: clinicians should screen for sensory processing deficits among patients with diabetes mellitus and understand their impacts on patients' daily life. By providing the patients with environmental adaptations and coping strategies, clinicians may assist in optimizing sensory experiences in real life context and elevate patients' quality of life. Relating to quality of life and emphasizing a multidisciplinary approach is of major importance in broadening our understanding of health conditions and providing holistic treatment for patients.

Purpose: Individuals with sensory modulation disorder (SMD) demonstrate abnormal responses to naturally occurring stimuli in a manner that interferes with daily life activities. This study is the first study applying quantitative sensory testing to characterize the somatosensory sensitivity of adults with SMD., Method: One hundred and fifty one adults (68 males and 83 females) were tested comparing 91 SMD to 60 SMD-free, control individuals. Group placement (SMD vs. SMD-free) was determined using the Sensory Responsiveness Questionnaire (SRQ). Sensory detection thresholds for skin warming, cooling, punctate dynamic tactile sensation, vibration and thermal pain thresholds for heat and cold stimuli were determined at several body sites. Pinprick pain and prickliness were also assessed, as well as the duration and intensity of the after-sensations of prickliness and pain evoked by the prickly stimuli., Results: Compared to control adults, individuals with SMD showed significantly higher pain intensity to prickle stimuli, marginally higher pain intensity to pinprick and hypoesthesia to punctate dynamic tactile sensation at one of two sites tested., Conclusions: These results are in line with our previous study that investigated children with SMD using the same stimuli, and found similar results. We suggest a CNS involvement as the underlying mechanisms in SMD.

Purpose: Individuals with Sensory Modulation Disorder (SMD) are characterized by an inability to normally grade the degree, intensity and nature of their responses to sensory input and are limited in their ability to fully participate in daily life activities, and attain optimal quality of life. Most existing diagnostic tools are intended for paediatric populations. A questionnaire that assesses the intensity of the affective-emotive responsiveness of adults to stimuli in all sensory modalities and the frequency of such responses for diagnosing adults with disorders in sensory modulation is necessary. This article describes the development and assessment of the psychometric properties of a novel instrument, the Sensory Responsiveness Questionnaire (SRQ), for this purpose (see Appendix)., Method: The SRQ evolved through three developmental phases (Pilot, Version-I, and the most recent Version-II). Each phase comprised several studies conducted to further refine the instrument and to examine its psychometric properties with adults with Sensory Modulation Disorder versus SMD-free individuals (n=39 for the pilot version, n=399 for Version-I, and n=48 for Version-II)., Results: The scales of Version-II indicated high test-retest reliability, moderate criterion validity and strong significant construct validity., Conclusion: There is strong indication that the SRQ can be used to diagnose adults with SMD.

Purpose: The present study evaluates gross motor abilities and self perception about the physical abilities of pre-school children with amblyopia, in comparison to their unaffected peers., Method: Twenty-two children with amblyopia, and 25 children with normal vision, aged 4-7, were included in this study. Gross motor abilities were evaluated by the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (MABC). The Pictorial Scale of Perceived Competence and Social Acceptance for Young Children were used to measure physical self perception. Parents completed a questionnaire about everyday situations revolving around the child's balance and posture abilities., Results: Amblyopic children performed significantly worse than the controls according to the MABC subtests and the parents' questionnaire total score. In the scale of perceived competence evaluation the amblyopic children had lower scores in half of the items as well as in the total mean score, but the differences between the groups were not significant. Among the study group, significant correlations were found between several items in the parents' questionnaire and the children's' mean balance score in MABC., Conclusions: Amblyopia may negatively impact children's motor abilities as expressed by the objective measures in daily living, while self perception is less affected.