Search

Anorectal diseases require imaging for proper case management. At present, endoanal ultrasonography and endorectal ultrasonography have become important parts of diagnostic workup of patients with fecal incontinence, perianal fistulas, and rectal cancer and provides sufficient information for clinical decision-making in many cases. However, with the currently available ultrasonographic equipment and techniques, a good deal of relevant information may remain hidden. The advent of high-resolution three-dimensional endoluminal ultrasound, constructed from a synthesis of standard two-dimensional cross-sectional images, and of “Volume Render Mode,” a technique to analyze information inside a three-dimensional volume by digitally enhancing individual voxels, promises to revolutionize diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders. By use of the different postprocessing display parameters, the volume-rendered image provides better visualization performance when there are not large differences in the signal levels of pathologic structures compared with surrounding tissues. The anatomic structures in the pelvis, the axial and longitudinal extension of anal sphincter defects, the anatomy of the fistulous tract in complex perianal sepsis, and the presence of slight or massive submucosal invasion in early rectal cancer may be imaged in greater detail. This additional information will bring an improvement for both planning and conduct of surgical procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to assess the integrity of the anal sphincters after handsewn pouch-anal anastomosis performed with the help of a Scott retractor. For this purpose the anal sphincters were visualized with three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography. METHODS: Patients undergoing a colonic pouch-anal anastomosis or an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were included. Before and six months after the procedure, the length and volume of both sphincters were assessed with three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography, and anal manometry was performed. Continence scores were determined using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI). RESULTS: Fifteen patients with a colonic pouch and 13 patients with an ileal pouch were examined. Six months after the procedure, three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography showed significant alterations of the internal anal sphincter in eight patients with a colonic pouch-anal anastomosis (53 percent) and in eight patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (62 percent). These alterations were characterized by asymmetry or thinning. No defects were seen in the colonic pouch group, but, in two patients with an ileal pouch, a small defect in the internal anal sphincter was found. A decrease in internal anal sphincter volume was seen only in patients with a colonic pouch-anal anastomosis (P = 0.009). In both groups the length of the internal anal sphincter and the length, thickness, and volume of the external anal sphincter remained the same. After the procedure a reduction of maximum anal resting pressure was found in both groups (colonic pouch: P < 0.001, ileal pouch: P = 0.001). Maximum anal squeeze pressure was reduced in only patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (P = 0.006). The observed alterations of the internal anal sphincter and the manometric findings showed no correlation with the postoperative Fecal Incontinence Severity Index scores. CONCLUSION: Handsewn pouch-anal anastomosis, performed with the help of a Scott retractor, only rarely leads to internal anal sphincter defects, but three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography shows alterations of the internal anal sphincter in 57 percent of the patients. No correlation was observed between these alterations and the functional outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: This study was designed to estimate the prevalence of anal sphincter injury after forceps delivery in a large population of females managed by trained obstetricians in a French hospital and to identify factors predictive for anal sphincter injury. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of healthy females older than 18 years with no history of anal incontinence, anorectal abnormalities, or anorectal surgery after their first vaginal delivery. All females were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire concerning intestinal transit and continence status. Physical examination and endoanal ultrasonography were performed after delivery. RESULTS: Between November 1999 and November 2000, 93 females were included in the study after their first forceps delivery. Eleven patients (11.8 percent) had a partial defect involving the external sphincter, visible on ultrasonography. One patient (1.1 percent) had a partial defect of external sphincter with complete defect of internal sphincter (sequelae of primary repair of a third-degree perineal tear). Seventeen patients (18.2 percent) had flatus incontinence, and four patients (4.3 percent) had liquid stool incontinence. A high daily number of stools was significantly associated with sphincter defect visible on ultrasonography (P = 0.02). The development of anal incontinence was not related to sphincter defect on ultrasonography. There was a strong association between perineal tear and sphincter defect visible on ultrasonography (odds ratio, 4.5 (range, 1.2–16.7)). CONCLUSIONS: Anal sphincter injury after forceps delivery was identified in <13 percent of our large population of healthy females. Our study does not confirm previous observations that anal sphincter injury is common after forceps delivery; previously published studies may have overestimated the prevalence of this condition. The only factor with significant predictive value for anal sphincter injury was perineal tear. Anal endosonography should be recommended after obstetric perineal tear. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine agreement between hydrogen peroxide–enhanced three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative assessment of perianal fistulas and to compare these results with the surgical findings. METHODS: Twenty-one patients (aged 26–71 years) with clinical symptoms of a cryptoglandular perianal fistula and a visible external opening underwent preoperative hydrogen peroxide–enhanced three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography, endoanal magnetic resonance imaging, and surgical exploration. The results were assessed separately by experienced observers blinded as to each other’s findings. Each fistula was described with notice of the following characteristics: classification of the primary fistula tract according to Parks (intersphincteric, transsphincteric, extrasphincteric, or suprasphincteric), horseshoe, or not classified; presence of secondary tracts (circular or linear); and location of an internal opening. RESULTS: The median time between hydrogen peroxide–enhanced three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging was 66 (interquartile range, 21–160) days; the median time between the last study (hydrogen peroxide–enhanced three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography or endoanal magnetic resonance imaging) and surgery was 154 (interquartile range, 95–189) days. Agreement for the classification of the primary fistula tract was 81 percent for hydrogen peroxide–enhanced three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography and surgery, 90 percent for endoanal magnetic resonance imaging and surgery, and 90 percent for hydrogen peroxide–enhanced three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging. For secondary tracts, agreement was 67 percent for hydrogen peroxide–enhanced three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography and surgery, 57 percent for endoanal magnetic resonance imaging and surgery, and 71 percent for hydrogen peroxide–enhanced three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging in case of circular tracts and 76 percent, 81 percent, and 71 percent, respectively, in case of linear tracts. Agreement for the location of an internal opening was 86 percent for hydrogen peroxide–enhanced three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography and surgery, 86 percent for endoanal magnetic resonance imaging and surgery, and 90 percent for hydrogen peroxide–enhanced three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging. CONCLUSIONS: For evaluation of perianal fistulas, hydrogen peroxide–enhanced three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging have good agreement, especially for classification of the primary fistula tract and the location of an internal opening. These results also show good agreement compared with surgical findings. Therefore, hydrogen peroxide–enhanced three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging can both be used as reliable methods for preoperative evaluation of perianal fistulas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endoanal ultrasonography has become an important tool in the evaluation of patients with anal incontinence. However, the extent of anterior defects is sometimes difficult to quantitate during endoanal ultrasonography.This study was designed to evaluate perineal body measurement during endoanal ultrasonography in assessing patients with obstetric anal sphincter injuries.Forty-two patients with anal incontinence because of obstetric sphincter injuries and 13 asymptomatic subjects were investigated with endoanal ultrasonography. Sphincter muscle thickness, sphincter defects, and perineal body were measured. Perineal body measurement was performed by inserting a finger, held gently against the posterior vaginal wall, into the vagina and measuring the distance between the inner surface of the internal sphincter and the ultrasonographic reflection of the finger.All patients had anterior sphincter lesions of varying extent. Mean size of internal sphincter lesions was 146°, and mean size of external sphincter lesions was 107° (P<0.001). Perineal body measurement was performed without difficulty in all patients and subjects. Perineal body measurement (mean ± standard deviation) was 6±2 mm in patients and 12±3 mm in asymptomatic subjects (P<0.001). Ninety-three percent of patients had perineal body measurement <-10 mm, and 70 percent of asymptomatic subjects had perineal body measurement >10 mm. Digital delineation of the perineal body during endoanal ultrasonography improved the visualization of sphincter lesions in 74 percent of patients.Digital delineation of the perineal body during endoanal ultrasonography improved the visualization of sphincter lesions in the majority of patients. Perineal body measurement is performed without difficulty and is a good predictor of anterior sphincter lesions. Use of this technique improves visualization of sphincter lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]