Search

Purpose: Controversies abound regarding the optimal surgical management in noncomplicated diverticulitis of the right colon, ranging from a conservative approach to diverticulectomy to right hemicolectomy. One of the arguments for resection is to exclude carcinoma. However, there is significant morbidity associated with resection. We aim to introduce on-table cecoscopy as a tool to improve the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis of the right colon, exclude carcinoma, and reduce the rate of resection., Methods: From October 1999 to June 2000, five patients presented to our unit with suspected acute appendicitis. Intraoperatively, we found a colonic inflammatory mass at either the cecum or the ascending colon. The cecum and ascending colon were mobilized, and bowel clamps were applied to the ascending colon and ileum. A bronchoscope (Olympus(R) BF-P200) was introduced through the appendix stump. To achieve a good endoscopic view, a limited volume of air was introduced through the working channel., Results: After on-table cecoscopy, all the patients were diagnosed as having acute nonperforated diverticulitis of the right colon. They received appendicectomy, and the diverticulitis was managed conservatively. They were treated with a course of cephalosporin and metronidazole. We performed colonoscopy four weeks later and confirmed that none of them had carcinoma of the colon., Conclusions: On-table cecoscopy is a new, safe, and effective means of diagnosing acute diverticulitis of the right colon. We can confidently exclude carcinoma and reduce the amount of colonic resection in patients with noncomplicated diverticulitis of the right colon.

Purpose: Our aim was to test the hypothesis that laparoscopic-assisted resection for colorectal cancer has an immunologic advantage over traditional open surgery., Methods: Sixteen patients with colorectal cancer were randomized to undergo laparoscopic-assisted resection or open surgery. Basic patient data were recorded, and serum interleukin-6 levels, relative proportions of lymphocytes, and human leukocyte antigen-DR expression on monocytes were determined at specific time intervals., Results: Operating time was longer for laparoscopic-assisted resection (P=0.02), but analgesic requirements were less (P=0.04). All patients exhibited the following: interleukin-6 levels increased to a maximum at 4 hours and returned to preoperative levels within 48 hours. This response appeared greater for open resection (mean peak level, 313 vs. 173 pg/ml; P=0.25). Relative granulocytosis (P < 0.001) was seen within 48 hours, which was offset by a decrease in percentage of lymphocytes (P < 0.001). Changes in lymphocyte subfractions were most significant seven days postsurgery: natural killer cells decreased (P=0.003); T cells increased (P=0.008), with elevation in the CD4/CD8 ratio (P=0.003). B cells were largely unchanged at all time periods. Human leukocyte antigen-DR expression on monocytes was significantly less at 48 hours postsurgery (P < 0.001). All changes were reversed within three weeks of surgery. There were no differences when comparing laparoscopic-assisted resection with open surgery., Conclusions: Both laparoscopic-assisted resection and open surgery affect the immune response. It would appear that laparoscopic-assisted resection does not have an immunologic advantage over open surgery in patients with colorectal cancer.

Good results of rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse have been achieved using the transabdominal approach. With the introduction of the laparoscopic technique in cholecystectomy, many other abdominal procedures have been tried with the laparoscopic technique with varying degrees of success. The laparoscopic technique has opened up a new possibility of a minimally invasive approach to rectopexy. With the elimination of a major incision in laparoscopic rectopexy, the patients may benefit from less morbidity associated with a major abdominal wound. In this case report, laparoscopic rectal mobilization and rectopexy using Marlex mesh and a hernia stapler is reported.