Search

Despite the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer, lateral pelvic lymph node recurrence is still an important problem.This study aimed to determine the indication for lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in post neoadjuvant chemoradiation rectal cancer.This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected institutional database.This study was conducted at a tertiary care cancer center from January 2006 through December 2017.Patients who had rectal cancer with suspected lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis, who underwent total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic lymph node dissection, were included.The primary outcome measured was pathologic lateral pelvic lymph node positivity.The associations between lateral pelvic lymph node size on post-neoadjuvant chemoradiation imaging and pathologic lateral pelvic lymph node positivity and recurrence outcomes were evaluated.A total of 64 patients were analyzed. The mean lateral pelvic lymph node size before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiation was 12.6 ± 9.5 mm and 8.5 ± 5.4 mm. The minimum size of positive lateral pelvic lymph node was 5 mm on post neoadjuvant chemoradiation imaging. Among 13 (20.3%) patients who had a5 mm lateral pelvic lymph node after neoadjuvant chemoradiation, none were pathologically positive. Among 51 (79.7%) patients who had a ≥5 mm lateral pelvic lymph node after neoadjuvant chemoradiation, 33 patients (64.7%) were pathologically positive. Five-year overall survival and disease-specific survival were higher in the histologic lateral pelvic lymph node negative group than in the lateral pelvic lymph node positive group (overall survival 79.6% vs 61.8%, p = 0.122; disease-specific survival 84.5% vs 66.2%, p= 0.088). After a median 39 months of follow-up, there were no patients in the5 mm group who died of cancer. There were no lateral compartment recurrences in the entire cohort.Being a single-center retrospective study may limit generalizability.Post-neoadjuvant chemoradiation lateral pelvic lymph node size ≥5 mm was strongly associated with pathologic positivity. No patients with size5 mm had pathologically positive lymph nodes. Following lateral pelvic lymph node dissection, no patients with a positive lateral pelvic lymph node developed lateral compartment recurrence. Therefore, patients who have rectal cancer with clinical evidence of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis and post-neoadjuvant chemoradiation lateral pelvic lymph node size ≥5 mm should be considered for lateral pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of total mesorectal excision. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B3. ¿QUIéN DEBE RECIBIR LINFADENECTOMíA PéLVICA LATERAL DESPUéS DE LA QUIMIORRADIACIóN NEOADYUVANTE?: A pesar del uso de quimiorradiación neoadyuvante y la escisión total de mesorectao para el cáncer de recto, la recurrencia en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales sigue siendo un problema importante.Determinar la indicación para la disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales en el cáncer rectal post quimiorradiación neoadyuvante. DISEÑO:: Análisis retrospectivo de la base de datos institucional prospectivamente recopilada.Centro de cáncer de atención terciaria, de enero de 2006 hasta diciembre de 2017.Pacientes con cáncer de recto con sospecha de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales, que se sometieron a escisión total mesorectal con disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales.Positividad de ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales en histopatología.Se evaluaron las asociaciones entre el tamaño de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales en imagenología postquimiorradiación neoadyuvante y la positividad y recurrencia en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales en histopatología.Se analizaron un total de 64 pacientes. La media del tamaño de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales antes y después de la quimiorradiación neoadyuvante fue de 12.6 ± 9.5 mm y 8.5 ± 5.4 mm, respectivamente. El tamaño mínimo de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales positivos fue de 5 mm en las imágenes postquimiorradiación neoadyuvante. Entre 13 (20.3%) pacientes que tenían5 mm de ganglio linfático lateral pélvico después de la quimiorradiación neoadyuvante; ninguno fue positivo en histopatología. Entre 51 (79.7%) pacientes con ganglio linfático pélvico lateral ≥ 5 mm después de la quimiorradiación neoadyuvante; 33 pacientes (64.7%) fueron positivos en histopatología. La supervivencia general a 5 años y la supervivencia específica de la enfermedad fueron mayores en el grupo histológico de ganglio linfático pélvico lateral negativo que en el grupo de ganglio linfático pélvico lateral positivo (Supervivencia general 79.6% vs 61.8%, p = 0.122; Supervivencia específica de la enfermedad 84.5% vs 66.2%, p = 0.088). Después de una mediana de seguimiento de 39 meses, no hubo pacientes en el grupo de5 mm que hayan fallecido por cáncer. No hubo recurrencias en el compartimento lateral en toda la cohorte.Al ser un estudio retrospectivo en un solo centro puede limitar la generalización.El tamaño de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales postquimiorradiación neoadyuvante ≥ 5 mm se asoció fuertemente con la positividad histopatológica. Ningún paciente con tamaño5 mm tuvo ganglios linfáticos histopatológicamente positivos. Después de la disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales, ningún paciente con ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales positivos desarrolló recurrencia del compartimiento lateral. Por lo tanto, los pacientes con cáncer rectal con evidencia clínica de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales y tamaño de ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales postquimiorradiación neoadyuvante ≥ 5 mm deben considerarse para disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales en el momento de la escisión total de mesorrecto. Vea el Abstract en video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B3.

BACKGROUND: Ileostomies are a routine part of the care of rectal cancer patients, but are associated with significant risk for dehydration, readmission, and acute kidney injury. Telemedicine has proven beneficial in decreasing readmission in chronic medical illnesses, but its utility in ileostomy patients is not well studied. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of televideoconferencing in the assessment of ileostomy output. DESIGN: An institutional review board-approved, prospective clinical trial was conducted at a single institution from November, 2014-December, 2015. SETTINGS: The study was conducted in a single, large academic medical center. PATIENTS: Patients >18 years of age undergoing surgery with plans for ileostomy were eligible. INTERVENTIONS: Televideoconference assessments of ileostomy output and the need for medical intervention were conducted during the postoperative stay and compared to in-person assessment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint of the trial was feasibility of using teleconferencing to assess the need for medical intervention, defined as 90% agreement between telemedicine and in-person assessments. Secondary endpoints included patient/provider satisfaction and correlative studies examined dehydration events and readmission. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients underwent 44 teleconferencing assessments of ileostomy output. Compared to in-person treatment decisions, there was a 95% match (95% CI: 85%, 99%). The readmission rate for the study participants was 31% and 18% experienced dehydration events. Both patients and faculty responded favorably to surveys regarding the use of telemedicine in the perioperative period. LIMITATIONS: The study is limited by its in-hospital use of technology and small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Televideoconference evaluation is a feasible, reliable means of assessing ileostomy output with high patient and physician acceptance. Our pilot study provides rationale for further study in the post-discharge setting for patients with ileostomies. The incorporation of televideoconference assessment within a teledischarge program may enable early intervention to improve patient outcomes.

PURPOSE: The robotic system offers potential technical advantages over laparoscopy for total mesorectal excision with radical lymphadenectomy for rectal cancer. However, the requirement for fixed docking limits its utility when the working volume is large or patient repositioning is required. The purpose of this study was to evaluate short-term outcomes associated with a novel setup to perform total mesorectal excision and radical lymphadenectomy for rectal cancer by the use of a “reverse” hybrid robotic-laparoscopic approach. METHODS: This is a prospective consecutive cohort observational study of patients who underwent robotic rectal cancer resection from January 2009 to March 2011. During the study period, a technique of reverse-hybrid robotic-laparoscopic rectal resection with radical lymphadenectomy was developed. This technique involves reversal of the operative sequence with lymphovascular and rectal dissection to precede proximal colonic mobilization. This technique evolved from a conventional-hybrid resection with laparoscopic vascular control, colonic mobilization, and robotic pelvic dissection. Perioperative and short-term oncologic outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty patients underwent reverse-hybrid resection. Median tumor location was 5 cm (interquartile range 3–9) from the anal verge. Median BMI was 27.6 (interquartile range 25.0–32.1 kg/m2). Twenty (66.7%) received neoadjuvant chemoradiation. There were no conversions. Median blood loss was 100 mL (interquartile range 75–200). Total operation time was a median 369 (interquartile range 306–410) minutes. Median docking time was 6 (interquartile range 5–8) minutes, and console time was 98 (interquartile range 88–140) minutes. Resection was R0 in all patients; no patients had an incomplete mesorectal resection. Six patients (20%) underwent extended lymph node dissection or en bloc resection. CONCLUSIONS: Reverse-hybrid robotic surgery for rectal cancer maximizes the therapeutic applicability of the robotic and conventional laparoscopic techniques for optimized application in minimally invasive rectal surgery.

Desmoid tumors are a clinical problem in 12 to 15 percent of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. There is no predictably effective treatment for intra-abdominal desmoid tumors, which sometimes cause significant complications by their effects on the ureters or bowel. The relative rarity and the clinical heterogeneity of intra-abdominal desmoid tumors make randomized studies difficult to do. In this article a staging system is proposed to make multi-institutional studies easier. Intra-abdominal desmoid tumors can be staged according to their size, clinical presentation and growth pattern. A way of staging intra-abdominal desmoid tumors is proposed to facilitate stratification by disease severity during collaborative studies of various treatments.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of photodynamic therapy in the management of residual neoplasms of the perianal skin. METHODS: This is a retro-spective review. Five patients with pathologic confirmation of residual perianal neoplasms were treated with photodynamic therapy. There were three females. The mean age was 52 (range, 33–79) years. Pathology consisted of Bowen's disease in two patients, squamous-cell carcinoma in two patients, and extramammary Paget's disease in one patient. Four patients received one photodynamic therapy treatment and one patient received two treatments three months apart. RESULTS: Treatment was followed by immediate perianal erythema, subsequent blister formation in 36 to 48 hours, and sloughing of the treated area in 72 hours. With a mean follow-up of 5.2 (range, 1–8) years, there were two recurrences. One recurrence was in a patient four years after treatment for Paget's disease, and the other was in a patient nine months after treatment for Bowen's disease. The latter was managed successfully with wide local excision. Treatment-related toxicities included significant perianal pain in four patients, controlled with analgesia management. CONCLUSIONS: Photodynamic therapy can successfully be used after wide local excision for residual neoplasms of the perianal skin. Treatment can be rendered with acceptable morbidity.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the intraoperative, postoperative, and long-term complications of an absorbable pelvic mesh sling after surgery for rectal carcinoma. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records from April 8, 1991, through April 8, 1996. RESULTS: Twenty patients with a mean age of 57 (range, 37–79) years underwent pelvic mesh sling placement. The tumor stages were as follows: Stage I, 5; Stage II, 2; Stage III, 11; and Stage IV, 1. A recurrent perianal basal cell carcinoma was not included in the staging group. Surgery consisted of 18 abdominoperineal resections, 1 total proctocolectomy, and one Hartmann's procedure. Mean follow-up was 18 (range, 2–49) months. There were no intraoperative complications related to mesh placement. Twenty-nine complications occurred in 14 patients during the immediate postoperative period. Five were possibly mesh-related and included a pelvic abscess, perineal seroma, toxic perineal wound, pulmonary embolus, and lower extremity deep venous thrombosis, respectively. A mild postoperative ileus developed in 17 patients (85 percent), and a diet was initiated at a mean of seven (range, 4–24) days. Fourteen patients received postoperative radiotherapy with a mean dose of 5,339 (range, 2,500–7,020) cGy delivered in 180-cGy fractions. There were 14 immediate complications caused by radiotherapy in 11 patients, but only two patients required delays in treatment. Two patients had diarrhea alone, six developed perineal dermatitis alone, and three patients had both diarrhea and perineal dermatitis. All patients with diarrhea had received chemoradiation. One patient developed a partial small-bowel obstruction following radiation. CONCLUSIONS: Absorbable pelvic mesh sling placement can be performed with minimum morbidity and is recommended following surgery for rectal cancer when radiation is anticipated as part of multimodality therapy.

PURPOSE: Adenosquamous carcinomas of the colon and rectum are rare tumors. These tumors have malignant glandular and squamous components capable of metastasizing. We report seven patients with adenosquamous carcinoma of the colon and rectum and their clinical outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective review was undertaken of seven patients who were identified by the tumor registry at Roswell Park Cancer Institute between 1971 and 1994. RESULTS: These represent a 0.18 percent incidence of adenocarcinomas in our institution. There were five tumors located in the rectum and two in the colon. All patients were Stage III or IV on presentation. Median overall survival was 23 months. In three patients, the tumor was associated with ulcerative colitis; in one of these patients, hypercalcemia was present. All patients died of their disease or with the disease. CONCLUSIONS: Previously reported aggressive behavior of this cancer is confirmed in our series.

INTRODUCTION: Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is an autosomal dominant condition characterized by early age of onset colorectal cancer, right-sided predominance, excess of synchronous and metachronous colonic neoplasms, and extracolonic cancers. The purpose of this study is to report clinical characteristics of HNPCC families in our registry. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of medical records of patients with a significant history of colorectal cancer and interviews with their families. RESULTS: Three hundred one people with cancer in 40 HNPCC families were identified. In 284 of 301 (94 percent) people, 363 cancers were identified. Colorectal cancer only was identified in 182 people (64 percent) and, in conjunction with extracolonic tumors, in another 31 people (11 percent). Extracolonic cancer alone was noted in 71 people (25 percent). Median age at diagnosis of colorectal cancer was 48 (range, 17–92) years. In patients with documented pathology, right-sided tumors predominated (55 percent), synchronous and metachronous tumors were noted in 33 percent, and synchronous or metachronous adenomas were documented in 51 percent of people. Generational anticipation was also noted. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates and confirms characteristics that have been described in HNPCC. Namely, early age of onset of colorectal cancer, right-sided predominance, multiple synchronous and metachronous neoplasms, increased extracolonic cancers, and generational anticipation.

PURPOSE: It is commonly believed that the right lobe of the liver is the most frequent site of colorectal liver metastases. However, direct evidence for this is lacking in the literature. This study was designed to document and evaluate the pattern of liver metastases according to liver segments. METHODS: A retrospective medical records review of 270 patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal adenocarcinoma was performed to determine the pattern of metastases according to Couinaud's segments. There was operative confirmation of liver metastases in 202 patients (75 percent). A total of 1,166 segments were involved with liver metastases and were used in this analysis. Segment I was excluded from calculations because of its dual blood supply. When groups contained different numbers of Couinaud's segments an appropriate correction was made in the statistical comparison. RESULTS: There were 736 (63 percent) right lobe segments (V,VI, VE, VIE) and 430 (37 percent) left lobe segments (II, III, IV) involved with metastases (P

A retrospective analysis of the prognostic significance of anastomotic recurrence in 50 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma was conducted from 1970 to 1987. All primary cancers were located above 10 cm from the anal verge. Forty anastomotic recurrences (80 percent) followed resection of sigmoid or proximal rectal tumors. The overall disease-free interval was 13 months, with 90 percent of recurrences diagnosed within 24 months of the primary resection. Forty-five recurrences (90 percent) were associated with synchronous or metachronous metastases. Overall median survival following the recurrence was 16 months--37 months if the anastomosis was the only recurrence site. Of five patients alive without evidence of disease, all were asymptomatic, and recurrence was confined to the anastomosis. In conclusion, anastomotic recurrence following resection of colorectal adenocarcinoma frequently heralds disseminated disease but can be potentially resected for cure if it is the only site in an otherwise asymptomatic patient.