Search

Background: Abuse of psychostimulants, including methamphetamine (MA), has been linked to heightened impulsivity. While previous research has demonstrated differences in impulsivity between MA users and non-substance users, less is known about variability in impulsivity within MA users and whether the severity of MA use related problems predicts impulsivity within individuals who regularly use MA. This study aims to elucidate the relationship between impulsivity and MA use severity., Method: Non-treatment seeking individuals who reported regular MA use (n = 177) completed an impulsivity battery comprising self-report and behavioral measures. A structural equation modeling (SEM) approach was used to test the relationship between the MA use related problem severity and measures of impulsivity., Results: The final SEM model of impulsivity and MA use related problems (CFI = 0.897, RMSEA = 0.059, S-B scaled χ 2 [260,n = 103] = 406.86) revealed that greater MA use severity was associated with greater self-reported impulsiveness, but no relationship was found between MA use severity and behavioral measures of impulsivity., Conclusions: The current findings extend previous research by providing additional evidence that MA use is associated with increased self-reported impulsivity and highlights the importance of evaluating impulsivity as a multidimensional construct., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

An alcohol use disorder is a major predisposing factor for methamphetamine (MA) abuse. Further, MA-alcohol co-abuse is a risk factor for treatment discontinuation and non-compliance in MA-dependent individuals. No effective treatment exists for MA addiction, let alone treatments directed at those suffering from MA-alcohol addiction co-morbidity. Thus, it is imperative that we develop high-throughput animal models to study the biobehavioral interactions between MA and alcohol of relevance to the etiology and treatment of co-abuse. To this end, we reported that a history of binge alcohol-drinking [5,10, 20 and 40% (v/v); 2 h/day for 10-14 days] reduces MA reinforcement and intake, but it augments MA-preference and intake when drug availability is behaviorally non-contingent. To reconcile this apparent discrepancy in findings, we employed a comparable 2-week binge-drinking paradigm as that employed in our previous studies followed by place-conditioning procedures (4 pairings of 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2 or 4 mg/kg MA, i.p.). This was meant to determine how a prior binge-drinking history impacts the affective valence of MA and sensitivity to MA-induced psychomotor-activation/sensitization. Prior binge-drinking history blunted spontaneous locomotor activity and shifted the MA dose-place-preference function upwards of water drinking controls. The potentiation of MA-conditioned reward by prior binge-drinking history was independent of any alcohol effects upon the locomotor-activating or -sensitizing effects of MA. Based on these results we propose that the reduced MA reinforcement reported previously by our group likely reflects a compensatory response to an increased sensitivity to MA's positive subjective effects rather than increased sensitivity to the drug's psychomotor-activating effects., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)