Search

Unlabelled: Indobufen inhibits platelet aggregation by reversibly inhibiting the platelet cyclooxygenase enzyme thereby suppressing thromboxane synthesis. Clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy of oral indobufen in the secondary prevention of thromboembolic complications in patients with or without atrial fibrillation, in the prevention of graft occlusion after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and in the treatment of intermittent claudication. In the secondary prevention of thromboembolic events indobufen 200 mg once or twice daily was significantly more effective than no treatment although not as effective as ticlopidine 250 mg once or twice daily, during 1-year nonblind clinical trials. Compared with placebo, indobufen 100 mg twice daily significantly reduced the risk of stroke in a small 28-month trial of patients at increased risk of systemic embolism (50% had atrial fibrillation). Furthermore, in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and a recent cerebrovascular event enrolled in the 1-year Studio Italiano Fibrillazione Atriale (SIFA) trial, indobufen 100 or 200 mg twice daily was as effective as warfarin (titrated to produce an international normalised ratio of 2.0 to 3.5) in the secondary prevention of thromboembolic events; the incidences of the composite end-point of major vascular events (10.6 vs 9.0%) and recurrent stroke (5 vs 4%) were similar between treatments. In 2 large 12-month trials, the Studio Indobufene nel Bypass Aortocoronarico (SINBA) and the UK study, indobufen 200 mg twice daily was as effective as aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) 300 or 325 mg plus dipyridamole 75 mg 3 times daily in the prevention of early and late occlusion of saphenous grafts in patients after CABG surgery. Indobufen 200 mg twice daily for 6 months significantly improved walking capacity compared with placebo, and caused a more pronounced improvement in both pain-free and total walking distance than either pentoxifylline 300 mg or aspirin 500 mg twice daily in separate 6- and 12-month studies of patients with intermittent claudication. Oral indobufen up to 200 mg twice daily was generally well tolerated in >5000 patients with atherosclerotic disease. Adverse events (predominantly gastrointestinal), reported by 3.9% of patients, rarely required withdrawal from treatment. In the SINBA and UK studies, fewer adverse events and less gastrointestinal bleeding were seen with indobufen than with aspirin plus dipyridamole treatment, while in the SIFA trial, noncerebral bleeding events occurred significantly less frequently in indobufen than warfarin recipients (0.6 vs 5.1%) and major bleeding events occurred only in the warfarin group., Conclusion: Indobufen is as effective as warfarin in the prophylaxis of thromboembolic events in at risk patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation, as aspirin plus dipyridamole in the prevention of CABG occlusion and may be more effective than aspirin or pentoxifylline in improving walking capacity in patients with intermittent claudication. The improved tolerability profile of indobufen (favourable gastric tolerance and reduced haemorrhagic complications) compared with aspirin 300 to 325 mg 3 times daily or warfarin, in addition to a similar antiplatelet effect, suggests indobufen can be considered a drug with a definite role in the management of atherothrombotic events. In particular, indobufen may be an effective alternative for at risk patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation in whom anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated or who are at higher risk of bleeding.

Unlabelled: Losartan is an orally active, nonpeptide, selective angiotensin subtype 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist. It provides a more specific and complete blockade of the actions of angiotensin II than renin or ACE inhibitors. Short term (up to 12 weeks' duration) clinical trials have shown losartan to be as effective at lowering blood pressure (BP) [causes a decrease in BP < or = 26/20 mm Hg] in elderly patients with hypertension as recommended dosages of captopril, atenolol, enalapril, felodipine and nifedipine. In patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) the efficacy of losartan was similar to that of atenolol. The addition of hydrochlorothiazide to losartan therapy provides greater antihypertensive efficacy, equivalent to that seen with captopril plus hydrochlorothiazide. Preliminary evidence also indicates that losartan therapy contributes to the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy associated with chronic hypertension. Exercise capacity is increased by losartan in patients with either asymptomatic or symptomatic heart failure. Results from the Losartan Heart Failure Survival or ELITE II (Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly II) study indicate that there was no statistically significant difference between losartan and captopril in reducing overall deaths or in reducing sudden cardiac death and/or resuscitated cardiac arrest in patients with heart failure. Other than ELITE II, little conclusive long term mortality and morbidity data exist for losartan. Additional long term trials to evaluate the survival benefits of losartan in elderly patients with hypertension, renal disease or after an acute myocardial infarction are currently in progress. In elderly patients with hypertension, the incidence of treatment-related adverse events associated with once daily losartan (alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide) [19 to 27%] was similar to felodipine (23%) and nifedipine (21%), however, losartan tended to be better tolerated than captopril (11 vs 16%). Losartan was also better tolerated than atenolol in patients with ISH (10.4 vs 23%). In patients with heart failure the renal tolerability of losartan was similar to that of captopril, but losartan was associated with a lower withdrawal rate because of adverse events. No dosage adjustment is required in elderly or in patients with mild to moderate renal dysfunction, and the risk of first-dose hypotension is low., Conclusions: comparative data have shown losartan to be as effective as other antihypertensive agents in the treatment of elderly patients with hypertension. Treatment with losartan is therefore an option for first-line therapy in all patients with hypertension, particularly those who are not well managed with or who are intolerant of their current therapy. Morbidity and mortality data from the Losartan Heart Failure Survival (ELITE II) study show that losartan has potential in the treatment of heart failure.

Midodrine is a prodrug which undergoes enzymatic hydrolysis to the selective alpha 1-adrenoceptor agonist desglymidodrine after oral administration. Oral midodrine significantly increases 1-minute standing systolic blood pressure compared with placebo. The drug also improves standing time and energy level and clinical symptoms of orthostatic hypotension including dizziness, light-headedness and syncope. Comparative studies have shown midodrine to have similar efficacy to dihydroergotamine mesylate, norfenefrine, fludrocortisone and etilefrine, and to be more effective than dimetofrine and ephedrine in patients with orthostatic hypotension. Midodrine is well tolerated, with the most commonly reported adverse events being piloerection, pruritus, paraesthesias, urinary retention and chills. The risk of supine hypertension, which is associated with midodrine therapy in up to 25% of patients, can be reduced by taking the final daily dose at least 4 hours before bedtime. Thus, oral midodrine is an effective therapeutic option for the management of various forms of orthostatic hypotension. This well-tolerated agent is likely to be useful in conjunction with standard nonpharmacological care.