Search

Abstract The stochastic EXtended finite‐fault ground‐motion SIMulation algorithm (EXSIM) has been widely applied in simulating and predicting broadband strong ground‐motion. However, an increasingly number of researchers have found that EXSIM may overestimate ground‐motions at low frequencies for some large‐magnitude earthquakes and/or thrust earthquakes, for which the far‐field source model has been explained by a double‐corner‐frequency model. Despite controversy, the double‐corner‐frequency model is now being accepted as one of the main categories of the far‐field source model. This study demonstrated the limited applicability of EXSIM to earthquakes explained by the double‐corner‐frequency source model, by presenting the equivalence between motions generated by EXSIM and those generated by EXSIM's point‐source version, SMSIM, which adopts the ω‐square single‐corner‐frequency model. Furthermore, two improvements to EXSIM have been proposed: (a) the incorporation of the asperity‐distributed stress‐drop compound faults model and (b) the hybrid application of EXSIM with the proposed model. The effects of the two improvements have been verified by comparing EXSIM‐generating motions with recorded ground‐motions for the 2013 Mw 6.7 Lushan thrust earthquake. Significantly, consistent simulation accuracy has been achieved across high‐ and low‐frequency bands as well as in far‐ and near‐fields. The consistent accuracy of the improved EXSIM in simulating high‐ and low‐frequency ground motions enables its direct and independent application to broadband ground motion simulations. Moreover, the first validation of this consistent accuracy in both near‐ and far‐field scenarios further enhances its application in earthquake engineering practices.