Search

Lowland coastal plain rivers are important for navigation and ecosystems, having unique concerns regarding water and sediment management. The Apalachicola River in Florida, the lower end of the ACF (Apalachicola–Chattahoochee–Flint) system, had historical modifications beginning in the 1800s. Most impacts are attributable to the Apalachicola Navigation Project in the latter half of the 20th century, which included dredging, disposal, rock and snag removal, artificial cutoffs, and wing‐dike building. As one of few studies using paired hydrographic surveys over a long reach and time (170 km, 50 years), we defined four zones of bed elevation change between 1960 and 2010 based on the cumulative thalweg elevation plots. The river has four bed change zones: (1) uppermost, marked degradation from river mile (RM) 106 to 85 because of dam construction; (2) middle, minimal degradation from RM 85 to 34; (3) artificial cutoff zone, highest degradation, from RM 34 to 27; and (4) lowermost zone, aggradation from RM 27 to Apalachicola Bay because of upstream bed and bank sediment disturbances. Artificial cutoffs and lithology influence lateral migration, with rates being highest in cutoff zones and least in areas with some bedrock upstream and finer sediments downstream. Length changes from 1941 to 2019 are stable, except for the middle reach, which lengthened nearly 10%, and the lower non‐tidal reach, where length shortened with cutoffs then regained in subsequent decades. Minimizing disturbance has led to 18% of the sand bar area revegetating since a decade of dredging ended. This framework helps in understanding historic and ongoing human activities, notably upstream water consumption, connectivity changes, sediment inputs, and climate change, that will affect the water and sediment management of the river, its floodplain, and bay, thus varying approaches for restoration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Riverbed changes are important to applications in engineering in the environment, such as navigation, salt‐water intrusion and habitat quality. This study employed decadal hydrographic data over the past 50 years (1963–2013), as well as daily water stages and discharges to outline the long‐term channel morphological changes and bed‐load sediments deposited by floods in the lowermost Mississippi River (LMR). To generate accurate bathymetric digital elevation models (DEMs), we interpolated the hydrographic survey in a channel‐centred coordinate system by employing ordinary kriging with anisotropy. Riverbed deformations were estimated by subtracting the elevations between DEMs at two different times to generate a series of DoDs (DEM of difference). The results from DoDs exhibit temporal riverbed change patterns and also reveal net degradation after the completion of the Old River Control Structure in 1963, except for the period 1992–2004. Spatially, over 32% of the total area experienced continuous erosion, with only 0.4% having continuous aggradation. Historical erosion over the past 50 years could be removing the alluvial veneer in sections of the river, and exposing more non‐alluvial sediments, particularly between river kilometre RK 230 and RK 40. Our analysis also shows that riverbed deformation patterns are mainly controlled by flood events, backwater effects, as well as the drawdown effect near the Bonnet Carré spillway. In this study, we also examine whether the LMR traps bed‐load sediment under flood conditions. The probability distribution estimated by Monte Carlo simulation suggests only low amounts of bed‐load sediments are deposited on the channel bed during floods. Spatially, the short‐term bed‐load erosion/deposition pattern roughly matches the decadal‐scale riverbed deformation estimated from DoDs. Moreover, this study finds that the trends between the thalweg changes and riverbed deformation are similar, suggesting that both of these patterns are controlled by the same factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anthropogenic impacts in large rivers are widely studied, but studies of recovery once a disturbance has stopped are uncommon. This study examines the biogeomorphic recovery of a 40‐km river corridor on the mid‐Apalachicola River, Florida following the cessation of dredging, disposal, and snag removal in 2002. This failed navigation project resulted in vegetation losses (~166 ha between 1941 and 2004), river widening, and increased point bar areas. We used paired sets of imagery for a 10‐year period during the recovery process at two different flow levels to assess sand bar change, land cover change, and their spatial variations. Most large sand bars decreased significantly in area due to growth of pioneer species, typically from the bankside of the bar. Mean bar area shrank 0.17 and 0.20 ha for the 30th and 1st percentile flows, respectively. For the entire study area, both water‐level comparisons showed gains in vegetation (23.36 and 15.83 ha), compensated by losses in the extent of water (16.83 and 8.55 ha) and sand bar losses (6.53 and 7.28 ha). Overall, these gains during the 10‐year passive recovery period are equivalent to ~15% of the vegetation losses that resulted from the navigational dredging. As found in other studies, most of the pioneer vegetation grew approximately 2 m relative elevation above the low‐water surface. The initial length of the tree line and the area of herbaceous growth both had a significant and positive relationship with the area of new vegetation growth over the study interval. As parts of the river are healing, reduced channel capacity from narrowing and tree growth will benefit the floodplain. As elsewhere, understanding of a river's biogeomorphology, hydrology, and disturbance history can help in selecting appropriate recovery metrics to further advance the understanding and management of disturbed floodplains. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]