Search

Abstract: A significant body of new information about the development of coral reefs during the last 23 ka has been generated in the last three decades. In the Indo-Pacific province, structures from a variety of geodynamic settings have been investigated using subsurface drilling and submersible diving. This paper is based principally on the re-examination of the core dataset from the literature, with reconversion of many previously published radiocarbon ages into calendar dates. Seven framework and three detrital facies were identified on the basis of the nature and growth shapes of dominant framework builders, and on that of the texture of sediments, respectively. Framework facies in high-hydrodynamic energy settings were dominated by an association of coralline algae and robust-branching corals (Acropora robusta group, A. gr. humilis, A. palifera, Pocillopora damicornis) with locally encrusting coral forms (faviids). In moderate energy environments, these were replaced by domal (Porites), tabular-branching (Acropora gr. hyacinthus) and arborescent (Acropora gr. muricata), whereas sheltered areas included an association of arborescent, foliaceous (Montipora, Pavona) and encrusting coral species. Detrital facies comprise coral rubble, carbonate sand and mud. On compositional and textural bases, four main sand subfacies were recognized: coralgal rudstone to packstone; coral–molluscan grainstone/packstone; molluscan–foraminiferal grainstone/packstone; and green algal (Halimeda) grainstone/packstone. Despite some overlaps in the sand facies association, each subfacies can provide additional support to reconstruction of paleoreef environments. Three types of framework facies association were identified within entire reef-margin sequences: framework of homogeneous composition reflecting stability of environmental conditions through time; superimposition of two distinct frameworks, usually as deeper water corals overlain by shallower, higher energy ones, and recurrent alternations of shallower and deeper coral assemblages. The two last associations resulted probably from lateral displacements of coral communities in response to rapid changes in accommodation space. Such facies transitions also are described from backreef sediment piles: gravel graded into sand and mud successively as a result of upward shallowing. The degree of reef development seems to be linked to coral community structure. Communities consisting principally of branching and domal coral forms favoured substantial accretion and the formation of well-developed reefs, whereas assemblages comprising foliaceous and encrusting colonies produced only incipient reefs. Within reef systems, the proportions of detritus over framework tend to increase as hydrodynamic energy declines. The Indo-Pacific reef systems are classified into four anatomy types on the basis of dominant depositional patterns: balanced aggrading/onlapping, unbalanced aggrading/downlapping, prograding and backstepping types. Vertical accretion rates of frameworks are highly variable and are not directly dictated by coral growth habits. However, the highest rates recorded (up to 20 mm year−1) relate to tabular- and arborescent-acroporid rich sections. Abrupt variations in the aggradation rates of framework are recorded in sequences at the transitional zone between two distinct coral assemblages. In detritus-dominated sequences, accumulation rates range from 0.2 to about 40 mm year−1, with higher values suggesting intense hurricane-controlled deposition. In addition, accretion rates also seem to depend on water-energy conditions. In high-energy environments, aggradation rates did not exceed 12 mm year−1, but reached 25 mm year−1 in more protected areas. By contrast, lateral accretion operated at an average rate of 90 mm year−1 in agitated waters, while it did not exceed the mean rate of 55 mm year−1 in calm waters. Changes in accretion rates appear to be linked to reef growth modes. In the reef zones driven by a “keep-up” mode, mean vertical accretion rates range at around 6 mm year−1. The reef zones developed through a “catch-up” mode at rates of 3–4 mm year−1. There was little variation in accretion rates according to latitude. At the Last Glacial Maximum, from 23 to about 19 ka BP, reefs (Reef Generation RGO) only developed along what were to become the foreslopes of present reefs, forming accumulations a few metres thick at vertical rates of up to 1 mm year−1. The rapid postglacial rise in sea level, from about 19 to 6.5 ka BP, was accompanied by the settlement of three successive reef generations (the so called RGI, RGII and RGIII), within the periods 17.5–14.7, 13.8–11.5 and 10 ka BP to the Present. During the Postglacial transgression, regional to local differences in gross morphology and internal architecture of the reefs have been determined by differing sea-level histories in combination with neotectonics and typographic factors. Locally, reef colonization seems to have been facilitated or prevented chiefly by small-scale topographic features. Development during subsequent deglaciation was probably largely independent of variations in sea surface temperatures. Water turbidity also seems to have been only a minor determinant of reef settlement and growth, but may locally have controlled the composition of coral communities, resulting in the growth of turbidity-tolerant domal and foliaceous forms. Changes in atmospheric CO2 levels remained within the tolerance thresholds for reef calcification. The three main reef growth episodes coincide roughly with rapid increases in atmospheric pCO2. Dust input and variations in sea surface salinities seem to have had a very limited control on reef growth. The LGM was characterized by salinities comparable with those of the present, but by higher dust fluxes. By contrast, nutrient levels, hydrodynamic energy, and to a lesser, extent coral recruitment in relation to substrate availability and ocean circulation, have played major roles in determining reef accretion patterns at both local and regional scales. Two periods of increased upwelling in the western Indian Ocean, at 15.3 and 11.5–10.8 ka BP, coincided with the demise of RGI and RGII. During deglaciation, high-frequency storm events probably led to a scarcity of typical growth framework reefs and favoured the formation of structures composed of reworked and recemented coral framework. Storm control may have been particularly important in the mid-Holocene when water depths over incipient reefs were greater than 5 m. From the LGM to the early Holocene, coral settlement has probably declined due to a lack of suitable nurseries, until the modern patterns of ocean circulation were established and thus favoured larval dispersal from refuges. It is highly desirable to improve analysis of the core database and to increase the number of core-transects, including forereef sites, to enhance our knowledge of Recent reef development. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

This paper reviews current understanding of deglaciation in North, Central and South America from the Last Glacial Maximum to the beginning of the Holocene. Together with paleoclimatic and paleoceanographic data, we compare and contrast the pace of deglaciation and the response of glaciers to major climate events. During the Global Last Glacial Maximum (GLGM, 26.5-19 ka), average temperatures decreased 4° to 8°C in the Americas, but precipitation varied strongly throughout this large region. Many glaciers in North and Central America achieved their maximum extent during the GLGM, whereas others advanced even farther during the subsequent Heinrich Stadial 1 (HS-1). Glaciers in the Andes also expanded during the GLGM, but that advance was not the largest, except on Tierra del Fuego. HS-1 (17.5-14.6 ka) was a time of general glacier thickening and advance throughout most of North and Central America, and in the tropical Andes; however, glaciers in the temperate and subpolar Andes thinned and retreated during this period. During the Bølling-Allerød interstadial (B-A, 14.6-12.9 ka), glaciers retreated throughout North and Central America and, in some cases, completely disappeared. Many glaciers advanced during the Antarctic Cold Reversal (ACR, 14.6-12.9 ka) in the tropical Andes and Patagonia. There were small advances of glaciers in North America, Central America and in northern South America (Venezuela) during the Younger Dryas (12.9-11.7 ka), but glaciers in central and southern South America retreated during this period, except on the Altiplano where advances were driven by an increase in precipitation. Taken together, we suggest that there was a climate compensation effect, or 'seesaw', between the hemispheres, which affected not only marine currents and atmospheric circulation, but also the behavior of glaciers. This seesaw is consistent with the opposing behavior of many glaciers in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]