Search

The Proterozoic geological records in eastern South China preserve a history linked to the Columbia and Rodinia supercontinent cycles and provide key constraints in understanding the geodynamic evolution of East Asia. However, it is uncertain if SW Hainan, Yangtze and Cathaysia were located in the interior or periphery of the Precambrian supercontinents, how they were connected prior to the formation of a united South China, whether the early Neoproterozoic Proto-Huanan subduction was long- or short-lived, and how and when Yangtze and Cathaysia were assembled along the Jiangnan Orogen. This paper provides an overview of key geological observations for the eastern Yangtze and Cathaysia with respect to Proterozoic tectonics. Our synthesis shows that the SW Hainan in the Mesoproterozoic (ca. 1.45 Ga) developed in a non-orogenic rift setting in the interior of Columbia. SW Hainan, together with SW Yangtze, drifted to the margin of Rodinia by ∼1.05 Ga. Furthermore, SW Hainan might have been part of the Mesoproterozoic Albany Fraser Orogen at ca. 1.30–1.05 Ga. Cathaysia and eastern Yangtze display distinct geological signatures in the early Neoproterozoic and Cathaysia remain separated from Yangtze until at least ca. 1.0 Ga. The ca. 1.0–0.9 Ga felsic igneous rocks in Cathaysia to the east of the Jiangshan-Shaoxing suture zone are mostly characterized by negative ε Hf (t) values, and distinct from those in the coeval Shuangxiwu arc to the west of the Jiangshan-Shaoxing suture zone, which have positive ε Hf (t) values. Igneous rocks dated at ca. 870–830 Ma (mainly ca. 850–830 Ma) are extensive in the Huaiyu and Jiangnan Orogen but poorly developed in Cathaysia. Neoproterozoic sedimentary rocks of Cathaysia contain abundant ca. 980 Ma detrital grains but only minor ca. 860–830 Ma grains. In contrast, in the Jiangnan and Huaiyu, the sedimentary rocks contain a dominant ca. 860–830 Ma detrital zircon age-peak but ca. 980 Ma grains are scare. Rift-related bi-model igneous rocks, ranging in age from ca. 810 Ma to ca. 750 Ma, represented by the Banxi, Likou and Mamianshan groups and their equivalents, are extensively developed in Cathaysia and Huaiyu, and the Jiangnan Orogen. These rift-related successions are separated from the Cangshuipu and Luojiamen conglomerates across an angular unconformity, which are in turn unconformable on the Lengjiaxi and Xikou groups. It is herein proposed that an early Neoproterozoic (ca. 1.0–0.9 Ga) accretionary orogen developed within the Cathaysia and lay along strike from the synchronous Eastern Ghats Orogen of India. A long-lived Neoproterozoic (ca. 0.97–0.83 Ga) Proto-Huanan arc-trench system resulted in the development of the ca. 0.98–0.88 Ga Shuangxiwu intra-oceanic arc, ca. 0.87–0.83 Huaiyu continental arc and ca. 0.87–0.83 Jiangnan intra-continental back- arc basin in response to the ongoing westward-subduction beneath the eastern Yangtze. At ca. 0.87 Ga, the arc-trench system switched from an intra-oceanic to a continental Andean margin setting. Such a system might be compatible to the NW India South Delhi Orogen at the periphery of Rodinia. Our synthesis shows that the united proto-South China was finally created by the ca. 830–810 Ma assemblage of the Yangtze with Cathaysia along the Jiangnan Orogen and was followed by the post-orogenic rifting due to the breakup of Rodinia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB) was generated through multiple collisional and accretionary events in the Paleo-Asian Ocean, a major global ocean that existed from the late Neoproterozoic into the late Paleozoic. Nevertheless, the question of when the Paleo-Asian Ocean finally closed has notoriously been enigmatic, especially due to the absence of large-scale investigations. The South Tianshan-Solonker Suture, is the largest and southernmost suture within the CAOB, and records the ultimate collision between the Tarim-North China cratons with the Siberia craton, and is commonly interpreted as marking the eventual closure of the Paleo-Asian Ocean. In this paper, we synthesize and evaluate relevant Chinese papers on the area, which are not readily available to an international audience, and extend this across the full length of the suture zone. Based on this review, we can divide the suture zone into four distinct segments, which are, from west to east: the South Tianshan Belt, the Beishan Belt, the Solonker Belt and the Yanji Belt. This enables us to provide a more systematic understanding of the nature and development of the South Tianshan-Solonker suture. Geochronological data from Paleozoic cover rocks and high-pressure metamorphic rocks show that during the late Carboniferous, the western section of the Paleo-Asian Ocean closed when the Tarim Craton moved northward to collide with the Kazakhstan-Yili Block, thus marking the initial development of the South Tianshan Belt. The Beishan Belt to the east formed when the Dunhuang-Alxa blocks were transported northward to collide with the Tuva-Mongolia Block, with the youngest zircon U Pb data from ophiolites indicating that closure of the local Beishan Ocean was in the early-middle Permian, although its final closure may not have been until the early late Permian along the northern margin of the Alxa Block, thus making it slightly younger than the South Tianshan Belt. Further to the east, the available petrographic, geochronological and paleontological data from the Solonker Belt indicate that this belt was formed in the middle-late Permian, during which time bi-directional subduction occurred and the North China and Siberia cratons were amalgamated during an 'Appalachian-type' orogeny. Furthermore, we observe that a transition in polarity from northward to bi-directional subduction occurred along the boundary between the Beishan and Solonker belts, which may be related to the East Gobi Transform Fault. In contrast, under the influence of the westward subduction of the Paleo-Pacific Ocean, the Jiamusi-Khanka Block moved southwestward along the Yilan-Yitong Fault in the middle-late Triassic (230–220 Ma) to amalgamate with the North China Craton. The formation of the South Tianshan-Solonker Suture can be characterized by four distinct west-to-east accretion/collision events that lasted from the late Carboniferous to the late Permian. The South Tianshan Belt, the Beishan Belt and the Solonker Belt therefore demarcate, respectively, the amalgamation between the Tarim Craton and the Kazakhstan-Yili Block, the Dunhuang-Alxa Block and the Tuva-Mongolia Block, and the North China Craton with the Siberia Craton, representing the final closure of the Paleo-Asian Ocean. During the middle-late Triassic, the Yanji Belt in the far east was influenced by the Paleo-Pacific tectonic domain as a result of amalgamation between the Jiamusi-Khanka Block and the North China Craton. • South Tianshan-Solonker Suture marks the final collision between Tarim-North China and Siberian cratons. • The Suture includes four segments, and closed form Late Carboniferous to Middle Triassic from west to east, respectively. • The Yanji belt was influenced by the Paleo-Pacific tectonic domain during the Middle Triassic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Northeast (NE) China is located in the eastern Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB) and evolved from the amalgamation of several microcontinental blocks, which, from west to east, include the Erguna, Xing'an, Songliao, and Jiamusi-Khanka blocks. Since the Paleozoic, NE China has undergone multiple stages of subduction–accretion and tectonic destruction under the tectonic domains of the Paleo-Asian Ocean, Panthalassa, and the Paleo-Pacific Ocean. This complexity has resulted in uncertainty surrounding the amalgamation processes of the various microcontinents. Fortunately, several suture zones in NE China, including the Toudaoqiao–Xinlin Suture, the Hegenshan–Heihe Suture, the Solonker–Xar Moron–Changchun Suture, and the Jilin–Heilongjiang High-pressure Belt contain information that provides key constraints on the tectonic evolution of NE China. This paper reviews the spatial distribution, composition, and formation ages of these suture zones based on published geological records. Our temporal and spatial analyses of these suture zones enable the evolution of NE China to be assigned to those three tectonic domains: (1) In the earliest of these, the Paleo-Asian Ocean tectonic domain (650–250 Ma), the Erguna Block amalgamated with the Xing'an Block along the Toudaoqiao–Xinlin Suture during the Late Cambrian (ca. 500 Ma); the Erguna–Xing'an Block then collided with the Songliao Block along the Hegenshan–Heihe Suture during the Late Carboniferous (ca. 300 Ma), whilst the combined Erguna–Xing'an–Songliao Block amalgamated with the North China Craton along the Solonker–Xar Moron–Changchun Suture at the End-Permian (ca. 250 Ma). (2) in the Panthalassa tectonic domain (315–230 Ma), the subduction of Panthalassa (or locally, the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean) was initiated in the eastern Jiamusi-Khanka Block during the Late Carboniferous (ca. 315 Ma), resulting in back-arc extension in the western Jiamusi-Khanka Block, which evolved into the Heilongjiang Ocean separating the Jiamusi-Khanka and Songliao blocks during the Late Permian to Late Triassic (260–230 Ma). (3) in the Paleo-Pacific Ocean tectonic domain (230–130 Ma), the first stage of westward subduction of the Paleo-Pacific oceanic plate occurred during the Late Triassic (ca. 230 Ma), causing the Jiamusi-Khanka Block to amalgamate with the North China Craton during the Late Triassic (ca. 230 Ma) and subsequently with the Songliao Block during the Late Triassic to Early Jurassic (210–180 Ma), forming the Jilin–Heilongjiang High-pressure Belt, whereas the second stage of subduction induced the emplacement of the Nadanhada Terrane during the Early Cretaceous (ca. 130 Ma). This represented the final assembly of NE China in the eastern CAOB. • NE China can be divided into three tectonic domains of the Paleo-Asian Ocean, the Panthalassa, and the Paleo-Pacific Ocean. • The assembly of NE China was accomplished through the generation of five suture zones, which formed from ∼500 Ma to ∼130 Ma. • NE China recorded multiple stages of activity of the Paleo-Asian, Panthalassa (Mongol-Okhotsk), and the Paleo-Pacific oceans. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Subduction and closure of the Proto-Tethys and Palaeo-Tethys oceans were important events in the assembly of Eurasia, and created the Central China Orogenic Belt (CCOB). This paper presents a new tectonic model for the CCOB in which we propose that elongate Precambrian basement blocks within the CCOB were originally part of a single ribbon continent, here named K-Qubed after the K unlun- Q aidam- Q ilian- Q inling regions. K-Qubed separated from the South China Block in the Neoproterozoic. Dextral-oblique subduction of the Proto-Tethys Ocean took place southwards (present co-ordinates) under K-Qubed in latest Precambrian - Cambrian times (ca. 550–500 Ma). Subduction-accretion complexes were generated alongside the basement, while arc magmatism overprinted both basement and accretionary crust. Initial collision of the northern side of the ribbon continent and the North China and Tarim blocks occurred at ca. 500 Ma. High-pressure and ultrahigh-pressure metamorphism resulted by ca. 490 Ma, in the North Qilian, South Altun/North Qaidam and North Qinling regions. Collision triggered a flip in subduction polarity, and caused a subduction-accretion complex and magmatic arc to build out southwards from K-Qubed, as Palaeo-Tethys was consumed northwards in the Ordovician. Magmatic timings were similar between different tectonic units; twin peaks in magmatism at ca. 500–490 Ma and ca. 440–430 Ma occurred in several terranes. Oblique subduction caused strain partitioning, in turn causing slivering and across-strike repetition of basement and accretionary crust. Tectonic units in the Qilian Shan and Kunlun can be partly correlated with equivalents in the Qinling Orogen. We suggest a match between the North Qilian Orogenic Belt and the Erlangping Unit, between the Central Qilian Block and the North Qinling Belt, between the South Qilian Accretionary Belt and the Shangdan Suture Zone. Basement terranes of the Qaidam region and the East Kunlun Orogen have no obvious lateral equivalents in the Qinling, and are truncated at the eastern margins by the West Qinling Belt. There are similar ages for peak metamorphism at ca. 440–420 Ma in an eclogite belt in the North Qaidam Ultra High-pressure Metamorphic Belt (NQUB) and eclogite localities in the East Kunlun Orogen. We interpret this metamorphism to be result of slab break-off beneath the K-Qubed continent, with metamorphic rocks repeated across-strike by dextral shear. The component of Precambrian crust in the Kunlun diminishes westwards into the West Kunlun, where Early Palaeozoic accretion of crust was more continuous. A magmatic gap throughout the CCOB between ca. 370 and ca. 290 Ma was possibly related to extremely oblique and/or slow plate convergence, or represents a time through which subduction stopped. Renewed northwards subduction of the Palaeo-Tethyan Ocean took place under the south side of the Kunlun and Qinling in the Permian, completed by Triassic collisions of the Qiangtang and South China blocks with the southern side of the CCOB. This model for the CCOB is an alternative to collisional and accretionary end members for orogeny, whereby oblique subduction and collision of a ribbon continent produces interleaving of basement and more juvenile terranes. Closure of Proto-Tethys did not involve multiple, separate and synchronous subduction zones, or repetition of a subduction zone by oroclinal bending, as previously proposed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]