1. Radiation exposure of cardiac sonographers working in an academic noninvasive cardiovascular imaging laboratory
- Author
-
David A. Orsinelli, Maryellen H. Orsinelli, and Michael R. Velez
- Subjects
Nursing staff ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Radiation Dosage ,Risk Assessment ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Occupational Exposure ,Medical Laboratory Personnel ,Humans ,Medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Prospective Studies ,Ohio ,Retrospective Studies ,Academic Medical Centers ,Vascular imaging ,Dosimeter ,Radiation Dosimeters ,business.industry ,Significant difference ,Heart ,Retrospective cohort study ,Radiation Exposure ,Radiation exposure ,Echocardiography ,Work flow ,Laboratories ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Nuclear medicine ,business ,Exposure data - Abstract
Background and aim Exposure to workplace radiation among cardiac sonographers has been felt to be low, and patient-related sources have been considered negligible. Sonographers may be exposed to radiation from patient emitted sources as well as external sources in interventional laboratories. This study quantified radiation exposure to cardiac sonographers. Methods Cardiac sonographers, vascular imaging technologists, exercise physiologists, noninvasive nursing staff, and CT/MRI technologists were provided body dosimeter badges. Sonographers were provided dosimeter rings for their scanning hands. Radiation exposure was quantified from the dosimeter data, reported in millirems (mrem) for deep, eye, and shallow exposure, as well as shallow exposure data from the rings. Data were prospectively collected for 63 employees over a 12-month period and retrospectively analyzed. Results The mean annual deep body exposure in sonographers was 8.2 mrem/year, shallow exposure 9.8 mrem/year, eye exposure 8.5 mrem/year, and ring exposure 207 mrem/year. There was a significant difference between body and ring exposure (P = .0002). When comparing exposure data between the vascular imaging technologists, CT/MRI technologists, noninvasive nursing staff, and the cardiac sonographers, there were no statistical differences (P > .23). Exercise physiologists had significantly higher exposure compared to sonographers (P Conclusion This single-center experience demonstrates that, while exposure is low, cardiac sonographers are exposed to workplace radiation, most likely from patient emitted radiation. The finding that radiation exposure from rings exceeded body exposure supports this conclusion. Continued education and assessment of work flow practices should be employed to minimize staff radiation exposure.
- Published
- 2017