Search

In the context of the requirements of the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) numerous benthic indices have been proposed recently to assess the ecological quality of marine and transitional waters. In several studies these metrics were applied to coastal and estuarine environments under diverse anthropogenic pressures. Although currently the dumping of dredged material is one of the most prominent human impacts that modify estuaries, the performance of benthic indices to detect effects of dredged sediment relocation has not yet been tested explicitly. Hence we examined a selection of common metrics (species richness, Shannon diversity, AMBI, M-AMBI, W-value, BO2A) at 11 dumping and 11 nearby reference areas in the highly modified Elbe estuary (Germany), where permanent dredging is necessary to maintain the depth of the navigation channel. In order to cover the entire estuary, the study area spanned over the whole salinity gradient from limnic to euhaline. Additionally, we investigated changes in benthic communities due to dredged material placement. All indices, except the W-value, were suitable to differentiate between dumping and reference areas and showed significantly better index values exclusively at reference areas. The applicability of AMBI and M-AMBI was restricted in the limnic stretch due to the more frequent occurrence of freshwater species there. The W-value and BO2A were non-satisfactory in the case of azoic sediment, and in most cases these two indices indicated much better ecological status classifications than the other indices tested. Furthermore, the BO2A had restricted applicability with increasing salinity. At eight of eleven sites the benthic communities differed significantly between dumping and reference areas. Our findings show that the power of conventional benthic indices to detect physical disturbances like the dumping of dredged sediment varies greatly. Having this in mind, we suggest to choose carefully the benthic indices for ecological quality assessments according to the WFD in estuaries in order to avoid misclassifications. Such errors may lead to unnecessarily expensive remediation activities or, in the opposite case, to inactivity although actions were necessary. Furthermore, in order to better meet the WFD requirements we suggest that, regarding frequency and volume, dumping should be adapted as far as possible to the natural processes of sediment movement.

Indices to assess the ecological status of water bodies according to the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) frequently produce widely differing results when applied to estuarine systems. Although several ecological indices have been employed to coastal environments and in estuaries in particular, there is still a lack of knowledge about their suitability for assessing the ecological status of heavily modified water bodies. Thus, we evaluated the performances of indices and fauna parameters (AMBI, M-AMBI, BOPA, BO2A, W-value, Shannon diversity, species richness, abundance) that have been discussed in the WFD context using data on invertebrates dwelling in two typical morphological units: the navigation channel and the river bank habitats of Elbe estuary (Germany). In addition, we tested their ability to identify several environmental factors (grain size distribution and chemical sediment contamination). All indices were able to detect major changes in macrofauna composition along the estuarine salinity gradient and were able to differentiate between navigation channel and shallow bank habitats. A strong significant correlation was found with most indices with the exceptions of the W-value and the BOPA with mean grain size. Almost all indices signaled poor ecological quality in the coarser fairway sediments against the finer sublitoral bank sediments. However, AMBI and BOPA showed the opposite: both indicators classified the invertebrate assemblages from the navigation channel better compare than the shallower habitats. The correlation of ecological indices and parameters with sediment contaminants and the toxicity of the sediment calculated as toxic units showed a diverse picture: all indices, except species richness and the BOPA, had a certain significant correlation with several individual sediment pollutants, however, only one index, the W-value, was correlated significant with the majority of chemical pollutants (Pb, Cd, Cu, Ni, Hg, Zn, β-HCH, pp′-DDD, and TBT) and the toxic units. Our results show clearly that ecological quality classification of heavily modified estuaries depends strongly on both the index and the habitat. Thus, we conclude that no index should be used on its own to estimate the ecological quality of estuaries. Further investigations and the improvement or development of such indices should place emphasis on their independence from the grain size spectrum of the sediments and on their good correlation with its pollution status.